Environmental disasters: Preparing for impact assessments and operational feedback


  • Pierre Verger, MD
  • Denis Bard, MD, PhD
  • Christine Noiville, PhD
  • Reza Lahidji




disasters, emergency preparedness, expert opinion, risk assessment, prevention and control


On March 24, 2006, the French Minister of Environment asked the Committee for Prevention and Precaution (CPP), an independent multidisciplinary committee created in 1996, to conduct a methodological analysis of operational feedback of natural and technological disasters to determine if France is equipped to collect the information and data necessary for the assessment, and optimal management of a disaster and its consequences. The Committee’s analysis was based on the testimony it heard from 13 experts— scientists and representatives of associations and advocacy groups—and its review of the literature, including operational feedback reports.
Its response to the Minister focused on the assessment of the health, social, environmental, and economic impacts of disasters and on their operational feedback (defined as the systematic analysis of a past event to draw lessons for the management of the risk), as practiced in France. It presents the results of the literature review about the consequences of disasters, expert’s views on the current utility and limitations of impact assessments and operational feedback, the CPP’s discussion of these results, and its recommendations to improve impact assessment and operational feedback of disasters. These recommendations cover preparation for and activation of data collection and operational feedback, financial provisions, coordination of stakeholders, education and training in disaster preparedness, and the distribution and use of data from operational feedback.

Author Biographies

Pierre Verger, MD

Southeastern Health Regional Observatory—Research Unit UMR 912 “Economic & Social Sciences, Health Systems & Societies,” INSERM, 23 rue Stanislas Torrents, 13006, Marseille, France; and IRD, Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France.

Denis Bard, MD, PhD

Ecole des hautes études en santé publique, Laboratoire d’études et de recherches en Environnement et Santé : Avenue du Pr Léon Bernard, F-35043 Rennes cedex, France, 35000 Rennes, France.

Christine Noiville, PhD

CNRS, Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne, UMR 8103, 16 rue de l’Abbé Carton, 75014 Paris, France.

Reza Lahidji

Stene & Lahidji, 9, bd de la Libération 94300 Vincennes, France.


Ramade F: Les catastrophes écologiques. Paris: McGraw-Hill, 1987.

Bongers S, Janssen NA, Reiss B, et al.: Challenges of exposure assessment for health studies in the aftermath of chemical incidents and disasters. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2008; 18: 341-359.

WHO: Environmental Health in Emergencies and Disasters: A Practical Guide.World Health Organisation, 2002.

Noji E: The Public Health Consequences of Disasters. New York Oxford, 1997.

Verger P, Aulagnier M, Schwoebel V, et al.: Démarches épidémiologiques après une catastrophe. Paris: La documentation française, 2005.

Ivanov VK, Gorski AI, Maksioutov MA, et al.: Thyroid cancer incidence among adolescents and adults in the Bryansk region of Russia following the Chernobyl accident. Health Phys. 2003; 84: 46-60.

Bromet E, Dew MA: Review of psychiatric epidemiologic research on disasters. Epidemiol Rev. 1995; 17: 113-119.

Gleser G, Green, BL,Winget C: Prolonged psychological effects of disaster: A Study of Buffalo Creek. New York: Academic Press, 1981.

Goenjian AK, Molina L, Steinberg AM, et al.: Post-traumatic stress and depressive reactions among Nicaraguan adolescents after hurricane Mitch. Am J Psychiatry. 2001; 158: 788-794.

Kessler RC, Galea S, Jones RT, et al.: Mental illness and suicidality after Hurricane Katrina. Bull World Health Organ. 2006; 84: 930-939.

Person C, Tracy M, Galea S: Risk factors for depression after a disaster. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2006; 194: 659-666.

Smith DW, Christiansen EH,Vincent R, et al.: Population effects of the bombing of Oklahoma City. J Okla State Med Assoc. 1999; 92: 193-198.

Smith E, North CS: Post-traumatic stress disorder in natural disasters and technological accidents. In Wilson JP, Raphael B (eds).: International Handbook of traumatic stress syndromes. New York and London: Plenum Press, 1993; 405-419.

Kanzari R, Thoemmes J: Le travail des sapeurs-pompiers dans la crise : le cas de l’explosion d’AZF. In De Terssac G, Gaillard I (eds.): La catastrophe d’AZF: l’apport des sciences humianes et sociales. Paris: Lavoisier, 2008; 276.

Riviere S, Schwoebel V, Lapierre-Duval K, et al.: Predictors of symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder after the AZF chemical factory explosion on 21 September 2001, in Toulouse, France. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008; 62: 455-460.

Verger P, Dab W, Lamping D, et al.: The psychological impact of terrorism: An epidemiologic study of PTSD and associated factors in victims of the 1995-96 bombings in France. Am J Psychiatry 2004; 161: 1384-1389.

Arendt M, Elklit A: Effectiveness of psychological debriefing. Acta Psychiat Scand. 2001; 104: 423-437.

van Emmerik AA, Kamphuis JH, Hulsbosch AM, et al.: Single session debriefing after psychological trauma: A meta-analysis. Lancet. 2002; 360(9335): 766-771.

Berkman L, Kawachi I: Social Epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

Wilkinson R, Marmot M: Social Determinants of Health. The Solid Facts. Genève:WHO, 1998.

Adams RE, Boscarino JA, Galea S: Social and psychological resources and health outcomes after the World Trade Center disaster. Soc Sci Med. 2006; 62: 176-188.

Hobfoll SE: The influence of culture, community, and the nestedself in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Appl Psychol Int Rev 2001; 50: 337-421.

Klinenberg E: Heat Wave. A Social Autopsy of Disaster in Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.

Klinenberg E: Review of heat wave: Social autopsy of disaster in Chicago. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348: 666-667.

Pirard P, Vandentorren S, Pascal M, et al.: Summary of the mortality impact assessment of the 2003 heat wave in France. Euro Surveill. 2005; 10: 153-156.

Semenza JC, Rubin CH, Falter KH, et al.: Heat-related deaths during the July 1995 heat wave in Chicago. N Engl J Med. 1996; 335: 84-90.

Elliott MR, Wang Y, Lowe RA, et al.: Environmental justice: Frequency and severity of US chemical industry accidents and the socioeconomic status of surrounding communities. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004; 58: 24-30.

Lapierre-Duval K, Schwoebel V: Conséquences de l’explosion de l’usine “AZF” le 21 Septembre 2001 sur la vie quotidienne et la santé des habitants de Toulouse. BEH (Bulletin Epidémiologique Hebdomadaire). 2004; 38/39: 188.

Lauga V: Conséquences psychotraumatiques d’une catatsrophe industrielle : l’exemple de la prise en charge psychologique des salariés de l’usine Grande-Paroisee. In de Terssac G, Gaillard I (eds.): La catastrophe d’AZF: l’apport des sciences humaines et sociales. Paris: Lavoisier, 2008; 276.

Bard D, Verger P, Hubert P: Chernobyl, 10 years after: Health consequences. Epidemiol Rev. 1997; 19: 187-204.

Bastien Ventura C, Girin M, Raoul-Duval J: Marées noires et environnement. Paris: Institut Océanographique, 2005.

Wells PG, Butler JN, Hughes JS: Exxon Valdez Oil Spill: Fate and Effects in Alaskan Waters. West Conshohocken: ASTM, 1995.

OECD:Large-Scale Disasters. Lessons Learned. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2004.

Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean: Manual for Estimating the Socio-Economic Effects of Natural Disasters. In United Nations (ed.): Santiago, Chile: United Nations, ECLAC, 1991; 279.

Kilbourne E, Choi K, Jones TS, et al.: Risk factors for heatstroke. A case control study. JAMA. 1982; 247: 3332-3336.

Wybo J-L: Mémento de gestion d’un événement de sécurité. In Armines (ed.). Paris: Ecole nationale des mines de Paris, 2005; 42.

De Terssac G, Gaillard I: La catastrophe d’AZF: l’apport des sciences humaines et sociales. Paris: Lavoisier, 2008.




How to Cite

Verger, MD, P., D. Bard, MD, PhD, C. Noiville, PhD, and R. Lahidji. “Environmental Disasters: Preparing for Impact Assessments and Operational Feedback”. American Journal of Disaster Medicine, vol. 3, no. 6, Nov. 2008, pp. 358-6, doi:10.5055/ajdm.2008.0045.



Case Studies