Ethical implications of diversity in disaster research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5055/ajdm.2012.0096Keywords:
developing countries, disasters, ethics, IRBs, human subjects researchAbstract
Enhancing the effectiveness, efficiency, and fairness of interventions is an increasing source of concern in the field of disaster response. As a result, the expansion of the disaster relief evidence base has been identified as a pressing need. There has been a corresponding increase in discussions of ethical standards and procedures for disaster research. In general, these discussions have focused on elucidating how traditional research ethics concerns can be operationalized in disaster settings. Less attention has been given to the exploration of the ethical implications of heterogeneity within the field of disaster research. Hence, while current efforts to discuss the ethics of disaster research in low-resource settings are very encouraging, it is clear that further initiatives will be crucial to promote the ethical conduct of disaster research. In this article, we explore how the ethical review of disaster research conducted in low-resource settings should account for this diversity. More specifically, we consider how the nature of the project (what?), sociopolitical and physical environment of research sites (where?), temporal proximity to the disaster event (when?), objectives motivating the research (why?), and identity of the stakeholders involved in the research process (who?) all relate to the ethics of disaster research.References
Banatvala N, Zwi AB: Conflict and health. Public health and humanitarian interventions: Developing the evidence base. BMJ. 2000; 321(7253): 101-105.
Zachariah R. Ford N, Draguez B, et al.: Conducting operational research within a non governmentalorganization: The example of Médecins Sans Frontières. Int Health. 2010; 2: 1-8.
Zwi AB, Grove NJ, MacKenzie C, et al.: Placing ethics in the centre: Negotiating new spaces for ethical research in conflict situations. Global Public Health. 2006; 1(3): 264-277.
Hilhorst D: Being good at doing good? Quality and accountability of humanitarian NGOs. Disasters. 2002; 26(3): 193-212.
Goodhand J: Research in conflict zones: Ethics and accountability. Forced Migration Rev. 2000; 8: 12-15.
Collogan LK, Tuma F, Dolan-Sewell R, et al.: Ethical issues pertaining to research in the aftermath of disaster. J Trauma Stress. 2004; 17(5): 363-372.
Reed H: Research Ethics in Complex Humanitarian Emergencies: Summary of a Workshop.Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2002.
Mfutso-Bengo J, Masiye F, Muula A: Ethical challenges in conducting research in humanitarian crisis situations. Malawi Med J. 2008; 20(2): 46-49.
Ausbrooks CYB, Barrett EJ, Martinez-Cosio M: Ethical issues in disaster research: Lessons from Hurricane Katrina. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2009. 28: 93–106.
O’Mathúna DP: Conducting research in the aftermath of disasters: Ethical considerations. J Evid Based Med. 2010; 3(2): 65-75.
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences: International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects, 2002. Available at http://www.cioms.ch/publications/guidelines/guidelines_nov_2002_blurb.htm. Accessed February 5, 2012.
Code of Federal Regulations: Title 45 public welfare. Department of Health and Human Services. Part 46 Protection of Human Subjects, January 2009. Available at http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/ohrpregulations.pdf. Accessed February 5, 2012.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada: Tri-council policy statement: Ethical conduct for research involving humans, December 2010. Available at http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/pdf/eng/tcps2/TCPS_2_FINAL_Web.pdf. Accessed February 5, 2012.
World Medical Association: Declaration on guidelines for continuous quality improvement in health care, October 2009.Available at http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/g10/. Accessed February 5, 2012.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Distinguishing public health research and public health nonresearch, July 2010. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/od/science/integrity/docs/cdc-policydistinguishing-public-health-research-nonresearch.pdf. Accessed February 5, 2012.
Calain P, Fiore N, Poncin M, et al.: Research ethics and international epidemic response: The case of Ebola and Marburg hemorrhagic fevers. Public Health Ethics. 2009; 2(1): 7-29.
Pringle JD, Cole DC: Health research in complex emergencies: A humanitarian imperative. J Acad Ethics. 2009; 7: 115-123.
Leaning J: Ethics of research in refugee populations. Lancet. 2001; 357(9266): 1432-1433.
Zachariah R, Harries AD, Ishikawa N, et al.: Operational research in low-income countries: What, why, and how? Lancet Infect Dis. 2009; 9(11): 711-717.
Hinton Walker P, Garmon Bibb SC, Elberson K: Research issues in preparedness for mass casualty events, disaster, war, and terrorism. Nurs Clin North Am. 2005; 40(3): 551-564.
World Health Organization: Consultation on applied health research priorities in complex emergencies, 2000.Available at https://apps.who.int/eha/trares/research/250398.htm. Accessed February 5, 2012.
Weijer C, Grimshaw JM, Taljaard M, et al.: Ethical issues posed by cluster randomized trials in health research. Trials. 2011; 12: 100.
Mills EJ, Singh S: Health, human rights, and the conduct of clinical research within oppressed populations. Global Health. 2007; 3: 10.
Wessells MG: Do no harm:Toward contextually appropriate psychosocial support in international emergencies. Am Psychol. 2009; 64(8): 842-854.
Del Ben K, McLeish AC, Elkin TD: Research and ethics following a natural disaster: From the public’s point of view. Behav Therapist. 2006; 29: 128-130.
Newman E, Kaloupek DG: The risks and benefits of participating in trauma-focused research studies. J Trauma Stress. 2004; 17(5): 383-394.
Mackenzie C, McDowell C, Pittaway E: Beyond ‘do no harm’: The challengeof constructing ethical relationships in refugee research. J Refug Stud. 2007; 20(2): 299-319.
Hugman R, Pittaway E, Bartolomei L: When ‘do no harm’ is not enough: The ethics of research with refugees and other vulnerable groups. Br J Soc Work. 2011; 4(7): 1271-1287.
Jacobsen K, Landau LB: The dual imperative in refugee research: Some methodological and ethical considerations in social science research on forced migration. Disasters. 2003; 27(3): 185-206.
Chung B, Jones L, Campbell LX, et al.: National recommendations for enhancing the conduct of ethical health research with human participants in post-disaster situations. Ethn Dis. 2008; 18(3): 378-383.
Spiegel PB, Le P, Ververs MT, et al.: Occurrence and overlap of natural disasters, complex emergencies and epidemics during the past decade (1995-2004). Confl Health. 2007; 1: 2.
Galea S, Maxwell AR, Norris F: Sampling and design challenges in studying the mental health consequences of disasters. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2008; 17 (Suppl 2): S21-S28.
Sumathipala A, Jafarey A, De Castro LD, et al.: Ethical issues in post-disaster clinical interventions and research: A developing world perspective. Key Findings from a drafting and consensus generation meeting of the Working Group on Disaster Research and Ethics (WGDRE) 2007. Asian Bioethics Review. 2010; (2)2: 124-142.
Black R: Ethical codes in humanitarian emergencies: From practice to research? Disasters. 2003; 27(2): 95-108.
Ahmad A, Mahmud SM: Philanthropic misconception. Asian Bioethics Rev. 2010; 2(2): 154-161.
Cornwall A, Jewkes R: What is participatory research? Soc Sci Med. 1995; 41(12): 1667-1676.
Pfefferbaum B, North CS: Research with children exposed to disasters. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2008; 17(Suppl 2): S49-S56.
Miller RK: Informed consent in the military: Fighting a losing battle against the anthrax vaccine. Am J Law Med. 2002; 28(2-3): 325-343.
Jesus JE, Michael GE: Ethical considerations of research in disaster- stricken populations. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2009; 24(2): 109-114.
Ginzburg K, Solomon Z: Does one size fit all? The challenges of establishing a coordinating center for research of post-disaster needs assessment. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2008; 17 (Suppl 2): S36-S41.
Tansey CM, Herridge MS, Heslegrave RJ, et al.: A framework for research ethics review during public emergencies. CMAJ. 2010; 182(14): 1533-1537.
Schopper D, Upshur R, Matthys F, et al.: Research ethics review in humanitarian contexts: The experience of the independent ethics review board of Médecins Sans Frontières. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7): e1000115.
Ravinetto R, Buvé A, Halidou T, et al. Double ethical review of North-South collaborative clinical research: Hidden paternalism or real partnership? Trop Med Int Health. 2011; 16(4): 527-530.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright 2007-2023, Weston Medical Publishing, LLC
All Rights Reserved
