Bootstrapping disaster: The challenge of growing and maintaining a cross-sector collaborative network

Aaron Wachhaus, PhD

doi:10.5055/jem.2016.0304

Authors

Aaron Wachhaus, PhD

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.2016.0304

Keywords:

disaster, social network analysis, collaboration

Abstract

This article examines the interaction of nonprofit and private actors with the traditional bureaucratic structures of government in central Pennsylvania's recovery from hurricane Irene and tropical storm Lee. That effort relied heavily on private and nonprofit organizations as drivers of the response and recovery. The author maps the organizations involved in the recovery effort and explores the impact of the recovery effort on those organizations. A social network analysis was conducted and complemented with follow-up interviews with key actors. The network analysis reveals weak communication between sectors and a reliance on nonprofits to deliver services; interviews uncover the challenges of intersectoral collaboration. The author addresses the successes and limitations of the means by which a network of nonprofit efforts were coordinated with federal and state relief efforts and draw lessons for improving future practices. The author finds that this case deviates from theory in several ways that complicated community response and recovery. In particular, the challenges of developing and maintaining a recovery network while simultaneously delivering services placed great strain on several organizations, as well as on the fledgling network as a whole.

Author Biography

Aaron Wachhaus, PhD

College of Public Affairs, University of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland

References

Leroux K, Brandenburger PW, Pandey S: Interlocal service cooperation in U.S. cities: A social network explanation. Public Adm Rev. 2010; 70(2): 268-278.

Donahue A, Joyce P: A framework for analyzing emergency management with an application to federal budgeting. Public Adm Rev. 2001; 61(6): 728-740.

Granito J: Planning for disaster: Emergency management today. NFPA J. 1995; July/August 1995: 42-45.

Keast R, Mandell M, Brown K, et al.: Network structures: Working differently and changing expectations. Public Adm Rev. 2004; 64(3): 363-371.

Comfort L, Ko K, Zagorecki A: Coordination in rapidly evolving disaster response systems: The role of information. Am Behav Sci. 2004; 48(3): 295-313.

Kapucu N: Public-nonprofit partnerships for collective action in dynamic contexts of emergencies. Public Adm. 2006; 84(1): 205-220.

Barabasi A-L: Linked: The New Science of Networks. Cambridge, MA: Perseus, 2002.

Barnes J: Class and committees in a Norwegian island parish. Hum Relations. 1954; 7: 39-58.

Milgram S: The small-world problem. Psychol Today. 1967; 1(1): 61-67.

Acheson J: The Maine lobster market: Between market and hierarchy. J Law Econ Organ. 1985; 1(2): 385-398.

Boyle E: Managing organizational networks: Defining the core. Manage Decis. 1993; 31(7): 23-27.

Ebers M, Jarillo C: The construction, forms, and consequences of industry networks. Int Stud Manage Organ. 1997; 27(4): 3-21.

Cross R, Parker A: The Hidden Power of Social Networks: Understanding How Work Really Gets Done in Organizations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2004.

Sabatier P, Jenkins-Smith H: An advocacy coalition model of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sci. 1988; 21: 129-168.

van Bueren EM, Klijn E-H, Koppenjan JFM: Dealing with wicked problems in networks: Analyzing an environmental debate from a network perspective. J Public Adm Res Theory. 2003; 13(2): 193-212.

Wasserman S, Faust K: Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

Hay C: The tangled webs we weave’. In Marsh D (ed.): Comparing Policy Networks. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1998.

O'Toole L: Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Adm Rev. 1997; 57(1): 45-52.

Keast R, Mandell MP, Brown K, et al.: Network structures: Working differently and changing expectations. Public Adm Rev. 2004; 64(3): 363-371.

Klijn E-H: Rules as institutional context for decision making in networks: The approach to postwar housing districts in two cities. Adm Soc. 2001; 33(2): 133-164.

Sorensen E: Metagovernance: The changing role of politicians in processes of democratic governance. Am Rev Public Adm. 2006; 36(1): 98-114.

Cigler B: Pre-conditions for the emergence of multicommunity collaborative organizations. Policy Stud Rev. 1999; 16(1): 86-102.

Krueathep W, Riccucci NM, Suwanmala C: Why do agencies work together? Determinants of network formation at the subnational level of government in Thailand. J Public Adm Res Theory. 2010; 20(1): 157-185.

Graddy EA, Chen B: Influences on the size and scope of networks for social service delivery. J Public Adm Res Theory. 2006; 16(4): 533-552.

Smirnov A, Levashova T, Pashkin M, et al.: Disaster response based on production network management tasks. Manage Res News. 2007; 30(11): 829-842.

Townsend FF: The Federal Response to Hurricane Katrina: Lessons Learned. Washington, DC: White House, 2013.

Comfort LK: Shared Risk: Complex Systems in Seismic Response. Pergamon, Turkey: Pergamon, 1999.

Dynes RR, Tierney K. (eds.): Disasters, Collective Behavior, and Social Organizations, Newark, DE: University of Delaware Press, 1994.

Waugh WL: Living with Hazards, Dealing with Disasters: An Introduction to Emergency Management. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe Inc., 1999: 240 p.

Barbier G, Zarafani R, Gao H, et al.: Maximizing benefits from crowdsourced data. Comput Math Organ Theory. 2012; 18(3): 257-279.

Choi SO, Brower RS: When practice matters more than government plans: A network analysis of local emergency management. Adm Soc. 2006; 37(6): 651-678.

Wise CR: Organizing for homeland security after Katrina: Is adaptive management what's missing? Public Adm Rev. 2006; 66(3): 302-318.

U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO): Disaster Management: Improving the Nations Response to Catastrophic Disasters. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1993.

Kapucu N: Non-profit response to catastrophic disasters. Disaster Prevention Manage. 2007; 16(4): 551-561.

Krueger S, McGuire M: A transaction cost explanation of interlocal government collaboration. Paper presented at the Eighth National Public Management Research Conference, September 29 to October 1, 2005, Los Angeles, CA.

Wood C: The nature of metropolitan governance in urban America. A study of cooperation and conflict in the Kansas City region. Adm Soc. 2008; 40(5): 483-501.

Capitalclimate: All-Time Record Wettest Month at Philadelphia. 2011. Available at http://capitalclimate.blogspot.com/2011/08/alltime-record-wettest-month-at.html. Accessed February 27, 2013.

Pennlive: Hurricane Irene Tore Through Central Pennsylvania a Year Ago This Week. 2012. Available at http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2012/08/hurricane_irene_tore_through_c.html.

Accessed February 27, 2013.

NOAA: Remnants of Tropical Storm Lee and the Susquehanna River Basin flooding of September 6-10, 2011. U.S. Department Of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Bohemia, NY: National Weather Service, Eastern Region Headquarters, 2012.

NASA: Hurricane Season 2011: Lee (Gulf of Mexico). 2011. Available at http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hurricanes/archives/2011/h2011_Lee.html. Accessed February 28, 2013.

Avila L, Stewart S: Atlantic hurricanes 2011: All about Irene and Lee. Weatherwise. 2012; 63(5): 34-41.

Grumm R: Heavy Rainfall Associated Frontal Interactions With Tropical Storm Lee 5-8 September 2011. State College, PA: National Weather Service, 2011.

NVOAD: Who We Are: History. Available at http://www.nvoad.org/about-us/our-history/. Accessed February 28, 2013.

Doboneck M: Agencies Starting to Compile Lists of Damages From Tropical Storm Lee. 2011. Available at http:://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2011/09/agencies_starting_to_compile_l.html. Accessed February 28, 2013.

O'Toole LJ Jr, Meier KJ: Desperately seeking Selznick: Cooptation and the dark side of public management in networks. Public Adm Rev. 2004; 64(6): 681-693.

Hanneman R, Riddle M: Introduction to Social Network Methods. Riverside, CA: University of California, Riverside, 2005.

Scott J: Social Network Analysis: A Handbook, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2005.

Science of Networks in Communities Laboratory: C-IKNOW: Cyber-infrastructure for Inquiring Knowledge Networks on the Web. Evanston IL: Northwestern University. Available at http://ciknow.northwestern.edu. Accessed May 12, 2015.

Bovaird T: Beyond engagement and participation: User and community co-production of public services. Public Adm Rev. 2007; 67(5): 846-860.

Klijn E-H: Analyzing and managing policy processes in complex networks: A theoretical examination of the concept policy network and its problems. Adm Soc. 1996; 28(1): 90-119.

Lejano R: The phenomenon of collective action: Modeling institutions as structures of care. Public Adm Rev. 2008; 68(3): 491-504.

Scharpf F: Games real actors could play. J Theor Politics. 1994; 2(4): 27-53.

Wachhaus A: Governance as a framework to support informatics. Innovation J. 2011; 16(1): 1-14.

Kirlin J, Kirlin K: Strengthening effective government-citizen connections through greater civic engagement. Public Adm Rev. 2002; 62: 80-85.