Validation of a novel irritant gas syndrome triage algorithm
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5055/ajdm.2018.0284Keywords:
triage, chemical triage algorithm, methods for disaster researchAbstract
Objective: Our objective was to validate a novel irritant gas syndrome agent (IGSA) triage algorithm for use in an emergency department (ED). We assessed efficiency, accuracy, and precision of our IGSA triage algorithm based on signs/symptoms of actual patients.
Design: After characterizing the signs/symptoms of an actual IGSA exposure event, we developed and validated the IGSA triage algorithm using a simulated computer exercise to compare the IGSA triage algorithm to the preferred hospital triage algorithm, the Emergency Severity Index (ESI).
Setting: This study was a simulated computer exercise using surveys developed in Research Electronic Data Capture software. Nurse volunteers simulated triaging 298 patients.
Participants: Patient data included 146 patients treated during the disaster as well as 152 unexposed patients. Twenty-six nurse volunteers were assigned to triage the patients using one of the algorithms in the simulated computer exercise.
Main Outcome Measure(s): The precision of the IGSA triage algorithm was 0.82 (confidence interval [CI] 0.78-0.85) and ESI 0.73 (CI 0.69-0.77). Weighted κ for ESI and IGSA accuracy for exposed patients was 0.32 (95% CI 0.26-0.37) and 0.81 (95% CI 0.77-0.85), respectively.
Results: The IGSA triage algorithm was more accurate and precise than the ESI algorithm for triaging patients exposed to an irritant gas.
Conclusions: This study validates the IGSA triage algorithm as the basis for the development of a prototype software application to quickly identify victims of a chemical disaster and triage patients efficiently and accurately with the potential to dramatically improve the processing of patients in EDs.
References
ChemicalSafetyFacts.org.: Understanding risks and hazard when it comes to chemicals. 2017. Available at https://www.chemicalsafetyfacts.org/chemistry-context/understanding-risk/?lang=CIn8-8ywktICFY6FswodBGgKMA. Accessed February 15, 2017.
Hartong M, Goel R, Wijesekera D: A risk assessment framework for TIH train routing. 2007. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Duminda_Wijesekera/publication/228345101_A_Risk_Assessment_Framework_for_TIH_Train_Routing/links/00463522db8bcb0bc2000000.pdf. Accessed June 4, 2017.
Culley JM, Svendsen E: A review of the literature on the validity of mass casualty triage systems with a focus on chemical exposures. Am J Disaster Med. 2014; 9(2): 137-150.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Hospital emergency departments get tips from AHRQ on how to reduce crowding and better triage patients. Research Activities. 2012; 379.
DeMers G, Kahn C, Johansson P, et al.: Secure scalable disaster electronic medical record and tracking system. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013; 28(5): 498-501.
Culley JM, Svendsen E, Craig J, et al.: A validation study of 5 triage systems using data from the 2005 Graniteville, South Carolina, chlorine spill. J Emerg Nur. 2014; 40(5): 453-460.
Aacharya RP, Gastmans C, Denier Y: Emergency department triage: An ethical analysis. BMC Emerg Med. 2011; 11: 16.
Culley J, Svendsen E, Craig J, et al.: Triage effectiveness during a chemical incident. Paper presented at: CANS 2012 State of the Science Congress on Nursing Research Conference 2012; Washington, DC.
Culley J, Svendsen E, Craig J, et al.: Are current triage methods effective for all hazards mass casualty events? Paper presented at: Southern Nursing Research Conference 2012; New Orleans, LA.
Craig JB, Culley JM, Tavakoli A, et al.: Gleaning data from disaster: A hospital-based data mining method to studying all-hazard triage after a chemical disaster. Am J Disaster Med. 2013; 8(2): 97-111.
U.S. National Library of Medicine: Wireless information system for emergency responders (WISER). U.S. National Library of Medicine. 2015. Available at https://wiser.nlm.nih.gov/index.html. Accessed September 1, 2016.
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services: Chemical hazards emergency medical management (CHEMM). U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. 2015. Available at https://chemm.nlm.nih.gov/index.html. Accessed September 2, 2016.
ESI Triage Research Team: Areas of ESI algorithm. 2017. Available at http://www.esitriage.org/algorithm.asp. Accessed June 6, 2017.
SAS for Windows 9.4 [computer program]. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc., 2013.
Tavakoli A, Culley J, Richter J, et al.: Using macro in SAS® to calculate Kappa and 95% CI for several pairs of nurses of chemical triage. Paper presented at: SAS® Global Forum, April 2-5, 2017; Orlando, FL.
Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al.: Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009; 42(2): 377-381.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright 2007-2023, Weston Medical Publishing, LLC
All Rights Reserved
