Efficacy of ex vivo decontamination methods for chemical warfare agents on military working dog (Canis familiaris) cadaver skin tissue
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5055/ajdm.0489Keywords:
military working dog, decontamination, chemical warfare agents, search and rescueAbstract
Objective: Evidence-based evaluation of working dog decontamination is needed following several contemporary events involving threats for contamination with hazardous materials. The purpose of this study was to describe the behavior of ex vivo neat chemical warfare agent exposure on military working dog breed-specific canine cadaver tissue and measure the potential effectiveness of standard and potential alternative decontamination methods.
Methods: Previously frozen German Shepherd, Belgian Malinois, and Labrador Retriever full-thickness skin tissue with attached hair coat was used to test the efficacy of decontamination procedures in the removal of sulfur mustard blister agent (HD) and organophosphate nerve agent (VX) chemical warfare contaminants. Four different decontamination treatments were evaluated: none, microfiber towel only (MFTO), low-water method (LWM), and high-water method (HWM). The lesser/nonhaired inner ear, paw pads, and underbelly were evaluated using a Reactive Skin Decontamination Lotion treatment.
Results: The MFTO condition showed a significant removal amount of HD and VX agent from hair coats. An average of 83.1 percent HD and 80.9 percent VX reduction in the initially applied agent was observed with microfiber towel wipes in all tested breeds. As tested, the MFTO method resulted in less recovered agent than the 4 percent chlorhexidine scrub LWM. The HWM resulted in an average of 80.3 percent HD and 98.7 percent VX reduction in the initially applied agent.
Conclusion: The data suggest that the MFTO method alone may be an effective field expedient decontamination method for VX and HD in situations with limited water resources.
References
Aker JA: How DHA plans to boost battlefield care for military working dogs. Military Health System. 2021. Available at https://www.health.mil/News/Articles/2021/10/20/How-DHA-Plans-to-Boost-Battlefield-Care-for-Military-Working-Dogs. Accessed March 23, 2022.
Jarrett CL, Brathwaite M, Gogal RM, et al.: Working dog service, harmful agent exposure and decontamination. Front Vet Sci. 2022; 9: 1-5. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.892998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.892998
DOD Military Working Dog Veterinary Service: Medical Care of Military Working Dogs by Handlers: Handler Training Manual. Lackland, TX: DOD Military Working Dog Veterinary Service, 2015.
Perry EB, Discepolo DR, Jenkins EK, et al.: An assessment of working canine contamination from standing liquid hazards during a simulated disaster search scenario. J Vet Behav. 2021; 43: 1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jveb.2021.01.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2021.01.004
Powell EB, Apgar GA, Jenkins EK, et al.: Handler training improves decontamination of working canines with oil-based exposure in field conditions using disposable kits. J Vet Behav. 2019; 29: 4-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jveb.2018.08.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2018.08.002
McMichael MA, Singletary M, Akingbemi BT: Toxidromes for working dogs. Front Vet Sci. 2022; 9: 1-12. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.898100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.898100
Otto CM, Franz MA, Kellogg B, et al.: Field treatment of search dogs: Lessons learned from the world trade center disaster. J Vet Emerg Crit Care. 2002; 12(1): 33-41. DOI: 10.1046/j.1435-6935.2002.00004.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1435-6935.2002.00004.x
Venable E, Discepolo D, Powell E, et al.: An evaluation of current working canine decontamination procedures and methods for improvement. J Vet Behav. 2017; 21: 53-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.jveb.2017.07.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2017.07.008
Gordon LE: Handler and canine deployment summary: Hurricane sandy. Urban Search and Rescue Group, 2012.
Gordon LE: Hurricane deployment triplet: Canine health data report. Urban Search and Rescue Group, 2017.
Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons: OPCW releases first report by investigation and identification team. OPCW. 2020. Available at https://www.opcw.org/media-centre/news/2020/04/opcw-releases-first-report-investigation-and-identification-team. Accessed February 10, 2022.
Lalain T, Mantooth B, Shue M, et al.: Chemical Contaminant and Decontaminant Test Methodology Source Document. 2nd ed. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: Edgewood Chemical Biological Center, 2012. DOI: 10.21236/ada566601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA566601
Munro NB, Talmage SS, Griffin GD, et al.: The sources, fate, and toxicity of chemical warfare agent degradation products. Environ Health Perspect. 1999; 107(12): 933-974. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.99107933. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.99107933
Venn EC, Rodriguez R, Shearer J, et al.: A field decontamination of working dogs in a chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) environment. J Vet Emerg Crit Care. 2020; 30(S1): S1-S34.
Chilcott RP, Larner J, Durrant A, et al.: Evaluation of US federal guidelines (primary response incident scene management [PRISM]) for mass decontamination of casualties during the initial operational response to a chemical incident. Ann Emerg Med. 2019; 73(6): 671-684. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.06.042. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.06.042
Kassouf N, Syed S, Larner J, et al.: Evaluation of absorbent materials for use as ad hoc dry decontaminants during mass casualty incidents as part of the UK’s initial operational response (IOR). PLoS One. 2017; 12(2): e0170966-15. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170966. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170966
Sattar SA, Maillard J-Y: The crucial role of wiping in decontamination of high-touch environmental surfaces: Review of current status and directions for the future. Am J Infect Control. 2013; 41(5): S97-S104. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.10.032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2012.10.032
Perry EB, Discepolo DR, Liang SY, et al.: Removal of aerosolized contaminants from working canines via a field wipe-down procedure. Animals. 2021; 11(1): 120-129. DOI: 10.3390/ani11010120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010120
Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, Field Research and Consultation Group: Microfiber. University of Washington. 2011. Available at https://deohs.washington.edu/sites/default/files/images/microfiber_fact_sheet_11-21-11.pdf. Accessed March 23, 2022.
Moore G, Griffith C: A laboratory evaluation of the decontamination properties of microfibre cloths. J Hosp Infect. 2006; 64(4): 379-385. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2006.08.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2006.08.006
Welle MM, Wiener DJ: The hair follicle: A comparative review of canine hair follicle anatomy and physiology. Toxicol Pathol. 2016; 44(4): 564-574. DOI: 10.1177/0192623316631843. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623316631843
Whitaker DT, Ostrander EA: Hair of the dog: Identification of a cis-regulatory module predicted to influence canine coat composition. Genes. 2019; 10(5): 323. DOI: 10.3390/genes10050323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10050323
Reynolds CM, Ringelberg DB, Perry LB, et al.: Performance of an emerging all-weather decontamination solution against nerve and mustard agent simulants at subfreezing temperatures. Cold Regions Sci Technol. 2008; 52(2): 244-253. DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2007.02.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2007.02.003
Headquarters, Department of the Army: Army techniques publication 3-11.32. Army Publishing Directorate—Army Technical Publications. 2016. Available at https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_c/ARN33545-ATP_3-11.32-002-WEB-3.pdf. Accessed August 4, 2022.
Soric S, Belanger MP, Wittnich C: A method for decontamination of animals involved in floodwater disasters. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2008; 232(3): 364-370. DOI: 10.2460/javma.232.3.364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.232.3.364
Joint Chiefs of Staff: Joint publication 3-28|Defense Support of Civil Authorities. 2018. Available at https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/pubs/jp3_28.pdf. Accessed August 4, 2022.
Miao H, Fu J, Qian Z, et al.: How does paw pad of canine attenuate ground impacts? A multi-layer cushion system. Biol Open. 2017; 1889-1896. DOI: 10.1242/bio.024828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.024828
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright 2007-2025, Weston Medical Publishing, LLC and American Journal of Disaster Medicine. All Rights Reserved.
