Public health law and disaster medicine: Understanding the legal environment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5055/ajdm.2007.0013Keywords:
public health emergencies, disasters, state sovereignty, governmental coercion, de facto con-stitutional empowerment, separation of powers, limit-ed powers, federalism, state police powers, general and federal declarations of emergency, the Model State EmAbstract
Disaster medicine specialists, policy makers, and the public often feel frustrated when they encounter the complex legal framework that surrounds public health emergencies and disasters. Such a framework is particularly difficult to understand when one considers that the federal government has no express powers over public health or disaster management. In fact, under the US Constitution, the states, rather than the federal government, possess public health governance. Although public health sovereignty formally resides within the states, and notwithstanding the federal government’s lack of express constitutional powers over public health crises and disaster management, the federal government has gradually taken on a greater leadership role in managing public health emergencies. In order to clarify the state and federal responsibilities surrounding public health emergencies and disasters, this article explores necessary and pertinent legal topics. These topics include public health duties, public health disasters, state sovereignty, governmental coercion, de facto constitutional empowerment, separation of powers, limited powers, federalism, state police powers, general and federal declarations of emergencies, the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act (MSEHPA), and public health and national security.References
Fineberg H: The Population Approach to Public Health. Association of Schools of Public Health Web site. Available at www.asph.org/document.cfm?page=724. Accessed April 3, 2007.
Institute of Medicine: The Future of Public Health. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 1988.
Gostin LO: Public health law: A renaissance. J Law Med Ethics. 2002; 30(2): 136-140.
Hodge JG Jr: Bioterrorism law and policy: Critical choices in public health. J Law Med Ethics. 2002; 30(2): 254-261.
Gostin LO: Public Health Law: Power, Duty, Restraint. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.
Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 US 11 (1905).
Grad FP: Public Health Law Manual, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, 1990.
Garrett L: The Coming Plague: Newly Emerging Diseases in a World Out of Balance. New York: Farrar, Strauss, Giroux, 1994.
Gostin LO: Conceptualizing the field after September 11th: Foreword to a symposium on public health law. KY Law J. 2002; 90: 791-809.
Puzio D: An overview of public health in the new millenium: Individual liberty vs. public safety. J Law Health. 2003-2004; 18(2): 173-198.
Gostin LO, Hodge JG: The public health improvement process in Alaska: Toward a model public health law. Alaska Law Review. 2000; 17: 77.
Gostin LO, Burris S, Lazzarini Z: The law and the public’s health: A study of infectious disease law in the United States. Columbia Law Rev. 1999; 99(1): 59-128.
Epstein RA: Let the shoemaker stick to his last: A defense of the “old” public health. Perspect Biol Med. 2003; 46(3 Suppl): S138- S159.
Gostin LO, Bloche MG: The politics of public health: A response to Epstein. Perspect Biol Med. 2003; 46(3 Suppl): S160-S175.
Fidler DP: SARS, public health, and global governance: Constitutional outlines of public health’s new world order. Temple Law Rev. 2004; 77: 247.
Chemerinsky E: Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies. New York: Aspen, 1997.
Areen J, Goldberg S, King PA, et al.: Law, Science, and Medicine. Eagan, MN: West Publishing, 1996.
Hodge JG Jr: The role of new federalism and public health law. J Law Health. 1997-1998; 12(2): 309-357.
McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 US (4 Wheat.) 323-324 (1819).
Freund E: The Police Power: Public Policy and Constitutional Rights. Chicago: Callaghan & Co., 1904.
New York v. United States, 505 US 157 (1992).
Reuben RC: The new federalism. ABA J. 1995; April: 76-77.
Wilkes DE: The new federalism in criminal procedure: State court evasion of the burger court. KY Law J. 1974; 62: 421.
City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 US 507 (1997).
United States v. Lopez, 514 US 549 (1995).
National League of Cities v. Usery, 426 US 833 (1976).
City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Adver., 499 US 365 (1991).
Printz v. United States, 521 US 898 (1997).
US Constitutional Amendment X.
Madison J: The federalist papers, No. 45, 292-293. In Rossiter C (ed.): The Federalist Papers. New York: New American Library, 1961.
22 US 1 (1824).
Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1, 203.
Model State Emergency Health Powers Act § 1-104(m) (December 21, 2001).
US Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services Administration: Emergency System for Advance Registration of Volunteer Health Professionals: Legal and Regulatory Issues Report. Health Resources and Services Administration Web site. Available at www.hrsa.gov/esarvhp/ legregissues/default.htm. Accessed April 3, 2007.
Hodge JG Jr, Gable LA, Calves SH: The legal framework for meeting surge capacity through the use of volunteer health professionals during public health emergencies and other disasters. J Contemp Health Law Policy. 2005; 22(1): 5-71.
42 U.S.C. § § 5120-5206 (2002).
US Department of Homeland Security: National Response Plan. US Department of Homeland Security Web site. Available at www.dhs.gov/xprepresp/committees/editorial_0566.shtm. Accessed April 20, 2007.
42 U.S.C. § 5120-5206 (2001).
42 U.S.C. § § 5122(1), 5191(2001).
42 U.S.C. § § 5170, 5191 (2001).
42 U.S.C. § 5122(2) (2001).
42 U.S.C. 247d (2001).
Erickson DL, Gostin LO, Street J, et al.: The power to act: Two model state statutes. J Law Med Ethics. 2002; 30(3 Suppl): 57-62.
Gostin LO: When terrorism threatens health: How far are limitations on personal and economic liberties justified? Fla Law Rev. 2003; 55(5): 1105-1170.
Bruce J: Bioterrorism meets privacy: An analysis of the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act and the HIPAA privacy rule. Ann Health Law. 2003; 12(1): 75-120, table of contents.
The Center for Law & the Public’s Health at Georgetown & Johns Hopkins Universities: The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act: Legislative Surveillance Table. Available at www. publichealthlaw.net/MSEHPA/MSEHPA%20Surveillance.pdf. Accessed April 3, 2007.
US Const. Art. I, § 8.
US Const. pmbl.
US Const. Art. II, § 2.
Buchsbaum LL: The US public health response to bioterrorism: Need for a stronger legislative approach. J Med Law. 2002; 7(1): 1.
United Nations Non-Governmental Liaison Service: 57th Session of the World Health Assembly. UN Non-Governmental Liaison Service Web site. Available at www.un-ngls.org/documents/ text/go.between/gb103.htm#47. Accessed April 3, 2007.
Heymann DL: SARS and emerging infectious diseases: A challenge to place global solidarity above national sovereignty. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2006; 35(5): 350-353
World Health Organization: The World Health Report 2003: Shaping the Future. World Health Organization Web site. Available at www.who.int/whr/2003/en/whr03_en.pdf. Accessed April 3, 2007.
Geneva Conference for the Supervision of the International Traffic in Arms: Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare. Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons Web site. Available at www.opcw.org/html/db/cwc/ more/geneva_protocol.html. Accessed April 20, 2007.
The Biological and Toxic Weapons Convention: Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction. The Biological and Toxic Weapons Convention Web site. Available at www.opbw.org. Accessed April 3, 2007.
Fidler DP: Public health and national security in the global age: Infectious diseases, bioterrorism, and realpolitik. George Washington International Law Review. 2003; 35: 787.
Parmet WE: From Slaughter-House to Lochner: The rise and fall of the constitutionalization of public health. Am J Leg Hist. 1996; 40: 476-505.
Kindhauser MK: Global Defense Against the Infectious Disease Threat. World Health Organization Web site. Available at www.who.int/infectious-disease-news/cds2002/index.html. Accessed April 3, 2007.
Howard-Jones N: Origins of international health work. Br Med J. 1950; 1(4661): 1032-1037.
The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria: NGOs and Civil Society. The Global Fund Web site. Available at www.theglobalfund.org/en/partners/ngo/default.asp. Accessed April 3, 2007.
Fidler DP: Fighting the Axis of Illness: Human rights, HIV/AIDS, and US foreign policy. Harv Hum Rights J. 2004; 17: 99- 136.
National Intelligence Council: The Global Infectious Disease Threat and Its Implications for the United States. National Intelligence Estimate 99-17D. Available at www.fas.org/irp/ threat/nie99-17d.htm. Accessed April 3, 2007.
Pannenborg CO: A New International Health Order: An Inquiry into the International Relations of World Health and Medical Care. Alblasserdam, the Netherlands: Alphen aan den Rijn, 1979.
World Health Organization International Health Regulations Revision Project: Global Crises—Global Solutions: Managing Public Health Emergencies of International Concern Through the Revised International Health Regulations. World Health Organization Web site. Available at www.who.int/csr/resources/ publications/ihr/whocdsgar20024.pdf. Accessed April 3, 2007.
Shalala DE: Bioterrorism: How prepared are we? Emerg Infect Dis. 1999; 5(4): 492-493.
Sutton V: Bioterrorism preparation and response legislation— the struggle to protect states’ sovereignty while preserving national security. Georgetown Public Policy Review. 2001; 6: 92-103. 1. Fineberg H: The Population Approach to Public Health. Association of Schools of Public Health Web site. Available at www.asph.org/document.cfm?page=724. Accessed April 3, 2007.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright 2007-2023, Weston Medical Publishing, LLC
All Rights Reserved
