Trend analysis of disaster health articles in peer-reviewed publications pre- and post-9/11
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5055/ajdm.2008.0046Keywords:
disaster medicine, research methodology, publications, trend analysisAbstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to determine which journals publish medical disaster-related work, their individual focus, and publication volume preand post-9/11.
Methods: PubMed and Google Scholar were searched using key words to identify peer-review journals (print or electronic) publishing medical and public health disaster-related manuscripts. All medical journals with an average volume of at least five disaster- related publications per year over the 11-year study period (1996-2006) were selected. Identified journals were categorized as either general or specialty medical, or disaster health dedicated. All disaster-related articles in each journal were identified and classified according to 11 subtopics.
Results: Of 16 journals meeting entry criteria, 10 were disaster dedicated. Of these, only six existed pre-9/11. Only six general journals (JAMA, American Journal of Public Health, The Lancet, New England Journal of Medicine, Annals of Emergency Medicine, Academic Emergency Medicine) had sufficient publications for analysis. Of the 2,899 disaster articles identified, 1,769 (61 percent) were from the dedicated journals. Publications increased by 320 percent in the general/subspecialty journals and 145 percent for disaster- specific journals in the 5-year period post-9/11 (2002-2006) versus the previous 5-year period (1996- 2000). Among the dedicated journals, Journal of Prehospital and Disaster Medicine published the most (21 percent), followed by Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal (18 percent). Among the general/subspecialty journals, The Lancet published the most (33 percent), followed by JAMA (28 percent) and Annals of Emergency Medicine (18 percent). These journals published the most pre- and post- 9/11. Bioterrorism (36 percent) and Preparedness (18 percent) were the most frequent topic areas for the general/ subspecialty journals, while General Disasters (38 percent) and Preparedness (27 percent) were of the highest interest for the dedicated journals.The greatest increase in the proportion of publications pre- and post-9/11 was by the New England Journal of Medicine (2,340 percent) and Academic Emergency Medicine (1,275 percent). Individual journals appear to emphasize particular subtopic areas.
Conclusions: Interest in publishing medical disaster- related articles has increased tremendously since 9/11 in both general/subspecialty journals as well as disaster-dedicated medical journals. Some journals focus on certain topics. Details of this study should help authors identify appropriate journals for their manuscript submissions.
References
United States of America: Homeland Security Presidential Directive 21.Available at www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/10/20071018-10.html. Accessed February 24, 2008.
DerSimonian R, Charette LJ, McPeek B, et al.: Reporting on methods in clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 1982; 306: 1332-1337.
Thakur A,Wang EC, Chiu TT, et al.: Methodology standards associated with quality reporting in clinical studies in pediatric surgery journals. J Pediatr Surg. 2001; 36: 1160-1164.
Kelen GD, Brown CG, Moser M, et al.: Reporting methodology protocols in three acute care journals. Ann Emerg Med. 1985; 14: 880-884.
Schumm LP, Fisher JS, Thisted RA, et al.: Clinical trials in general surgical journals: are methods better reported? Surgery. 1999; 125: 41-45.
Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW: Clinical research in general medical journals: A 30 year perspective. N Engl J Med. 1979; 301: 180-183.
Popcock SJ, Hughes MD, Lee RJ: Statistical problems in the reporting of clinical trials. A survey of three medical journals. N Engl J Med. 1987; 317: 426-432.
Brown CG, Kelen GD, Moser M, et al.: Methodology reporting in three acute care journals: Replication and reliability. Ann Emerg Med. 1985; 14: 986-991.
Walter CJ, Dumville JC, Hewitt CE, et al.: The quality of trials in operative surgery. Ann Surg. 2007; 246: 1104-1109.
Brown CG, Kelen GD, Ashton JJ, et al.: The beta error and sample size determination in clinical trials in emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med. 1987; 16(2): 183-187.
Lounsbury JW, Roisum KG, Pokorny L, et al.: An analysis of topic areas and topic trends in the Community Mental Health Journal from 1965 through 1977. Community Ment Health J. 1979; 15: 267-276.
Duncan DF: Health psychology and community psychology: A comparison through content analysis of representative journals. Psychol Rep. 1991; 69: 1225-1226.
Elkins PD, Roberts MC: Journal of Pediatric Psychology: A content analysis of articles over its first 10 years. J Pediatr Psychol. 1988; 13: 575-594.
Dimitroff A: Educational services in health sciences libraries: A content analysis of the literature, 1987-1994. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1995; 83: 420-424.
Armstrong L, Stansfield J: A content analysis of the professional journal of the British Society of Speech Therapists. I. The first 10 years. Spotlight on “Speech” 1935-1945. Eur J Disord Commun. 1996; 31: 91-105.
Clark WM, Serovich JM: Twenty years and still in the dark? Content analysis of articles pertaining to gay, lesbian, and bisexual issues in marriage and family therapy journals. J Marital Fam Ther. 1997; 23: 239-253.
Rychetnik L, Nutbeam D, Hawe P: Lessons from a review of publications in three health promotion journals from 1989 to 1994. Health Educ Res. 1997; 12: 491-504.
Hawley DR, Geske S: The use of theory in family therapy research: A content analysis of family therapy journals. J Marital Fam Ther. 2000; 26: 17-22.
Wenger L, Malone R, Bero L: The cigar revival and the popular press: A content analysis, 1987-1997. Am J Public Health. 2001; 91: 288-291.
Gregory D: Four decades of music therapy behavioral research designs: A content analysis of Journal of Music Therapy articles. J Music Ther. 2002; 39: 56-71.
Day FC, Schriger DL,Todd C, et al.: The use of dedicated methodology and statistical reviewers for peer review: A content analysis of comments to authors made by methodology and regular reviewers. Ann Emerg Med. 2002; 40: 329-333.
Stojanowski CM, Buikstra JE: Research trends in human osteology: A content analysis of papers published in the American Journal of Physical Anthropology. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2005; 128: 98-109.
Honeycutt ED Jr, Paul KE: An analysis of Health Marketing Quarterly 1991-2002. Health Mark Q. 2004; 21: 77-87.
Weiner B, White W: The Journal of Inebriety (1876-1914): History, topical analysis, and photographic images. Addiction. 2007; 102: 15-23.
Jones JD: The use of control groups in music therapy research:A content analysis of articles in the Journal of Music Therapy. J Music Ther. 2006; 43: 334-355.
Levsky ME, Rosin A, Coon TP, et al.: A descriptive analysis of authorship within medical journals, 1995-2005. South Med J. 2007; 100: 371-375.
Abramson DM, Morse SS, Garrett AL, et al.: Public health disaster research: Surveying the field, defining its future. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2007; 1: 57-62.
Burkle FM, Greenough PG: Impact of public health emergencies on modern disaster taxonomy, planning, and response. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008; 2: e1-e8.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright 2007-2023, Weston Medical Publishing, LLC
All Rights Reserved
