Longitudinal expandable shelter for medical response during disasters
Keywords:medical shelter, disaster management, new technology, field rescue
Introduction: During medical emergencies, hospitals represent the final point of the whole rescue process. Therefore, effective health mobile structures have to be inserted between hospitals and the place of the event with the aim of giving the best of cures (using appropriate and easy to use equipment) for a safer and faster evacuation to hospitals.
Methods: Literature review and national and international disaster medicine standards were the basis for this study to provide clinical, hygienical, and organizational needs to satisfy for the medical structure design. Project requirements have been obtained by analyzing structural, organizational, and clinical process necessities. Structural requirements respond to the possibility of installation on every ground type, resistance to every weather condition, and necessity of easy and fast transportation. Technological equipment is obtained from clinical evaluation for patient stabilization.
Results: The designed structure results to be a longitudinal expandable shelter (LES) for medical emergencies response organized in three internal functional areas. Possibility of automatic expandability allows rapid transportation and easy deployment. The functional internal organization provides three areas: “Diagnostic,” “Therapeutic,” and “Pre-evacuation monitoring.” Further, longitudinal expandability supports the basic hygienical rules in healthcare processes allowing the unidirectional flow of casualties from dirtier to cleaner areas of the structure.
Conclusions: LES represents the answer to expressed requisites by disaster medicine standards and guidelines. It aims to provide an efficient and effective support for sanitary aid in response to disasters or emergencies, by improving aspects related to effectiveness, hygiene, and quality of clinical performances especially for highest critical cases.
Husum H: Effects of early prehospital life support to war injured: The Battle of Jalalabad, Afghanistan. Prehosp Disaster Med. 1999; 14(2): 75-48.
Prentice AT, Music L: Prehospital transport time and mode of transportation in Zenica, Bosnia. Prehosp Disaster Med. 1996; 11(2): 130-133.
Johnson K, Pearce F,Westenskow D, et al.: Clinical evaluation of the Life Support for Trauma and Transport (LSTAT™) platform. Crit Care. 2002; 6: 439-446.
Auf der Heide E, Eyre A, Fertel N, et al.: 5th Asia-Pacific Conference on Disaster Medicine. Theme 1. Disaster coordination and management: Summary and action plan. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2001; 16(1): 22-25.
Dara SI, Ashton RW, Farmer JC, et al.:Worldwide disaster medical response: An historical perspective. Crit Care Med. 2005; 33(Suppl.): S2-S6.
Grissom TE, Farmer JC: The provision of sophisticated critical care beyond the hospital: Lessons from physiology and military experiences that apply to civil disaster medical response. Crit Care Med. 2005; 33(Suppl.): S13-S21.
Loria-Castellanos J, Rocha-Luna JM, Ávila GM: Reanimation unit experience of a second-level hospital in Mexico City. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2006; 21(4): 242-248.
American College of Surgeons: Advanced Trauma Life Support® ATLS Manual. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons, 2008. http://www.facs.org/trauma/atls/index.html.
Walcher F,Kortüm S, Kirschning T, et al.: Optimized management of polytraumatized patients by prehospital ultrasound. Unfallchirurg. 2002; 105(11): 986-994.
Paolini P: Proceedings of the Conference “Il Soccorso Integrato” [Integrated Rescue], Florence, Italy. May 15-17, 2008.
Briggs SM: Disaster management teams. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2005; 11: 585-589.
Copyright 2007-2023, Weston Medical Publishing, LLC
All Rights Reserved