Design and validation of a hospital emergency department preparedness questionnaire for radiation accidents, nuclear accidents, and nuclear terrorism in Iran
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5055/ajdm.2020.0377Keywords:
preparedness, emergency department, hospital, radiation accidents, nuclear accidents, terrorismAbstract
Background and objectives: Radiation accidents can cause numerous challenges to hospitals, the appropriate medical responses to which may save the lives of countless people. The present study aimed at the design and validation of an Emergency Department preparedness questionnaire for hospital emergency departments (EDs) in the case of radiation accidents, nuclear accidents, and nuclear terrorism in Iran.
Materials and methods: This multistage cross-sectional study was conducted in 2019. The questionnaire items were created with the reference to article reviews and expert judgement. The validity of the questionnaire was assessed through face, content, and construct validities. Additionally, its reliability was estimated using measures of internal consistency and stability, namely Cronbach’s alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). To this end, the questionnaire was completed by the ED staff in the hospitals of Iran.
Results: The proposed 48-item questionnaire consisted of three themes: staff preparedness, stuff preparedness, and structure preparedness. The face and content validities were confirmed by expert judgement. All items remained with content validity ratio (CVR) > 0.7 and the mean content validity index (CVI) = 0.891. The overall Cronbach’s alpha and ICC were 0.781 and 0.709, respectively for the whole questionnaire.
Conclusion: Hospital ED preparedness in radiation and nuclear accidents requires readiness of staff, stuff, and structure of the ED, the consideration of which will properly respond to radiation and nuclear accidents. Thus, upstream organizations like the Ministry of Health and the Emergency Organization should oblige hospital EDs to make themselves be more prepared by codifying certain imperative laws and policies.
References
Kollek D: Canadian emergency department preparedness for a nuclear, biological or chemical event. Can J Emerg Med. 2003; 5: 18-26.
Moore BL, Geller RJ, Clark C: Hospital preparedness for chemical and radiological disasters. Emerg Med Clin. 2015; 33: 37-49.
Andersen SS: Assessment of Detroit Hospital Preparedness for Response to an Improvised Nuclear Attack: Walden University; 2016.
Hick JL, Weinstock DM, Coleman CN, et al.: Health care system planning for and response to a nuclear detonation. Disaster Med Pub Health Preparedness. 2011; 5: S73-S88.
Becker SM, Middleton SA: Improving hospital preparedness for radiological terrorism: Perspectives from emergency department physicians and nurses. Disaster Med Pub Health Preparedness. 2008; 2: 174-184.
Khankeh H: Designing a comprehensive model for health disaster management. PhD dissertation [in Persian]; Iran: University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences; 2007.
Jasper E, Miller M, Sweeney B, et al.: Preparedness of hospitals to respond to a radiological terrorism event as assessed by a full-scale exercise. J Public health Manage Pract. 2005; Suppl: S11-S16.
DeVon HA, Block ME, Moyle-Wright P, et al.: A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. J Nurs Scholarship. 2007; 39: 155-64.
Lacasse Y, Godbout C, Series F: Health-related quality of life in obstructive sleep apnoea. Eur Respir J. 2002; 19: 499-503.
Ghazaei S: Work-Related Diseases and Complains. In: Ed T, editor. Tehran, Iran: Tehran University Press; 1992.
Pasha Sharifi H: Psychometrics and Mental Verification Princioles. In: Ed T, editor. Tehran, Iran: Roshd Publication; 1998.
Rennie W: The Role of Human Resource Management and the Human Resource Professional in the New Economy. Pretoria, South Africa: University of Pretoria; 2004.
Wilna D: The Development of a Model That Incorporates Ethics in the Recruitment and Selection Process. Pretoria, South Africa: University of Pretoria; 2004.
Polit DF, Beck CT: The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006; 29: 489-497.
Kaiser HF, Rice J: Little jiffy, mark IV. Educ Psychol Meas. 1974; 34: 111-117.
Lobindo-Wood G, Haber J: Nursing Research. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Mosby; 1994.
Waltz CF, Strickland OL, Lenz ER: Measurement in nursing and health research. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2010.
Burns N, Grove SK: The practice of nursing research. Conduct, Critique and Utilization. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Saunders Company; 2005.
Fleiss JL: Design and analysis of clinical experiments. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
Mortelmans LJ, Van Boxstael S, De Cauwer HG, et al.: Preparedness of Belgian civil hospitals for chemical, biological, radiation, and nuclear incidents: Are we there yet? Eur J Emerg Med. 2014; 21: 296-300.
Dallas CE, Klein KR, Lehman T, et al.: Readiness for radiological and nuclear events among emergency medical personnel. Frontiers Public Health. 2017; 5: 202.
Rassin M, Avraham M, Nasi-Bashari A, et al.: Emergency department staff preparedness for mass casualty events involving children. Disaster Manage Response. 2007; 5: 36-44.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright 2007-2023, Weston Medical Publishing, LLC
All Rights Reserved
