Earthquake response in Chile: A case study in health emergency and disaster risk management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5055/ajdm.2021.0413Keywords:
earthquake, disaster, mitigation, preparedness, early warning, response coordinationAbstract
Chile is one of the most seismically active nations in the world. Due to the frequency of earthquakes, the Chilean government has invested heavily in several earthquake mitigation strategies and is able to boast impressively low numbers of deaths after relatively strong earthquakes. These include earthquake-centered building codes, which help prevent collapses, early detection technologies, early warning systems, public awareness campaigns, and unified command of responding agencies. Disaster risk management is a field in need of more evidence-based recommendations, and taking cues from successful programs such as these is vital to decrease global deaths. There is still room for improvement. Individual frontline responders have sought out further training specific to earthquakes, and the frequency of earthquakes in the country has led to impressive institutional knowledge. However, there needs to be more universal, standardized response training. Additionally, although all responders are brought under one umbrella during a disaster, there is a lack of coordinated training, with most responder training occurring in silos. Further investment in preparedness, and a strong focus on mitigation and prevention of disasters is vital across a number of disasters. Fast onset disasters like earthquakes are especially amenable to mitigation strategies such as those in place in Chile.
References
Amadeo K: Haiti earthquake: Facts, damage, effects on the economy. Balanc. 2020. Available at https://www.thebalance.com/haitiearthquake-facts-damage-effects-on-economy-3305660. Accessed January 14, 2021.
Wyss J: Engineers vs. God: Chile’s building codes take edge off massive earthquake. Miami Herald. 2015. Available at https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/world/americas/article35576640.html. Accessed January 14, 2021.
Chile-Disaster Management Reference Handbook. Hawaii: Pearl Harbor, 2017. Available at https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/Chile-2017-draft6-lowres.pdf. Accessed January 14, 2021.
Soules JG, Bachman RE, Silva JF: Chilean standard NCh433. Of96: Seismic design of buildings. In Chile Earthquake of 2010: Assessment of Industrial Facilities around Concepcion. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2016. DOI: 10.1061/9780784413647.ap01.
Hamburger R, Bonelli P, Lagos R, et al.: Comparison of US and Chilean Building Code Requirements and Seismic Design Practice 1985-2010. 2012. Available at https://www.nist.gov/publications/comparison-us-and-chilean-building-code-requirements-and-seismic-design-practice-1985. Accessed January 14, 2021.
Bostwick W: Lessons from Chile: Better building codes work, so why don’t we have them? Fast Co. 2010. Available at https://www.fastcompany.com/90182300/lessons-from-chile-better-building-codeswork-so-why-dont-we-have-them. Accessed January 14, 2021.
UNESCO: Earthquake and tsunami in Chile: Massive evacuation and building codes help to reduce loss of life. ReliefWeb. 2015. Available at https://reliefweb.int/report/chile/earthquake-and-tsunami-chile-massive-evacuation-and-building-codes-help-reduce-loss. Accessed January 27, 2021.
Paton D: Disasters and communities: Vulnerability, resilience and preparedness. An Int J. 2001; 16(3): 210. DOI: 10.1108/09653560710758323.
National Data Buoy Center: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2021. Available at https://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/. Accessed October 25, 2021.
ONEMI: Basic Integral Security Guide for Visitors and Foreign Residents in Chile. Available at https://santiago.diplo.de/blob/1163456/262d5246854341cc7c39425d4c6f0061/pdf-handbuch-onemi-englisch-data.pdf. Accessed January 27, 2021.
USAR Group of Firefighters of Chile achieves classification before the United Nations – Firefighters: Available at https://www.bomberos.cl/contenidos/grupo-usar-de-bomberos-de-chile-logra-clasificacion-ante-naciones-unidas. Accessed March 26, 2021.
Mardones A, Arellano P, Rojas C, et al.: Prevention of crush syndrome through aggressive early resuscitation: Clinical case in a buried worker. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016; 31(3): 340-342. DOI: 10.1017/S1049023X16000327.
Mallon W, Valenzuela R, Salway R, et al.: The specialty of emergency medicine in Chile: 20 years of history. Rev Médica Clínica Las Condes. 2017; 28(2): 163-169. DOI: 10.1016/j.rmclc.2017.04.002.
Bronfman NC, Cisternas PC, Repetto PB, et al.: Natural disaster preparedness in a multi-hazard environment: Characterizing the sociodemographic profile of those better (worse) prepared. PLoS One. 2019; 14(4): e0214249. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214249.
Leonard HB, Cole CM, Howitt AM, et al.: Why Was Boston Strong? Lessons from the Boston Marathon Bombing. Boston, 2014. Available at https://nasemso.org/wp-content/uploads/Lessons_from_the_Boston_Bombing.pdf. Accessed March 23, 2021.
Mcnulty EJ, Director MA, Dorn BC, et al.: Swarm intelligence: Establishing behavioral norms for the emergence of collective leadership. J Leadersh Educ. 2018; 17(2): DOI: 10.12806/V17/I2/R2.
Hung KK, Mashino S, Chan E, et al.: Health workforce development in health emergency and disaster risk management: The need for evidence-based recommendations. IJERPH. 2021; 18(18): 3382.
Shreve CM, Kelman I: Does mitigation save? Reviewing cost-benefit analyses of disaster risk reduction. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2014; 10(A): 213-235. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.08.004.
Mahon SE, Rifino JJ: Role of bystanders in disasters. In Ciottone G (ed.): Ciottone’s Disaster Medicine. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc., 2016: 302-307. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-323-28665-7.00047-9.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright 2007-2023, Weston Medical Publishing, LLC
All Rights Reserved
