Characteristics of chemical attacks




chemical attacks, chlorine gas, mustard gas


Background: The use and storage of chemical weapons in war was banned. However, chemical weapons continue to be used in wars. Therefore, in this study, we tried to identify the chemical agents used by defining the characteristics of chemical attacks.

Method: We designed our study using the international dataset that can be accessed from Chemical attacks between 1970 and 2020 were recorded in terms of decade, type of attack, success, suicidal purpose, property damage, number of deaths and injuries, and agents used.

Results: A total of 347 attacks were reported. The highest number of attacks was 162 (46.7 percent), which occurred between 2010 and 2020. Among the chemical agents used, acidic substances (39, 11.2 percent), chlorine gas (32, 9.2 percent), and tearing agents (24, 6.9 percent) were found to be the most common. When the distribution of the five most common chemical agents by years was examined, it was found that the use of chlorine gas gradually increased in the last three decades. In the last decade, it was found that the use of mustard gas increased, whereas cyanide was not used.

Conclusion: In the last decade, we found that chemical attacks have increased more, especially chlorine and mustard gas were predominantly used.

Author Biographies

Emel Altıntaş, MD

Emergency Medicine Specialist, Department of Emergency Medicine, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Altındag, Ankara, Turkey

Ali Kaan Ataman, MD

Assistant Professor of Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Okan University, Tuzla, Istanbul, Turkey


DeLuca MA, Chai PR, Goralnick E, et al.: Five decades of global chemical terror attacks: Data analysis to inform training and preparedness. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2021; 15(6): 750-761.

Global Terrorism Database: Available at Accessed September 16, 2022.

Zellner T, Eyer F: Choking agents and chlorine gas—History, pathophysiology, clinical effects and treatment. Toxicol Lett. 2020; 320: 73-79.

Achanta S, Jordt SE: Toxic effects of chlorine gas and potential treatments: A literature review. Toxicol Mech Methods. 2021; 31(4): 244-256.

Fuchs A, Giuliano EA, Sinha NR, et al.: Ocular toxicity of mustard gas: A concise review. Toxicol Lett. 2021; 343: 21-27.

Rafati-Rahimzadeh M, Rafati-Rahimzadeh M, Kazemi S, et al.: Ophthalmological aspects of mustard gas poisoning (focus on management). Caspian J Intern Med. 2022; 13(3): 458-468.

Balszuweit F, John H, Schmidt A, et al.: Silibinin as a potential therapeutic for sulfur mustard injuries. Chem Biol Interact. 2013; 206(3): 496-504.



How to Cite

Altıntaş, MD, E., and A. K. Ataman, MD. “Characteristics of Chemical Attacks”. American Journal of Disaster Medicine, vol. 17, no. 3, Sept. 2022, pp. 257-60, doi:10.5055/ajdm.2022.0439.