Human well-being and animal welfare: Is there an ethical link to be implemented from the COVID-19 pandemic into the practice of emergency management?

Authors

  • Asante Msimang, BPharm
  • Shelley Edwards, PhD
  • Sergio Alloggio, PhD
  • Roman Tandlich, PhD

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5055/ajdm.0481

Keywords:

five freedoms, humanitarian ethics, coronavirus disease 2019

Abstract

Through the definition of risk management and its interpretation in multidimensional protection of humans and animals in emergencies and during disasters, in this article, the authors focus on the ethical links between human well-being and animal welfare in emergency and disaster risk management. Coronavirus disease 2019 and its impact on animal welfare are used to consistently demonstrate the link between human well-being and animal welfare. Examples of international legal and ethical norms are provided to demonstrate the need for protecting humans and animals in emergencies and disasters, such as the proposed Universal Declaration of Animal Welfare. The proposed link is ultimately an expression of duty of care required for emergency and disaster risk managers.

Author Biographies

Asante Msimang, BPharm

Disaster Management and Ethics Research Group (DMERG), Faculty of Pharmacy, Rhodes University, Makhanda, South Africa

Shelley Edwards, PhD

Zoology & Entomology Molecular Lab (ZEML), Department of Zoology and Entomology, Rhodes University, Makhanda, South Africa

Sergio Alloggio, PhD

Independent Scholar and External Associate, Disaster Management and Ethics Research Group (DMERG), Makhanda, South Africa

Roman Tandlich, PhD

Disaster Management and Ethics Research Group (DMERG), Faculty of Pharmacy, Rhodes University, Makhanda, South Africa

References

Drabek TE: Theories relevant to emergency management versus a theory of emergency management. J Emerg Manag. 2005; 3(4): 49-54. DOI: 10.5055/jem.2005.0040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.2005.0040

Jensen J: Emergency management theory: Unrecognised, underused and underdeveloped. In Hubbard JA (ed.): Integrating Emergency Management into Higher Education—Ideas, Programs and Strategies. Fairfax, VA: Public Entity Risk Institute, 2010: 7-24. ISBN: 978-0-9793722-4-7.

United States Federal Communications Commission (USFCC): 911 and E911 services. 2021. Available at https://www.fcc.gov/general/9-1-1-and-e9-1-1-services#:~:text=Emergency%20personnel%20and%20others%20often,fire%2C%20and%20law%20enforcement%20agencies. Accessed March 2, 2023.

European Commission (EC): 112: EU emergency number. Available at https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/112. Accessed March 2, 2023.

McEntire DA: Disasters and the theory of emergency management. 2021. DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1539

International Association of Fire Chiefs (IAFC): IAFC position: Code of ethics for chiefs. 1999-2022. Available at https://www.iafc.org/topics-and-tools/resources/resource/iafc-position-code-of-ethicsfor-chiefs#:~:text=Conduct%20our%20personal%20affairs%20in,for%20influence%20or%20official%20action. Accessed December 23, 2022.

Reliefweb: University of Loughborough: Disasters and emergencies: Definitions, impacts and response. 2011-2023. Available at https://reliefweb.int/report/world/disasters-and-emergencies-definitions-impacts-and-response?gclid=CjwKCAiAxvGfBhB-EiwAMPakqqLmW_SyDSjD6vZVrHBcpwmSp6FmTzHQtNQFCgP1ouaT-1V6aLFV3xoCsY0QAvD_BwE. Accessed February 27, 2023.

Verster T, Fourie E: The good, the bad and the ugly of South African fatal road accidents. S Afr J Sci. 2018; 114(7-8): 63-69. DOI: 10.17159/sajs.2018/20170427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2018/20170427

Bourque LB, Siegel JM, Kano M, et al.: Morbidity and mortality associated with disasters. In Handbook of Disaster Research. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. New York, NY: Springer, 2007: pp. 97-112. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-32353-4_6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-32353-4_6

Stellenbosch University: Procedure in case of fire. 2020. Available at https://www.sun.ac.za/english/faculty/science/microbiology/Documents/Procedure%20in%20case%20of%20a%20fire.pdf. Accessed March 3, 2023.

Dalla Villa P, Watson C, Prasarnphanich O, et al.: Integrating animal welfare into disaster management using an ‘all-hazards’ approach. Rev Sci Tech. 2020; 39(2): 599-613. DOI: 10.20506/rst.39.2.3110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.39.2.3110

Knepper HJ, Evans MD, Henley TJ: Chapter 1—Considering intersectionality and its implications for crisis management. In Knepper HJ, Evans MD, Henley TJ (eds.): Intersectionality and Crisis Management A Path to Social Equity. London: Routledge, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003184621-1

Olson RS, Ganapati NE, Gawronski VT, et al.: From disaster risk reduction to policy studies: Bridging research communities. Nat Hazards Rev. 2020; 21(2): 04020014. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000365

South African Bureau of Standards (SANS): SANS 10386:2021 (Edition 2): South African National Standard. Cape Town: SABS, 2021.

World Health Organisation (WHO): Constitution: WHO remains firmly committed to the principles set out in the preamble to the constitution. 2023. Available at https://www.who.int/about/governance/constitution. Accessed August 29, 2023.

United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Well-being concepts. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/hrqol/wellbeing.htm. Accessed August 29, 2023.

Mellor DJ, Beausoleil NJ, Littlewood KE, et al.: The 2020 five domains model: Including human–animal interactions in assessments of animal welfare. Animals. 2020; 10: 1870. DOI: 10.3390/ani10101870. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10101870

Prevention Web: Ethical principles on disaster risk reduction and people’s resilience. 2012. Available at https://www.preventionweb.net/publication/ethical-principles-disaster-risk-reductionand-peoples-resilience#:~:text=The%20ethical%20principles%20applied%20during,vii)%20The%20importance%20of%20rescue. Accessed February 12, 2023.

Broussard G, Rubenstein LS, Robinson C, et al.: Challenges to ethical obligations and humanitarian principles in conflict settings: A systematic review. Int J Humanit Action. 2019; 4: 15. DOI: 10.1186/s41018-019-0063-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-019-0063-x

International Standardisation Organisation (ISO): ISO 31000:2018(en) risk management—Guidelines. 2018-present. Available at https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:31000:ed-2:v1:en. Accessed February 12, 2023.

Sawalha IH: A contemporary perspective on the disaster management cycle. Foresight. 2020; 22(4): 469-482. DOI: 10.1108/FS-11-2019-0097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-11-2019-0097

Hoossein S, Tandlich R, Whittington-Jones K, et al.: Disaster management policy options to address the sanitation challenges in South Africa. J Environ Health. 2016; 78(7): E1-E7.

Ngqwala NP, Srinivas CS, Tandlich R, et al.: Participatory multi-stakeholder platforms for effective disaster management in South Africa. J Disaster Res. 2017; 12(6): 1192-1202. DOI: 10.20965/jdr.2017.p1192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2017.p1192

Van Niekerk D, Coetzee C, Nemakonde L: Implementing the Sendai framework in Africa: Progress against the targets (2015–2018). Int J Disaster Risk Sci. 2020; 11: 179-189. DOI: 10.1007/s13753-020-00266-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-020-00266-x

Zhou L, Kori DS, Sibanda M, et al.: An analysis of the differences in vulnerability to climate change: A review of rural and urban areas in South Africa. Climate. 2022; 10(8): 118. DOI: 10.3390/cli10080118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cli10080118

Katich K: Monitoring and evaluation in disaster risk management. EAP DRM Knowledge Notes, No. 21. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2010. Available at https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/bf0e7655-9962-5258-83bd-305a4ce3fb84. Accessed March 3, 2023.

Prevention Web: Available at https://www.preventionweb.net/sendai-framework/sendai-framework-indicators. Accessed February 12, 2023.

Cverenkárová K, Valachovicˇová M, Mackul’ak T, et al.: Microplastics in the food chain. Life (Basel). 2021; 11(12): 1349. DOI: 10.3390/life11121349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/life11121349

Ambang OA, Alloggio S, Tandlich R: Dissecting the post-humanist ethical framework in environmental resource management, bioprospecting and the related legislation. Environ Law Manag. 2019; 31(3): 96-116.

Irvine P, Ridgwell A: Geoengineering-taking control of our planet’s climate. Sci Prog. 2009; 92(2): 139-162. DOI: 10.3184/003685009X461495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3184/003685009X461495

Bhuyan S: Effects of microplastics on fish and in human health. Front Environ Sci. 2022; 10. DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.827289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.827289

Iheanetu CU, Maguire KA, Moricová V, et al.: Utilitarian qubit, human geography, and pandemic preparedness in the 21st century. Sustainability. 2022; 15(1): 321. DOI: 10.3390/su15010321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010321

Martini M, Gazzaniga V, Bragazzi NL, et al.: The Spanish Influenza Pandemic: A lesson from history 100 years after 1918. J Prev Med Hyg. 2019; 60(1): E64-E67. DOI: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2019.60.1.1205.

Bendito A, Barrios E: Convergent agency: Encouraging transdisciplinary approaches for effective climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction. Int J Disaster Risk Sci. 2016; 7: 430-435. DOI: 10.1007/s13753-016-0102-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-016-0102-9

United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): What is One Health? Available at https://www.cdc.gov/onehealth/basics/index.html. Accessed February 12, 2023.

Shi C, Zhang Y, Li C, et al.: Using the Delphi method to identify risk factors contributing to adverse events in residential aged care facilities. Risk Manag Healthcare Policy. 2020; 13: 523-537. DOI: 10.2147/RMHP.S243929. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S243929

Worobey M, Levy JI, Malpica Serrano L, et al.: The Huanan seafood wholesale market in Wuhan was the early epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic. Science. 2022; 377(6609): 951-959. DOI: 10.1126/science.abp8715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abp8715

Mofijur M, Fattah IMR, Alam MA, et al.: Impact of COVID-19 on the social, economic, environmental and energy domains: Lessons learnt from a global pandemic. Sustain Prod Consum. 2021; 26: 343-359. DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.016

World Meteorological Organisation (WMO): Eight warmest years on record witness upsurge in climate change impacts. 2022. Available at https://wmo.int/news/media-centre/eight-warmest-years-recordwitness-upsurge-climate-change-impacts#:~:text=2015%20to%202022%20are%20likely,significant%20La%20Ni%C3%B1a%20in%202011. Accessed December 23, 2022.

World Economic Forum (WEF): 6 charts that show the state of biodiversity and nature loss—and how we can go ‘nature positive. 2022. Available at https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/10/natureloss-biodiversity-wwf/. Accessed December 23, 2022.

United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction/Center for Research in the Epidemiology of Disasters (UNDRR/CRED): Human cost of disasters: An overview of the last 20 years 2000-2019. 2000-2019. Available at https://www.undrr.org/media/48008/download. Accessed December 23, 2022.

Center for Disaster Philanthropy (CDF): 2019-2020 Australian bushfires. 2022. Available at https://disasterphilanthropy.org/disasters/2019-australian-wildfires/. Accessed December 23, 2022.

World Wildlife Fund Australia (WWF-AU): New WWF report: 3 billion animals impacted by Australia’s bushfire crisis (interim report). 2020. Available at https://www.wwf.org.au/news/news/2020/3-billion-animals-impacted-by-australia-bushfire-crisis. Accessed December 23, 2022.

Godfree RC, Knerr N, Encinas-Viso F, et al.: Implications of the 2019–2020 megafires for the biogeography and conservation of Australian vegetation. Nat Commun. 2021; 12: 1023. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21266-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21266-5

Pausas JG, Keeley JE: Wildfires as an ecosystem service. Front Ecol Environ. 2019; 17(5): 289-295. DOI: 10.1002/fee.2044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2044

Roces-Díaz JV, Santín C, Martínez-Vilalta J, et al.: A global synthesis of fire effects on ecosystem services of forests and woodlands. Front Ecol Environ. 2021; 20(3): 170-178. DOI: 10.1002/fee.2349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2349

Rasul G, Nepal AK, Hussain A, et al.: Socio-economic implications of COVID-19 pandemic in South Asia: Emerging risks and growing challenges. Front Sociol. 2021; 6: 629693. DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.629693. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2021.629693

Lopez-Leon S, Wegman-Ostrosky T, Perelman C, et al.: More than 50 long-term effects of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2021; 11: 16144. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-95565-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95565-8

Mbunge E: Effects of COVID-19 in South African health system and society: An explanatory study. Diabetol Metabol Syndr. 2020; 14(6): 1809-1814. DOI: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.09.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.09.016

Vilcek S: SARS-CoV-2: Zoonotic origin of pandemic coronavirus. Acta Virol. 2020; 64(3): 281-287. DOI: 10.4149/av_2020_302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4149/av_2020_302

Zimmer C, Gorman J: A group of scientists presses a case against the lab leak theory of COVID. 2021. Available at https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/09/science/coronavirus-origins-lab-leak.html. Accessed December 19, 2022.

Nga NTT, Latinne A, Thuy HB, et al.: Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 related coronaviruses circulating in Sunda pangolins (Manis javanica) confiscated from the illegal wildlife trade in Viet Nam. Front Public Health. 2022; 10: 826116. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.826116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.826116

Savepangolins: Wildlife conservation society: “has Vietnam banned the wildlife trade to curb the risk of future pandemics? 2020. Available at https://newsroom.wcs.org/News-Releases/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/14625/Has-Vietnam-banned-the-wildlifetrade-to-curb-the-risk-of-future-pandemics.aspx#:~:text=On%20July%2023rd%202020,to%20the%20COVID%2D19%20pandemic. Accessed December 19, 2022.

Wildlife Justice Commission: Rapid assessment of the impact of COVID-19 on wildlife trafficking. 2020. Available at https://wildlifejustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/WJC_Impact-of-COVID19-on-wildlife-trafficking_April2020.pdf. Accessed December 19, 2022.

Esposito MM, Turku S, Lehrfield L, et al.: The Impact of Human Activities on Zoonotic Infection Transmissions. Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(10): 1646. DOI: 10.3390/ani13101646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13101646

Lorentzen HF, Benfield T, Stisen S, et al.: Correspondence: COVID-19 is possibly a consequence of the anthropogenic biodiversity crisis and climate changes. Danish Med J. 2020; 7(5): A205025.

Poaching Facts: Rhino poaching statistics. 2022. Available at https://www.poachingfacts.com/poaching-statistics/rhino-poachingstatistics/. Accessed December 19, 2022.

Morrissey K: Vermont journal of environmental law: Ecoperspectives blog. 2019-2022. Available at https://vjel.vermontlaw.edu/ecoperspectivesblog/2020/07/extending-emergency-preparedness-to-farm-animals/. Accessed December 23, 2022.

EUR-Lex: EU rules on the protection of animals during transport 2005-2022. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/eu-rules-on-the-protection-of-animalsduring-transport.html#:~:text=No%20person%20shall%20transport%20animals,must%20be%20fit%20for%20transport. Accessed December 23, 2022.

Societies for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act No. 169 of 1993 (NSPCA Act): 1993. Available at https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/act169of1993.pdf. Accessed February 12, 2023.

South African Animal Health Act No. 7 of 2002 (SAG): 2002-present. Available at https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/a7-02.pdf. Accessed February 12, 2023.

Muluneh MG: Impact of climate change on biodiversity and food security: A global perspective—A review article. Agric Food Secur. 2021; 10: 36. DOI: 10.1186/s40066-021-00318-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-021-00318-5

Iheanetu C, Tandlich R: Between science, science-fiction and COVID19 as a way to interpret the ontological realm of COVID19. Humanity in the post-COVID19 and re-application of knowledge. Acad Int Sci J. 2022; 13(26): 27-46. DOI: 10.7336/academicus.2022.26.02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7336/academicus.2022.26.02

United States Congress (US Congress): Pets evacuation and transportation standards act of 2006. 2005-2006. Available at https://www.congress.gov/109/plaws/publ308/PLAW-109publ308.pdf. Accessed February 12, 2023.

Sphere Standards (LEGS): Livestock emergency guidelines and standards (LEGS). 2014. Available at https://handbook.spherestandards.org/en/legs/#ch001. Accessed February 12, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3362/9781780448268

World Animal Protection: Universal declaration of animal welfare. Disaster Management and Animal Welfare. Available at https://www.worldanimalprotection.ca/sites/default/files/media/ca_-_en_files/case_for_a_udaw_tcm22-8305.pdf. Accessed February 13, 2023.

World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH): Terrestrial code online access: Glossary. 2023. Available at https://www.woah.org/fileadmin/Home/eng/Health_standards/tahc/2018/en_glossaire.htm. Accessed February 13, 2023.

Godfroid J: Brucellosis in livestock and wildlife: Zoonotic diseases without pandemic potential in need of innovative one health approaches. Arch Public Health. 2017; 75: 34. DOI: 10.1186/s13690-017-0207-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-017-0207-7

Vhiriri EP, Irwin Y, Laubscher R, et al.: Legislation and policy analysis on management of listeriosis epidemic disaster in South Africa. Am J Disaster Med. 2020; 15(2): 113-128. DOI: 10.5055/ajdm.2020.0361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5055/ajdm.2020.0361

Lacetera N: Impact of climate change on animal health and welfare. Anim Front. 2019; 9(1): 26-31. DOI: 10.1093/af/vfy030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/af/vfy030

Burraco P, Orizaola G: Ionizing radiation and melanism in Chornobyl tree frogs. Evol Appl. 2022; 15(9): 1469-1479. DOI: 10.1111/eva.13476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.13476

Council of Europe (COE): Ethical principles on disaster risk reduction and people’s resilience. 2012. Available at https://www.coe.int/t/dg4/majorhazards/ressources/pub/Ethical-Principles-Publication_EN.pdf. Accessed February 13, 2023.

United Nations (UN): Universal declaration of human rights. 1948-2023. Available at https://www.ohchr.org/en/human-rights/universal-declaration/translations/english. Accessed December 26, 2022.

Animal Humane Society: The five freedoms for animals. 2023. Available at https://www.animalhumanesociety.org/health/five-freedoms-animals. Accessed February 13, 2023.

World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH): Terrestrial code online access: Chapter 2.1: Risk analysis. 2023. Available at https://www.woah.org/en/what-we-do/standards/codes-and-manuals/terrestrial-code-online-access/?id=169&L=1&htmfile=chapitre_import_risk_analysis.htm. Accessed February 13, 2023.

Kraaij T, Baard JA, Arndt J, et al.: An assessment of climate, weather, and fuel factors influencing a large, destructive wildfire in the Knysna Region, South Africa. Fire Ecol. 2018; 14: 4. DOI: 10.1186/s42408-018-0001-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-018-0001-0

Rains M: Still in shock. Amid wildfire tragedy, Maui scientists assess their research losses. 2023. Available at https://www.science.org/content/article/still-in-shock-amid-wildfire-tragedy-maui-scientists-assess-their-research-losses. Accessed August 29, 2023.

Published

09/01/2024

How to Cite

Msimang, A., S. Edwards, S. Alloggio, and R. Tandlich. “Human Well-Being and Animal Welfare: Is There an Ethical Link to Be Implemented from the COVID-19 Pandemic into the Practice of Emergency Management?”. American Journal of Disaster Medicine, vol. 19, no. 3, Sept. 2024, pp. 237-50, doi:10.5055/ajdm.0481.

Issue

Section

Articles