Perceived benefits of animal-assisted therapy in the oncology waiting room

Authors

  • Linda L. Buettner, PhD, LRT, CTRS
  • YingChen Wang, PhD
  • Kaitlin Stevens
  • Hannah Jessup
  • Gustav C. Magrinat, MD

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5055/ajrt.2011.0025

Keywords:

animal-assisted therapy, cancer, benefits

Abstract

This study identified perceived benefits of animal-assisted therapy (AAT) on anxiety, pain, communication, and cognition among patients waiting for treatment in a large urban cancer center. A convenience sample of 75 patients and five family members (n = 80) waiting for treatment completed a survey about AAT. After giving informed consent, participants were asked to complete questions related to attitudes about offering a complementary therapy dog program in the hospital. Findings indicated that most respondents were very accepting of AAT in the cancer center, with 78 percent indicating that they would like to take part in this complementary therapy. The perceived benefits of AAT included that it would provide a method for positive communication (93 percent), cognitive stimulation (92.3 percent), it would help to pass time more quickly (88.8 percent), it would help people to feel more comfortable at the cancer center (84.8 percent), and it would reduce participants’ pain (71.3 percent) and anxiety (68.4 percent). The association between gender and anxiety produced a statistically meaningful result in this study about predicting subjects’ participation in the program. Ultimately, offering recreational therapy facilitated AAT in cancer center waiting areas may provide benefits for patients and provide a competitive edge to hospitals.

Author Biographies

Linda L. Buettner, PhD, LRT, CTRS

Professor, Department of Community and Therapeutic Recreation, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina.

YingChen Wang, PhD

Institutional Research, University of New Mexico at Carlsbad, Carlsbad, New Mexico.

Kaitlin Stevens

Therapeutic Recreation Student, Department of Community and Therapeutic Recreation, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina.

Hannah Jessup

Therapeutic Recreation Student, Department of Community and Therapeutic Recreation, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina.

Gustav C. Magrinat, MD

Cone Health Cancer Center, Greensboro, North Carolina.

References

American Cancer Society Facts and Figures 2011. Available at http://www.cancer.org/Research/CancerFactsFigures. Accessed November 5, 2011.

Jordan M, Delunas L: Quality of life and patterns of nontraditional therapy use by patients with cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2001; 28: 1107-1113.

National Cancer Institute: Available at http://www.cancer.gov/. Accessed November 5, 2011.

National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Available at http://nccam.nih.gov/. Accessed October 30, 2011.

American Hospital Association: News Release: Latest Survey Shows More Hospitals Offering Complementary and Alternative Medicine Services. 2008. Available at http://www.aha.org/presscenter/pressrel/2008/080915-prcam.shtml. Accessed October 20, 2011.

Horowitz S: Animal-assisted therapy for inpatients: Tapping the unique healing power of the human-animal bond. Altern Complement Ther. 2010; 16(6): 339-343.

Munoz Lasa S, Ferriero G, Brigatti E, et al.: Animalassisted interventions in internal and rehabilitation medicine: A review of the recent literature. Panminerva Med. 2011; 53(2): 129-136.

Orlandi M, Trangeled K, Mambrini A, et al.: Pet therapy effects on oncological day hospital patients undergoing chemotherapy treatment. Anticancer Res. 2007; 27: 4301-4304.

Bouchard F, Landry M, Belles-Isles M, et al.: Implementing a hospital-based animal therapy program for children with cancer; a descriptive study. Can Oncol Nurs J. 2004; 14(4): 217-222.

Bouchard F, Landry M, Belles-Isles M, et al.: A magical dream: A pilot project in animal assisted therapy in pediatric oncology. Can Oncol Nurs J. 2004; 14(1): 14-17.

Johnson R, Meadows R, Haubner J, et al.: Human-animal interaction: A complementary/alternative medical intervention for cancer patients. Am Behav Sci. 2003; 47(1): 55-69.

Ursin H, Eriksen HR: The cognitive activation theory of stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2004; 29(5): 567-592.

Selye H: Stress Without Distress. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Co, 1974.

Stokes M, Davis C, Koch G: Categorical Data Analysis Using the SAS System. Cary, NC: SAS Publishing, 2009.

Published

10/01/2011

How to Cite

Buettner, PhD, LRT, CTRS, L. L., Wang, PhD, Y., Stevens, K., Jessup, H., & Magrinat, MD, G. C. (2011). Perceived benefits of animal-assisted therapy in the oncology waiting room. American Journal of Recreation Therapy, 10(4), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.5055/ajrt.2011.0025

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)