Exploring the leisure meaning for staff and residents in community-based residential programs serving individuals with substance use disorders (SUDs)
Keywords:leisure meaning, substance use disorders, recovery, treatment, residential programs
Objective: This study sought to compare leisure meaning among staff and residents at community residences for individuals in early recovery from substance use disorders (SUDs).
Design: This study employed a cross sectional survey design using the Leisure Meaning Inventory (LMI) to compare resident and staff leisure meaning.
Setting: Study participants were either working at or living in community residences serving individuals in recovery from SUDs.
Patients and participants: Criterion-based purposeful sampling was used to recruit participants from community residences in Central New York State.
Main outcome measure(s): This study assessed resident and staff’s perceptions of leisure using the LMI.
Results: Following Mann–Whitney U test, residents scored significantly higher in the leisure as a means of passing time (U (N staff = 23, N resident = 31) = 635.000, z = 4.876, p < .05) subscale. Staff scored significantly higher in the leisure as a means of escaping pressure (U (N staff = 23, N resident = 31) = 100.000, z = –4.499, p < .05), subscale and the “I think leisure is an important part of life” (U (N staff = 23, N resident = 31) = 249.000, z = –2.355, p < .05) independent item.
Conclusions: Findings suggest that the attitudinal differences between the two groups may reflect the starkly different amounts of time that each group has available for leisure. As such, recommendations are made for additional leisure-focused services and supports for residents and staff to enhance leisure programing and leisure-related recovery capital at this level of care.
Jones CM, Noonan RK, Compton WM: Prevalence and correlates of ever having a substance use problem and substance use recovery status among adults in the United States, 2018. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020; 214(April): 108169. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108169.
Nugent C: SAMHSA’s Working Definition of Recovery. 2012: 8. Available at https://store.samhsa.gov/shin/content/PEP12-RECDEF/PEP12-RECDEF.pdf. Accessed October 7, 2018.
SAMHSA: Treatments for Substance Use Disorders. Behavioral Health Treatments and Services. 2018. Available at https://www.samhsa.gov/treatment/substanceuse-disorders. Accessed August 19, 2018.
SAMHSA: SAMHSA’s working definition of recovery updated | SAMHSA Blog. Engagement services, featured, headline, public awareness and support, recovery support. 2012. Available at https://blog.samhsa.gov/2012/03/23/defintion-of-recovery-updated/#.WzfGcdJKiUl. Accessed June 30, 2018.
Page J, Townsend J: The role of recreation and recreational therapists in developing a recovery-oriented identity for people with substance use disorders. Alcohol Treat Q. 2017. DOI: 10.1080/07347324.2017.1407225.
NYS OASAS: Part 820 Residential Services. 2015: 1-21.
Office of The New York State Comptroller. Office of Addiction Services and Supports: Oversight of Chemical Dependence Residential Services. Albany, NY; 2021. Available at https://www.osc.state.ny.us/files/state-agencies/audits/pdf/sga-2022-20s49.pdf. Accessed March 17, 2022.
NIDA: NIDA research report series 1: Therapeutic communities. 2015. Available at https://d14rmgtrwzf5a.cloudfront.net/sites/default/files/therapueticcomm_rrs_0723.pdf. Accessed October 27, 2017.
Page J, Hawkins B, Townsend J, et al.: Leisure constraints experienced by people in early recovery from substance use disorders. J Subst Use. 2022; 1-5. DOI: 10.1080/14659891.2022.2043472.
Mooney AJ, Dold C, Eisenberg H: The Recovery Book. New York, NY: Workman Publishing Company, 2014.
Cloud W, Granfield R: Conceptualizing recovery capital: Expansion of a theoretical construct. Subst Use Misuse. 2008; 43(12-13): 1971-1986. DOI: 10.1080/10826080802289762.
Hennessy EA: Recovery capital: A systematic review of the literature. Addict Res Theory. 2017; 25(5): 349-360. DOI: 10.1080/16066359.2017.1297990.
Decker KP, Peglow SL, Samples CR: Participation in a novel treatment component during residential substance use treatment is associated with improved outcome: A pilot study. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2014; 9(7): 1-10. DOI: 10.1186/1940-0640-9-7.
Dingle GA, Stark C, Cruwys T, et al.: Breaking good: Breaking ties with social groups may be good for recovery from substance misuse. Br J Soc Psychol. 2015; 54(2): 236-254. DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12081.
Hodgson S, Lloyd C, Schmid T: The leisure participation of clients with a dual diagnosis. Br J Occup Ther. 2001; 64(10). DOI: 10.1177/030802260106401003.
Perlick DA, Rosenheck RA, Clarkin JF, et al.: Adverse effects of perceived stigma on social adaptation of persons diagnosed with bipolar affective disorder. Psychiatr Serv. 2001; 52(12): 1627-1632. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.12.1627.
Santini ZI, Meilstrup C, Hinrichsen C, et al.: Associations between multiple leisure activities, mental health and substance use among adolescents in Denmark: A nationwide cross-sectional study. Front Behav Neurosci. 2020; 14(December): 1-10. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2020.593340.
Iso-Ahola SE, Weissinger E: Leisure and boredom. J Soc Clin Psychol. 1987; 5(3): 356-364. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Seppo_Iso-ahola/publication/269600524_Leisure_and_Boredom/links/55df476f08ae6abe6e864fa7.pdf. Accessed October 8, 2017.
Hendricks G, Savahl S, Florence M: Adolescent peer pressure, leisure boredom, and substance use in low-income Cape Town communities. Soc Behav Pers. 2015; 43(1): 99-110. DOI: 10.2224/sbp.2015.43.1.99.
Weybright EH, Caldwell LL, Ram N, et al.: Boredom prone or nothing to do? Distinguishing between state and trait leisure boredom and its association with substance use in South African adolescents. Leis Sci. 2015; 37(4): 311-331. DOI: 10.1080/01490400.2015.1014530.
Brener L, Von Hippel W, Von Hippel C: Exploring the relationship between implicit self-representation and drug use. Addict Res Theory. 2012; 20(2): 133-137. DOI: 10.3109/16066359.2011.580067.
Day E, Gaston RL, Furlong E, et al.: United Kingdom substance misuse treatment workers’ attitudes toward 12-step self-help groups. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2005; 29(4): 321-327. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2005.08.009.
Novotná G, Dobbins M, Jack SM, et al.: The influence of lived experience with addiction and recovery on practice-related decisions among professionals working in addiction agencies serving women. Drugs Educ Prev Policy. 2013; 20(2): 140-148. DOI: 10.3109/09687637.2012.714015.
Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL: Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 2018.
Schulz J, Watkins M: The development of the leisure meanings inventory. J Leis Res. 2007; 39(3): 477-497. DOI: 10.1080/00222216.2007.11950118.
Rochon J, Gondan M, Kieser M: To test or not to test: Preliminary assessment of normality when comparing two independent samples. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012; 12. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-81.
Lin T, Chen T, Liu J, et al.: Extending the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon rank sum test to survey data for comparing mean ranks. Stat Med. 2021; 40(7): 1705-1717. DOI: 10.1002/sim.8865.
Lee C-J, Wu C-S, Lin C-T, et al.: Leisure activity and coping with stress: Adolescents as case study. Qual Quant. 2012; 46: 979-991. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-012-9692-5.
Harmon J: Leisure participation, substance abuse disorders, and recovery. Ann Leis Res. 2018; 21(4): 507-521. DOI: 10.1080/11745398.2017.1326157.
Liang-Chih C: Reexamining the relationship between leisure and stress among older adults. J Leis Res. 2015; 47(3): 358-372. Available at http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/016073838890182X. Accessed March 13, 2021.
McKay JR: Making the hard work of recovery more attractive for those with substance use disorders. Addiction. 2017; 112(5): 751-757. DOI: 10.1111/add.13502.
Iwasaki Y, Messina E, Shank J, et al.: Role of leisure in meaning-making for community-dwelling adults with mental illness: Inspiration for engaged life. J Leis Res. 2015; 47(5): 538-555. DOI: 10.18666/jlr-2015-v47-i5-5305.
Iwasaki Y, Coyle C, Shank J, et al.: Role of leisure in recovery from mental illness. Am J Psychiatr Rehabil. 2014; 17(2): 147-165. DOI: 10.1080/15487768.2014.909683.
Iarussi MM: The experiences of college students in recovery from substance use disorders. J Addict Offender Couns. 2018; 39(1): 46-62. DOI: 10.1002/jaoc.12040.
Landale S, Roderick M: Recovery from addiction and the potential role of sport: Using a life-course theory to study change. Int Rev Sociol Sport. 2014; 49: 468-484. DOI: 10.1177/1012690213507273.
Cherner RA, Aubry T, Sylvestre J, et al.: Housing first for adults with problematic substance use. J Dual Diagn. 2017; 13(3): 219-229. DOI: 10.1080/15504263.2017.1319586.
Biolcati R, Mancini G, Trombini E: Proneness to boredom and risk behaviors during adolescents’ free time. Psychol Rep. 2018; 121(2): 303-323. DOI: 10.1177/0033294117724447.
Best D, Albertson K, Lightowlers C, et al.: UK Life in Recovery Survey 2015: The First National UK Survey of Addiction Recovery Experiences. Sheffield, UK, 2015. Available at http://shura.shu.ac.uk/12200/1/FINAL UK Life in Recovery Survey 2015 report.pdf. Accessed April 8, 2021.
American Therapeutic Recreation Association: The organization. Welcome to ATRA. 2016. Available at https://www.atra-online.com/welcome/the-organization. Accessed March 31, 2018.
Hawk M, Coulter RWS, Egan JE, et al.: Harm reduction principles for healthcare settings. Harm Reduct J. 2017; 14(1): 70. DOI: 10.1186/s12954-017-0196-4.
Mental Health America: Ranking the states. 2021. Available at https://www.mhanational.org/issues/rankingstates#overall-ranking. Accessed July 7, 2021.
Demetriou C, Ozer BU, Essau CA: Self-report questionnaires. Encycl Clin Psychol. 2015: 1-6. DOI: 10.1002/9781118625392.wbecp507.
How to Cite
Copyright 2000-2023, Weston Medical Publishing, LLC
All Rights Reserved