The effects of a cognitive training program on individuals with moderate to severe cognitive impairment: A program evaluation study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5055/ajrt.0292

Keywords:

cognitive training, moderate cognitive impairment, severe cognitive impairment, program evaluation, feasibility

Abstract

Objective: This exploratory program evaluation investigated the effectiveness and feasibility of a cognitive training program for individuals aged 75-98 with moderate to severe cognitive impairment.

Design: A pre-/post-quasi-experimental design was implemented.

Setting: Participants were assessed before and after engagement in a cognitive training program implemented by trained activity staff at four older adult care facilities across the United States. Qualitative data on program feasibility were collected post-intervention from staff.

Participants: Assent was gained for 15 participants with confirmed moderate to severe cognitive impairment.

Interventions: All participants completed a 12-week program led by trained facilitators that consisted of activities targeting six cognitive domains, eg, attention and memory.

Main outcome measure: The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status—Update was administered 1 week prior to and 1 week following the completion of the program. A qualitative questionnaire was completed at follow-up by program facilitators to measure program feasibility.

Results: Small to large effect sizes were observed in over half of the cognitive domains assessed. Qualitative data suggest program feasibility.

Conclusions: The results indicate the effectiveness and feasibility of this cognitive training program yet warrant further investigation into the benefits of the program through a randomized controlled trial.

Author Biographies

Jacklyn A. Gehling, MA

School of Graduate Psychology, Pacific University Oregon, Hillsboro, Oregon

Abigail J. Laine, MA

Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, St. Louis, Missouri

Paige T. Tanhoff, MA

Department of Psychology, Minnesota State University, Mankato, Minnesota

Jeffrey A. Buchanan, PhD

Professor, Department of Psychology, Minnesota State University, Mankato, Minnesota

References

Cooper C, Mukadam N, Katona C, et al.: Systematic review of the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions to improve the quality of life of people with dementia. Int Psychogeriatr. 2012; 24(6): 856-870. DOI: 10.1017/S1041610211002614.

Moyle W, Mcallister M, Venturato L, et al.: Quality of life and dementia: The voice of the person with dementia. Dementia. 2007; 6(2): 175-191. DOI: 10.1177/1471301207080362.

Whitehouse PJ, Rabins PV: Quality of life and dementia. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1992; 6(3): 135-137. DOI: 10.1097/00002093-199206030-00001.

Smit D, de Lange J, Willemse B, et al.: Activity involvement and quality of life of people at different stages of dementia in long-term care facilities. Aging Ment Health. 2016; 20(1): 100-109. DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2015.1049116.

Cohen-Mansfield J, Dakheel-Ali M, Jensen B, et al.: An analysis of the relationships among engagement, agitated behavior, and affect in nursing home residents with dementia. Int Psychogeriatr. 2012; 24(5): 742-752. DOI: 10.1017/S1041610211002535.

Ghisletta P, Bickel JF, Lovden M: Does activity engagement protect against cognitive decline in old age? Methodological and analytical considerations. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2006; 61(5): P253-P261. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/61.5.p253.

Chung J: Activity participation and well-being of people with dementia in long-term-care settings. Occup Ther J Res. 2004; 24(1): 22-31. DOI: 10.1177/153944920402400104.

Kallio EL, Ohman H, Kautiainen H, et al.: Cognitive training interventions for patients with Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017; 56(4): 1349-1372. DOI: 10.3233/JAD-160810.

Bahar-Fuchs A, Clare L, Woods B: Cognitive training and cognitive rehabilitation for mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 6(CD003260). DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003260.pub2.

Oyebode JR, Parveen S: Psychosocial interventions for people with dementia: An overview and commentary on recent developments. Dementia. 2019; 18(1): 8-35. DOI: 10.1177/1471301216656096.

Garrido-Pedrosa J, Sala I, Obradors N: Effectiveness of cognition-focused interventions in activities of daily living performance in people with dementia: A systematic review. Br J Occup Ther. 2017; 80(7): 397-408. DOI: 10.1177/0308022617698166.

Hopper T, Bourgeois M, Pimentel J, et al.: An evidence-based systematic review on cognitive interventions for individuals with dementia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013; 22(1): 126-145. DOI: 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0137).

Olazarán J, Reisberg B, Clare L, et al.: Nonpharmacological therapies in Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review of efficacy. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2010; 30(2): 161-178. DOI: 10.1159/000316119.

Mate-Kole C, Fellows RP, Said PC, et al.: Use of computer-assisted and interactive cognitive training programs with moderate to severely demented individuals: A preliminary study. Aging Ment Health. 2007; 11(5): 485-495. DOI: 10.1080/13607860701368422.

Buchanan JA, Johnson E, Kennedy J, et al.: The effects of a cognitive training program for cognitively impaired older adults: A pilot randomized control trial. Int J Aging Res. 2019; 2(2): 30. DOI: 10.28933/IJOAR.

Woods B, Thorgrimsen L, Spector A, et al.: Improved quality of life and cognitive stimulation therapy in dementia. Aging Ment Health. 2006; 10(3): 219-226. DOI: 10.1080/13607860500431652.

Teng EL, Chui HC: The modified mini-mental state (3MS) examination. J Clin Psychiatry. 1987; 48(8): 314-318.

New England Cognitive Center: Active MindTM. 2nd ed., text rev. New London, CT: New England Cognitive Center, Inc., 2015. Available at https://www.cognitivecenter.org/active-mind. Accessed July 26, 2024.

Randolph C: Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Update. New York, NY: Psychological Corp, 2012.

Holden HM, Milano NJ, Horner MD: Five-factor structure of the RBANS is supported in an Alzheimer’s disease sample: Implications for validation of neuropsychological assessment instruments. Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2018; 27: 232-242. DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2018.1529671.

Nguyen L, Murphy K, Andrews G: A game a day keeps cognitive decline away? A systematic review and meta-analysis of commercially available brain training programs in healthy and cognitively impaired older adults. Neuropsychol Rev. 2022; 32(3): 601-630. DOI: 10.1007/s11065-021-09515-2.

McDermott O, Charlesworth G, Hogervorst E, et al.: Psychosocial interventions for people with dementia: A synthesis of systematic reviews. Aging Ment Health. 2019; 23(4): 393-403. DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2017.1423031.

Woods B, Aguirre E, Spector AE, et al.: Cognitive stimulation to improve cognitive functioning in people with dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 2: CD005562. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005562.pub2.

Allen J: Nursing Home Federal Requirements: Guidelines to Surveyors and Survey Protocols. 7th ed. New York: Springer, 2011.

Published

09/01/2024

How to Cite

Gehling, J. A., Laine, A. J., Tanhoff, P. T., & Buchanan, J. A. (2024). The effects of a cognitive training program on individuals with moderate to severe cognitive impairment: A program evaluation study. American Journal of Recreation Therapy, 23(2), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.5055/ajrt.0292

Issue

Section

Articles