Participatory public health systems research: Value of community involvement in a study series in mental health emergency preparedness
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5055/ajdm.2012.0103Keywords:
public health systems research, participatory research, disaster mental health, psychological first aid training, guided preparedness planningAbstract
Background: Concerns have arisen over recent years about the absence of empirically derived evidence on which to base policy and practice in the public health system, in general, and to meet the challenge of public health emergency preparedness, in particular. Related issues include the challenge of disaster-caused, behavioral health surge, and the frequent exclusion of populations from studies that the research is meant to aid.
Objective: To characterize the contributions of nonacademic collaborators to a series of projects validating a set of interventions to enhance capacity and competency of public mental health preparedness planning and response.
Methods: Setting(s): Urban, suburban, and rural communities of the state of Maryland and rural communities of the state of Iowa. Participants: Study partners and participants (both of this project and the studies examined) were representatives of academic health centers (AHCs), local health departments (LHDs), and faith-based organizations (FBOs) and their communities. Procedures: A multiple-project, case study analysis was conducted, that is, four research projects implemented by the authors from 2005 through 2011 to determine the types and impact of contributions made by nonacademic collaborators to those projects. The analysis involved reviewing research records, conceptualizing contributions (and providing examples) for government, faith, and (nonacademic) institutional collaborators.
Results: Ten areas were identified where partners made valuable contributions to the study series; these “value-areas” were as follows: 1) leadership and management of the projects; 2) formulation and refinement of research topics, aims, etc; 3) recruitment and retention of participants; 4) design and enhancement of interventions; 5) delivery of interventions; 6) collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; 7) dissemination of findings; 8) ensuring sustainability of faith/government preparedness planning relationships; 9) optimizing scalability and portability of the model; and 10) facilitating translational impact of study findings.
Conclusions: Systems-based partnerships among academic, faith, and government entities offer an especially promising infrastructure for conducting participatory public health systems research in domestic emergency preparedness and response.
References
Pandemic and All Hazards Preparedness Act (PAHPA), Public Law 109-417 (December 19, 2006).
CDC: Preparedness and Emergency Response Research Centers: A Public Health Systems Approach (PO1); RFA-TP-08-001.
Institute of Medicine: Research Priorities in Emergency Preparedness and Response for Public Health Systems: A Letter Report.Washington, DC: National Academies, 2008.
Acosta J, Nelson C, Beckjord EB, et al.: A National Agenda for Public Health Systems Research on Emergency Preparedness. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2009.
Steinwachs DM: Health services research: Its scope and significance. In Forman P (ed.): Promoting Health Services Research in Academic Health Centers.Washington, DC: Association of Academic Health Centers, 1991: 23-72.
Scutchfield FD, Marks JS, Perez DJ, et al.: Public health services and systems research. Am J Prev Med. 2007; 33: 169-171.
Mays GP, Halverson PK, Scuthfield FD: Behind the curve? What we know and need to know from public health systems research. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2003; 9(3): 179-182.
Lenaway D, Halverson P, Sotnikov S, et al.: Public health systems research: Setting a national agenda. Am J Public Health. 2006; 96(3): 410-413.
Norris FH, Friedman MJ,Watson PJ, et al.: 60,000 disaster victims speak, Part I: An empirical review of the empirical literature 1981-2001. Psychiatry. 2002; 65(3): 207-239.
Galea S, Ahern J, Resnick H, et al.: Psychological sequelae of the September 11 terrorist attacks in New York City. New Engl J Med. 2002; 346(13): 982-987.
Ursano RJ, Cerise FP, DeMartino R, et al.: The impact of disasters and their aftermath on mental health. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006; 67(1): 7-14.
Institute of Medicine: Preparing for the Psychological Consequences of Terrorism: A Public Health Strategy.Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2003.
Baum F, MacDougall C, Smith D: Participatory action research. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006; 60: 854-857.
Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, et al.: Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998; 19: 173-202.
Viswanathan M, Ammerman A, Eng E, et al.: Community-Based Participatory Research: Assessing the evidence. Summary, Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 99 (Prepared by RTI-University of North Carolina Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-02-0016). AHRQ Publication 04-E002-1. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, August 2004.
Green LW, Levine DM, Deeds S: Clinical trials of health education for hypertensive outpatients: Design and baseline data. Prev Med. 1975; 4: 417-425.
Mittlemark MB, Hunt MK, Heath GW, et al.: Realistic outcomes: Lessons from community-based research and demonstration programs for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases. J Public Health Policy. 1993; 14(4): 437-462.
Angell KL, Kreshka MA, McCoy R, et al.: Psychosocial intervention for rural women with breast cancer. J Intern Med. 2003; 18(7): 499-507.
Stevens PE, Hall JM: Participatory action research for sustaining individual and community change: A model of HIV prevention education. AIDS Educ Prev. 1998; 10(5): 387-402.
Wagenaar AC, Murray DM, Wolfson M, et al.: Communities mobilizing for change on alcohol: Design of a randomized community trial. J Community Psychol. 1994; special issue: 79-101.
Aguirre-Molina M, Gorman DM: Community-based approaches for the prevention of alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use. Annu Rev Public Health. 1996; 17: 337-358.
Hagan M, Lincoln A, Delman J: Engaging persons with psychiatric and substance abuse disorders in a community-based participatory research initiative: The Boston Community Academic Mental Health Partnership, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, November 3-7, 2007.
Boutin-Foster C, Phillips E, Palermo A, et al.: The role of community- academic partnerships: Implications for medical education, research, and patient care. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2008; 2(1): 55-60.
Anderson LS, Royster MO, Bailey N, et al.: Integrating servicelearning into an MPH curriculum for future public health practitioners: Strengthening community-campus partnerships. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2011; 17(4): 324-327.
Schmittdeil JA, Grumbach K, Selby JV: System-based participatory research in health care: Approach for sustainable research and quality improvement. Ann Fam Med. 2010; 8(3): 256-259.
Israel BA, Coombe CM, Cheezum RR, et al.: Community-based participatory research: A capacity-building approach for policy advocacy aimed at eliminating health disparities. Am J Public Health. 2010; 100(11): 2094-2102.
O’Brien MJ, Whitaker RC: The role of community-based research to inform local policy: A case study. J Gen Intern Med. 2011; 26(12): 1498-1501.
Perry M: Learning from others: The scope and challenge of participatory disaster risk assessment. Disasters. 2007; 31(4): 373- 385.
Gershon RRM, Rubin MS, Qureshi KA, et al.: Participatory methodology in disaster research: Results from the World Trade Center evacuation study. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008; 2(3): 142-149.
Nepal V, Banerjee D, Slentz M: Community-based participatory research in disaster preparedness among linguistically isolated populations: A public health perspective. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010; 5(4): 53-63.
Smith KE, Bambra C, Joyce KE, et al.: Partners in health? A systematic review of the impact of organizational partnerships on public health outcomes in England between 1997 and 2008. J Public Health. 2009; 31(2): 210-221.
Bandura A: Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman, 1997.
Ispwoods: Sanctuaries of Hope [video file]. Available at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3vvIJ1CnQE. Accessed January 21, 2011.
Miller WR, Rollnick S: Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press, 2002.
McCabe OL, DiClemente CC, Links JM: Applying behavioral science to workforce challenges in the public health emergency preparedness system. Am J Disaster Med. 2012; 7(2): 155-166.
McCabe OL, Mosley AM, Gwon HS, et al.: The tower of ivory meets the house of worship: Psychological first aid training for the faith community. Int J Emerg Ment Health. 2007; 9(3): 171-180.
McCabe OL, Lating JM, Everly GS, et al.: Psychological first aid training for the faith community: A model curriculum. Int J Emerg Ment Health. 2007; 9(3): 181-192.
McCabe OL, Perry C, Azur M, et al.: Psychological first aid training for paraprofessionals: A systems-based model for enhancing capacity of rural emergency response. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2011; 26(4): 1-8.
McCabe OL, Perry C, Azur M, et al.: Guided preparedness planning with lay communities: A systems-based model for enhancing capacity of rural emergency response. Prehosp Disaster Med. In press.
Bailey M, Perry C, MacLaughlin C, et al.: Faith-based Initiative, Roundtable Presentation, Public Health Preparedness Summit, San Diego, CA, February 19, 2009.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright 2007-2023, Weston Medical Publishing, LLC
All Rights Reserved
