Low-dose versus high-dose methadone for the management of neonatal abstinence syndrome
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5055/jom.2019.0497Keywords:
methadone, neonatal abstinence syndrome, withdrawal, pediatricsAbstract
Objectives: The primary objective was to compare median time to symptom relief (time from methadone initiation until two consecutive modified Finnegan [neonatal abstinence syndrome, NAS] scores < 8) between neonates receiving low-dose (≤0.275 mg/kg/day) versus high-dose (>0.275 mg/kg/day) methadone. Secondary objectives included assessment of factors associated with symptom relief.
Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study.
Setting: Ninety-nine bed neonatal intensive care unit within a tertiary-care academic hospital.
Participants: Seventy-two neonates who received methadone for NAS over a 7.5-year period.
Main outcome measures(s): Kaplan-Meier curves with a log-rank test and a stepwise Cox proportional-hazard model were used to analyze outcomes.
Results: The median dose for the low-dose (n = 40) and high-dose (n = 32) groups were 0.19 mg/kg/day (interquartile range [IQR], 0.12-0.24) divided every 6-12 hours and 0.4 mg/kg/day (0.3-0.44) divided every 6-8 hours, respectively. The median time to symptom relief was higher in the low-dose versus high-dose groups, 9.3 (5.8-24.6) versus 6.0 (5.4-12.5) hours, respectively (p = 0.014). Low-dose males had a longer time to symptom resolution than other groups (p = 0.008). Female premature neonates (<37 weeks gestation) had a shorter time to symptom relief than term neonates [adjusted hazard ratio = 2.96 (1.02-8.62)]. The median total duration of methadone was shorter but not statistically significant between high- versus low-dose groups, 17.5 (IQR: 11.0-25.0) versus 21.0 days (IQR: 10.0-28.0), respectively (p = 0.483).
Conclusions: Neonates receiving high-dose methadone had a significantly shorter time to symptom relief. Differences in sex were noted in response to therapy with low-dose males having a longer time to symptom relief and premature neonates a shorter time to symptom relief.
References
Tolia VN, Patrick SW, Bennett MM, et al.: Increasing incidence of the neonatal abstinence syndrome in U.S. neonatal ICUs. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372: 2118-2126.
Hudak ML, Tan RC, Committee on Drugs and Committee on Fetus and Newborn: Neonatal drug withdrawal. Pediatrics. 2012; 129: e540-e560.
Finnegan LP: Neonatal abstinence. In Nelson NM (ed.): Current Therapy in Neonatal–Perinatal Medicine. 2nd ed. Toronto, ON: BC Decker Inc., 1990.
Lainwala S, Brown ER, Weinschenk NP, et al.: A retrospective study of LOS in infants treated for neonatal abstinence syndrome with methadone versus oral morphine preparations. Adv Neonatal Care. 2005; 5: 265-272.
Backes CH, Backes CR, Gardner D, et al.: Neonatal abstinence syndrome: Transitioning methadone-treated infants from an inpatient to an outpatient setting. J Perinatol. 2012; 32: 425-430.
Brown MS, Hayes MJ, Thornton LM: Methadone versus morphine for treatment of neonatal abstinence syndrome: A prospective randomized clinical trial. J Perinatol. 2015; 35: 278-283.
Young ME, Hager SJ, Spurlock D: Retrospective chart review comparing morphine and methadone in neonates treated for neonatal abstinence syndrome. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2015; 72: S162-S167.
Ibach BW, Johnson PN, Ernst KD, et al.: Initial dosing and taper complexity of methadone and morphine for treatment of neonatal abstinence syndrome. J Pharm Tech. 2016; 32: 216-222.
Lexi-Comp Online™, Pediatric and Neonatal Lexi-Drugs™ [package insert]. Methadone monograph. Hudson, OH: Lexi Comp, Inc., January 24, 2018.
Micromedex® NeoFax® Mobile [package insert]. Methadone monograph. Ann Arbor, MI: Truven Health Analytics, Inc., January 24, 2018.
Hurley RW, Adams MCB: Sex, gender, and pain: An overview of a complex field. Anesth Analg. 2008; 107: 309-317.
Pud D, Yarnitsky D, Sprecher E, et al.: Can personality traits and gender predict the response to morphine? An experimental cold pain study. Eur J Pain. 2006; 10: 103-112.
Sarton E, Olofsen E, Romberg R, et al.: Sex differences in morphine analgesia: An experimental study in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology. 2000; 93: 1245-1254.
Fillingim RB, Ness TJ, Glover TL, et al.: Morphine responses and experimental pain: Sex differences in side effects and cardiovascular responses but not analgesia. J Pain. 2005; 6: 116-124.
Romberg R, Olofsen E, Sarton E, et al.: Pharmacokinetic pharmacodynamic modeling of morphine-6-glucuronideinduced analgesia in healthy volunteers: Absence of sex differences. Anesthesiology. 2004; 100: 120-133.
Wiles JR, Isemann B, Mizuno T, et al.: Pharmacokinetics of oral methadone in the treatment of neonatal abstinence syndrome: A pilot study. J Pediatr. 2015; 167: 1214-1220.
Kearns GL, Abdel-Rahman SM, Alander SW, et al.: Developmental pharmacology—Drug disposition, action, and therapy in infants and children. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349: 1157-1167.
Lammers EM, Johnson PN, Ernst KD, et al.: Association of fentanyl with neurodevelopmental outcomes in very-low-birthweight infants. Ann Pharmacother. 2014; 48: 335-342.
McPherson C, Haslam M, Pineda R, et al.: Brain injury and development in preterm infants exposed to fentanyl. Ann Pharmacother. 2015; 49: 1291-1297.
de Graaf J, van Lingen RA, Simons SHP, et al.: Long-term effects of routine morphine infusion in mechanically ventilated neonates on children's functioning: Five-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Pain. 2011; 152: 1391-1397.
Kaltenbach K, Jones HE: Neonatal abstinence syndrome: Presentation and treatment considerations. J Addict Med. 2016; 10: 217-223.
Sarkar S, Donn SM: Management of neonatal abstinence syndrome in neonatal intensive care units: A national survey. J Perinatol. 2006; 26: 15-17.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright 2005-2024, Weston Medical Publishing, LLC
All Rights Reserved