Why do emergency providers choose one opioid over another? A prospective cohort analysis

Alec B. O’Connor, MD, MPH

doi:10.5055/jom.2012.0140

Authors

Alec B. O’Connor, MD, MPH

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5055/jom.2012.0140

Keywords:

opioid, parenteral, morphine, hydromorphone, emergency department, e-prescribing, equianalgesic dosing

Abstract

Objective: The reasons providers choose one parenteral opioid over another are not well understood. The authors sought to determine why emergency department (ED) providers choose one parenteral opioid over another.
Methods: In a cohort of ED patients who received intravenous morphine or hydromorphone, the authors prospectively assessed patient and provider factors associated with choice of opioid, which were included in regression analyses to identify independent predictors of hydromorphone prescription. Providers were also asked in real time why they chose one opioid over another for a specific patient. Narrative responses were coded and analyzed.
Results: Opioid choice was tightly linked with equianalgesic dose, with the median hydromorphone dosage more than 50 percent higher than the dosage of morphine. Besides dose, choice of hydromorphone was most strongly associated with home opioid use and a diagnosis of kidney stone. Provider preference or habit was the most commonly cited reason for choosing the prescribed opioid, with the majority of those responses given by providers who prescribed morphine. One-fourth of morphine prescribers stated that the patient required a lower dosage or less potent option; one-fourth of hydromorphone prescribers stated that either the patient required a higher dosage or more potent option or hydromorphone is more effective. In total, 46 percent of providers gave a reason that does not seem to have pharmacologic validity.
Conclusions: ED providers seem to prescribe “usual” dosages of morphine and relatively higher usual dosages of hydromorphone. The reasons for choosing one opioid over the other for a specific patient vary from simple preference to common misconceptions about opioid pharmacology. Improved understanding of opioid pharmacology may improve analgesic outcomes for some patients.
Keywords: opioid, parenteral, morphine, hydromorphone, emergency department, prescribing, equianalgesic dosing DOI:10.5055/jom.2012.0140

References

Rupp T, Delaney KA: Inadequate analgesia in emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med. 2004; 43: 494-503.

Selbst SM, Clark M: Analgesic use in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1990; 19: 1010-1013.

Chang AK, Bijur PE, Meyer RH, et al.: Safety and efficacy of hydromorphone as an analgesic alternative to morphine in acute pain: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2006; 48: 164-172.

Wilson JE, Pendleton JM: Oligoanalgesia in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 1989; 7: 620-623.

O’Connor AB, Zwemer FL, Hays DP, et al.: Outcomes after intravenous opioids in emergency patients: A prospective cohort analysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2009; 16: 477-487.

O’Connor AB, Lang VJ, Quill TE: Eliminating analgesic meperidine use with a supported formulary restriction. Am J Med. 2005; 118: 885-889.

Todd KH, Ducharme J, Choiniere M, et al., for the PEMI Study Group: Pain in the emergency department: Results of the pain and emergency medicine initiative (PEMI) multicenter study. J Pain. 2007; 8: 460-466.

Gustein HB, Akil H: Opioid analgesics. In Brunton L, Lazo J, Parker K (eds.): Goodman & Gillman’s the Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 11th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2006: 547-590.

Inturrisi CE: Clinical pharmacology of opioids for pain. Clin J Pain. 2002; 18: S3-S13.

O’Connor AB, Lang VJ, Quill TE: Under-dosing of morphine in comparison to other parenteral opioids in an acute hospital: A quality of care challenge. Pain Med. 2006; 7: 299-307.

O’Connor AB, Zwemer FL, Hays DP, et al.: Intravenous opioid dosing and outcomes in emergency patients: A prospective cohort analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2010; 28: 1041-1050.

Cobaugh DJ, Spillane LL, Schneider SM: Research subject enroller program: A key to successful emergency medicine research. Acad Emerg Med. 1997; 4: 231-233.

Principles of Analgesic Use in the Treatment of Acute Pain and Cancer Pain. 6th ed. Glenview, IL: American Pain Society, 2008.

Patanwala AE, Duby J, Waters D, et al.: Opioid conversions in acute care. Ann Pharmacother. 2007; 41: 255-266.

Thompson DR: Narcotic analgesic effects on the sphincter of Oddi: A review of the data and therapeutic implications in treating pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001; 96: 1266-1272.

Niscola P, Scaramucci L, Vischini G, et al.: The use of major analgesics in patients with renal dysfunction. Curr Drug Targets. 2010; 11: 752-758.

Sandhu S, Driscoll P, Nancarrow J, et al.: Analgesia in the accident and emergency department: Do SHOs have the knowledge to provide optimal analgesia? J Accid Emerg Med. 1998; 15: 147-150.

Jacobsen R, Sjøgren P, Moldrup C, et al.: Physician-related barriers to cancer pain management with opioid analgesics: A systematic review. J Opioid Manag. 2007; 3: 207-214.

Wu HB, Lee MC, Lai KH, et al.: Physicians’ knowledge about pharmacological management of cancer pain–With special reference on their prescribing responses to simulated patients with cancer pain. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2006; 44: 61-71.

Jones JB: Assessment of pain management skills in emergency medicine residents: The role of a pain education program. J Emerg Med. 1999; 17: 349-354.

Decosterd I, Hugli O, Tamachès E, et al.: Oligoanalgesia in the emergency department: Short-term beneficial effects of an education program on acute pain. Ann Emerg Med. 2007; 50:462-471.

Heins JK, Heins A, Grammas M, et al.: Disparities in analgesia and opioid prescribing practices for patients with musculoskeletal pain in the emergency department. J Emerg Nurs. 2006; 32: 219-224.

Tamayo-Sarver JH, Dawson NV, Cydulka RK, et al.: Variability in emergency physician decision making about prescribing opioid analgesics. Ann Emerg Med. 2004; 43: 483-493