The characteristics of postoperative fentanyl effect-site concentration during intravenous fentanyl analgesia after posterior lumbar spine fusion

Authors

  • Tsunehisa Sato, MD
  • Mutsuhito Kikura, MD
  • Shigehito Sato, MD, PhD

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5055/jom.2013.0176

Keywords:

fentanyl, intravenous fentanyl analgesia, effect-site concentration, simulation, lumbar spine fusion

Abstract

Objective: To examine the characteristics of postoperative fentanyl effect-site concentrations during intravenous analgesia in patients requiring or not requiring a fentanyl bolus and in patients with or without postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).

Design: Retrospective observational study.

Setting: University-affiliated general hospital.

Patients: Sixty patients who underwent posterior lumbar spine fusion.

Main outcome measures: The authors simulated the fentanyl effect-site concentration for 48 postoperative hours and compared it between patients who did and did not require a fentanyl bolus and between patients who did and did not experience PONV.

Results: At the end of anesthesia, the fentanyl effect-site concentration was similar between 37 (61.7 percent) patients requiring and 23 (38.3 percent) patients not requiring a postoperative fentanyl bolus (p = 0.97). Within the first 12 postoperative hours, the concentration decreased in both groups (p < 0.01). The fentanyl effect-site concentration was higher in patients requiring a postoperative fentanyl bolus (within 12 hours, 1.4 ± 0.32 ng/mL vs 0.89 ± 0.35 ng/mL; between 12 and 48 hours, 0.94 ± 0.19 ng/mL vs 0.57 ± 0.09 ng/mL) (p < 0.05). PONV occurred in 22 (36.6 percent) patients, but more so in women (68.2 percent; p < 0.01); PONV was similar between patients requiring and not requiring a fentanyl bolus (p = 0.78). Between the 12th and 48th postoperative hours, fentanyl effect-site concentrations were higher in patients with PONV (0.61 ± 0.10 ng/mL vs 0.57 ± 0.10 ng/mL, p = 0.03).

Conclusions: Patients needing a postoperative fentanyl bolus require a higher fentanyl effect-site concentration possibly because of individual variations, and PONV depends on the postoperative fentanyl effect-site concentration.

Author Biographies

Tsunehisa Sato, MD

Staff Anesthesiologist, Department of Anesthesiology, Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan

Mutsuhito Kikura, MD

Chief in Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan

Shigehito Sato, MD, PhD

Professor and Chairman, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan

References

Grass JA: Patient-controlled analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2005; 101: S44-S61.

Macintyre PE: Safety and efficacy of patient-controlled analgesia. Br J Anaesth. 2001; 87: 36-46.

Kikura M, Takada T, Sato S: Preexisting morbidity as an independent risk factor for perioperative acute thromboembolism syndrome. Arch Surg. 2005; 140: 1210-1217; discussion 8.

Gourlay GK, Kowalski SR, Plummer JL, et al.: Fentanyl blood concentration-analgesic response relationship in the treatment of postoperative pain. Anesth Analg. 1988; 67: 329-337.

Woodhouse A, Mather LE: The minimum effective concentration of opioids: A revisitation with patient controlled analgesia fentanyl. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000; 25: 259-267.

Apfel CC, Korttila K, Abdalla M, et al.: A factorial trial of six interventions for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350: 2441-2451.

Shafer SL, Gregg KM: Algorithms to rapidly achieve and maintain stable drug concentrations at the site of drug effect with a computer-controlled infusion pump. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1992; 20: 147-169.

Joris J, Thiry E, Paris P, et al.: Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Characteristics and effect of intraperitoneal bupivacaine. Anesth Analg. 1995; 81: 379-384.

Chen WH, Liu K, Tan PH, et al.: Effects of postoperative background PCA morphine infusion on pain management and related side effects in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. J Clin Anesth. 2011; 23: 124-129.

Iwakiri H, Nagata O, Matsukawa T, et al.: Effect-site concentration of propofol for recovery of consciousness is virtually independent of fentanyl effect-site concentration. Anesth Analg. 2003; 96: 1651-1655, table of contents.

Watcha MF, White PF: Postoperative nausea and vomiting. Its etiology, treatment, and prevention. Anesthesiology. 1992; 77: 162-184.

Dolin SJ, Cashman JN: Tolerability of acute postoperative pain management: Nausea, vomiting, sedation, pruritus, and urinary retention. Evidence from published data. Br J Anaesth. 2005; 95: 584-591.

George JA, Lin EE, Hanna MN, et al.: The effect of intravenous opioid patient-controlled analgesia with and without background infusion on respiratory depression: A meta-analysis. J Opioid Manag. 2010; 6: 47-54.

Published

09/01/2013

How to Cite

Sato, MD, T., M. Kikura, MD, and S. Sato, MD, PhD. “The Characteristics of Postoperative Fentanyl Effect-Site Concentration During Intravenous Fentanyl Analgesia After Posterior Lumbar Spine Fusion”. Journal of Opioid Management, vol. 9, no. 5, Sept. 2013, pp. 335-42, doi:10.5055/jom.2013.0176.