Reference intervals: A novel approach to detect drug abuse in a pain patient population
Keywords:reference interval, morphine, drug abuse, upper limits of excretion, pain patients, drug testing
AbstractBackground: Pain physicians have few objective ways of determining which of their patients are drug abusers. Traditionally, these include psychological tests, physical examination, patient history, and urine drug testing. The traditional urine drug testing information provided to pain physicians mainly identifies patient compliance or drug diversion with qualitative information, that is, the patient is positive or negative for the presence of the drug in excreted urine. Although this information is useful for establishing compliance and identifying diversion, it is incomplete because it does not identify drug abuse.
Objective: The authors endeavored to determine whether quantitative urine drug testing and mathematical estimators of the upper limits of excretion could be used to identify possible drug abusers.
Study Design: Analysis of quantitative urine drug tests and application of mathematical models for reference interval estimation of common analytes to determine whether they could be used to define upper 97.5 percentile limits of excretion in the pain patient population.
Methods: The authors analyzed 8,971 consecutive urines from patients on chronic opioid therapy using nonparametric, parametric, robust, and transformed estimators to derive the upper 97.5 percentile concentration values of 31 drugs and their metabolites.
Results: The authors showed that the mathematical models used to define reference intervals could be applied to urinary drug excretion. As an example, an upper limit of excretion of approximately 100,000 ng/mL was established for morphine. Limitations of the study included lack of information on medication history, time of last dose before urine collection, age, sex, and complete medical history. Better estimates of the upper limits of excretion can be obtained by physicians applying their knowledge of dosage and collection times.
Conclusions: Application of a reference interval model allows identification of a patient population that excretes extremely high amounts of drug or its metabolite when compared with the rest of the population. Explanations for this high excretion include high dosage medication by prescription and drug abuse, determination of which can be done by the treating physician. The authors suggest that this patent-applied-for analytical model can become a potential tool to alert physicians to patients who may be abusing drugs.
Kuehn BM: Efforts aim to curb opioid deaths, injuries. JAMA. 2009; 301(12): 1213-1215.
Manchikanti L, Damron KS, McManus C, et al.: Patterns of illicit drug use and opioid abuse in patients with chronic pain at initial evaluation: A prospective observational study. Pain Physician. 2004; 7: 431-437.
Manchikanti L, Cash KA, Damron KS, et al.: Controlled substance abuse and illicit drug use in chronic pain patients: An evaluation of multiple variables. Pain Physician. 2006; 9: 215-226.
Reisfield GM, Wilson GR: Are some physicians unwitting enablers of prescription opioid abuse? J Opioid Manag. 2009; 5(2): 71-73.
Sloan PA: Opioid risk management: Understanding FDA mandated risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS). J Opioid Manag. 2009; 5(3): 131-133.
Smith HS, Kirsh KL, Passik SD: Chronic opioid therapy issues associated with opioid abuse potential. J Opioid Manag. 2009; 5(5): 287-300.
Trescot AM, Helm S, Hansen H, et al.: Opioids in the management of chronic non-cancer pain: An update of American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians’ (ASIPP) Guidelines. Pain Physician. 2008; 11: S5-S62.
Chou R, Fanciullo G, Fine P, et al.: Clinical guidelines for the use of chronic opioid therapy in chronic noncancer pain. J Pain. 2009; 10(2): 113-130.
Manchikanti L, Atluri S, Trescot AM, et al.: Monitoring opioid adherence in chronic pain patients: Tools, techniques, and utility. Pain Physician. 2008; 11(2 Suppl): S155-S180.
Manchikanti L, Manchukonda R, Pampati, et al.: Does random urine drug testing reduce illicit drug use in chronic pain patients receiving opioids? Pain Physician. 2006; 9: 123-129.
Cone EJ, Caplan YH, Black DL, et al.: Urine drug testing of chronic pain patients: Licit and illicit drug patterns. J Anal Toxicol. 2008; 32: 530-543.
Baselt RC: Disposition of Toxic Drugs and Chemicals in Man. 7th ed. Foster City, CA: Biomedical Publications, 2004.
White RM: And Black ML Pain Management Testing Reference. 1st ed. Washington, DC: AACC Press, 2007: 285.
Horn P: Reference intervals and clinical decision limits. In Kaplan L, Pesce A (eds.): Clinical Chemistry: Theory, Analysis, Correlation. 5th Ed. St. Louis: Mosby/Elsevier, 2010: 439-455.
Horn PA, Pesce AJ: Reference Intervals: A User’s Guide. Washington, DC: AACC Press, 2005.
Horowitz GL, Altaie S, Boyd JC, et al.: Defining, Establishing, and Verifying Rerference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory; Approved Guideline. 3rd Ed. CLSI Document: C-28-A3. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2008.
Mohsin S, Yang Y, Zumwalt M: Quantitative analysis of opiates in urine using RRHT LC/MS/MS. Agilent Application. Santa Clara, CA: Agilent Technologies, Inc.
Target compound identification and quantitation procedure. Agilent Technologies, Inc [MSD ChemStation Data Analysis]. Accessed March 20, 2002.
Crews B, Mikel C, Latyshev S, et al.: 6-Acetylmorphine detected in the absence of morphine in pain management patients. Ther Drug Monit. 2009; 31: 749-752.
Mikel C, Almazan P, West R, et al.: LC-MS/MS extends the range of drug analysis in pain patients. Ther Drug Monit. 2009; 31(6): 746-748.
How to Cite
Copyright 2005-2023, Weston Medical Publishing, LLC
All Rights Reserved