One neighborhood, two families: A comparison of intergovernmental emergency management relationships

Authors

  • David A. McEntire, PhD
  • John R. Lindsay, MCP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.2012.0090

Keywords:

emergency management, Canada, United States, federalism

Abstract

This article provides a comparative study of the emergency management systems in Canada and the United States, paying special attention to the nature of intergovernmental relations in these two neighboring countries. This article first provides background information on the challenge of intergovernmental coordination in emergency management. It then explores the similar and distinct contexts of emergency management in Canada and the United States. A discussion of the methods used for this study follows. Findings of the research are presented along with a discussion about the results of this study. This article concludes with implications for emergency management. The major lesson of this research is that even similar sociopolitical contexts may result in very different emergency management approaches, and emergency managers should understand how this impacts their work.

Author Biographies

David A. McEntire, PhD

Associate Professor, Emergency Administration and Planning, Department of Public Administration, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas.

John R. Lindsay, MCP

Assistant Professor, Applied Disaster and Emergency Studies, Brandon University, Brandon, Manitoba, Canada.

References

Quarantelli EL: The environmental disasters of the future will be more and worse, but the prospect is not hopeless. Disaster Prev Manag. 1992; 2(1): 11-25.

Quarantelli EL: Problematical aspects of the information/communication revolution for disaster planning and research:Ten non-technical issues and questions. Disaster Prev Manag. 1997; 6(2): 94-106.

Mileti D: Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States.Washington, DC; Joseph Henry Press, 1999.

Waugh WL Jr, Tierney K (eds.): Emergency Management: Principles and Practices for Local Government.Washington, DC: ICMA, 2008.

Enarson E: Identifying and addressing social vulnerabilities. In Waugh WL Jr, Tierney K (eds.): Emergency Management: Principles and Practices for Local Government.Washington, DC: ICMA, 2008: 257-278.

Drabek TE: Human System Responses to Disaster. New York: Springer, 1986.

Peacock WG: Cross-national and comparative disaster research. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 1997; 15(1): 117-133.

Britton NR: National planning and response. In Rodriguez H, Quarantelli EL, Dynes RR (eds.): Handbook of Disaster Research. New York: Springer, 2006: 347-367.

McEntire DA: Disaster Response and Recovery: Strategies and Tactics for Resilience. Hoboken, NY:Wiley, 2007.

Dynes RR: Cross-cultural international research: Sociology and disaster. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 1988; 6(2): 101-129.

Cory DN: Coordinating intergovernmental polices on emergency management in a multi-centered metropolis. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 1998; 16(1): 45-54.

Denis H: Coordination in a Governmental Disaster Mega-Organization. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 1995; 13(1): 25-43.

Drabek TE: Managing the emergency response. Public Adm Rev. 1985; 45(January): 85-92.

McEntire DA: Local emergency management organizations. In Rodriguez H, Quarantelli EL, Dynes RR (eds.): Handbook of Disaster Research. New York: Springer, 2006: 168-182.

Toulmin LM, Givans CJ, Steel DL: The impact of intergovernmental distance on disaster communications. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 1989; 7(2): 116-132.

Drabek TE: Predicting response effectiveness. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 2005; 23(1): 49-72.

Waugh WL Jr, Streib G: Collaboration and leadership for effective emergency management. Public Adm Rev. 2006; 66(December): 131-144.

Drabek TE, McEntire DA: Emergent phenomena and multiorganizational coordination in disasters: Lessons from the research literature. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 2002; 20(August): 199-214.

Irwin RL: The Incident Command System (ICS). In Auf der Heide E (ed.): Disaster Response: Principles of Preparation and Coordination. St Louis, MO: C.V. Mosby, 1989: 133-161.

CIA: WorldFact Book, 2011. Available at https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/. Accessed January 26, 2011.

Miskel JF: Disaster Response and Homeland Security: What Works,What Doesn’t. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2008.

Lindsay JR: Emergency Management in Canada: Near Misses and Moving Targets. Emmitsburg, MD: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2008. Available at http://training.fema.gov/EMIWeb/edu/CompEmMgmtBookProject.asp. Accessed January 7, 2011.

McEntire DA: Emergency Management in the United States: Disaster Experience, Lessons Learned and Recommendations for the Future. Emmitsburg, MD: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2008. Available at http://training.fema.gov/EMIWeb/edu/CompEmMgmtBookProject.asp. Accessed January 7, 2011.

Pacific Coast Collaborative: Available at http://www.pacificcoastcollaborative.org/priorities/emergency/Pages/emergency.aspx. Accessed March 22, 2011.

Department of National Defence: 2011 Framework for Enhanced Military Cooperation among North American Aerospace Defense Command, United States Northern Command, and Canada Command. Available at http://www.canadacom.forces.gc.ca/par-par/canus-caneu/frm-frm-eng.asp. Accessed April 2, 2011.

Rubin CB: Emergency Management: The American Experience 1900-2005. Fairfax, VA: PERI, 2007.

Henstra D, McBean G: Canadian disaster management: Moving toward a paradigm shift? Can Public Policy. 2005; 31(3): 303-318.

Public Safety Canada: Powers of the National and Provincial Governments, 2011. Available at http://www2.parl.gc.ca/Sites/LOP/AboutParliament/Forsey/powers_of_govt_02-e.asp. Accessed February 19, 2011.

Phillips L: Canada’s internal security. Can J Econ Polit Sci. 1946; 12(1): 18-29.

Canada. Emergencies Act R.S.C. 1985, c. 22 (4th Supp), 1988.

Henstra D: Explaining local policy choices: A multiple streams analysis of municipal emergency management. Can Public Adm. 2010; 53(2): 241-258.

Ontario. Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act R.S.O. 1990, c. E.9, 1990.

Field MA: The differing federalisms of Canada and the United States. Law Contemp Probl. 1992: 55(1): 107-120; Comparative United States/Canadian Constitutional Law.

Public Safety Canada. Federal Emergency Response Plan. 2011. Available at http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/prg/em/ferp-eng.aspx. Accessed February 19, 2011.

Canada. Emergency Management Act, S.C. 2007, c. 15, 2007.

Public Safety Canada: An Emergency Management Framework for Canada. 2011.

Public Safety Canada: National Emergency Response System. 2011. Available at http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/prg/em/ners-eng.aspx. Accessed February 19, 2011.

Bea K: The formative years. In Rubin CB (ed.): Emergency Management: The American Experience 1900-2005. Fairfax, VA: PERI, 2007: 81-104.

Platt RH: Disasters and Democracy: The Politics of Extreme Natural Events.Washington, DC: Island Press, 1999.

Moss DA: Courting disaster? The transformation of federal disaster policy since 1803. In Froot KA (ed.): The Financing of Catastrophic Risk. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999: 307-354.

Butler D: The expanding role of government: 1927-1950. In Rubin CB (ed.): Emergency Management: The American Experience 1900-2005. Fairfax, VA: PERI, 2007: 49-74.

Hoover H: The Memoirs of Herbert Hoover: The Cabinet and the Presidency, 1920-1933. New York: Macmillan, 1952.

Sylves RT: Disaster Policy and Politics: Emergency Management and Homeland Security.Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2008: 79.

Sylves RT: Federal emergency management comes of age: 1979-2001. In Rubin CB (ed.): Emergency Management: The American Experience 1900-2005. Fairfax, VA: PERI, 2007: 111-153.

Lewis DE: The Politics of Presidential Appointments: Political Control and Bureaucratic Performance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008: 166.

Harrald JR: Emergency management restructured: Intended and unintended outcomes of actions taken since 9/11. In Rubin CB (ed.): Emergency Management: The American Experience 1900-2005. Fairfax, VA: PERI, 2007: 161-179.

McEntire DA,Dawson G:The intergovernmental context. In Waugh WL Jr, Tierney K (eds.): Emergency Management: Principles and Practices for Local Government.Washington, DC: ICMA, 2008: 57-70.

FEMA: Emergency Management Performance Grants Guidance and Application Kit. 2011. Available at http://www.fema.gov/government/grant/empg/index.shtm. Accessed May 13, 2011.

Public Safety Canada: Joint Emergency Preparedness Program Guidelines. 2011. Available at http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/prg/em/jepp/gl-ld-eng.aspx. Accessed February 19, 2011.

Public Safety Canada: 2008-2009 Summative Evaluation of the Joint Emergency Preparedness Program (JEPP). 2008. Available at http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/abt/dpr/eval/jepp-pcpc-eng.aspx. Accessed February 19, 2011.

Published

03/01/2012

How to Cite

McEntire, PhD, D. A., and J. R. Lindsay, MCP. “One Neighborhood, Two Families: A Comparison of Intergovernmental Emergency Management Relationships”. Journal of Emergency Management, vol. 10, no. 2, Mar. 2012, pp. 93-107, doi:10.5055/jem.2012.0090.