Hydraulic fracturing and the need for risk assessment

Authors

  • Robert O. Schneider, PhD

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.2011.0104

Keywords:

hydraulic fracturing, risk assessment, risk management

Abstract

This analysis examines the perceived lag in the policy process with respect to risk assessment and risk management in relationship to the development of new technologies that have the potential to create new threats to public health and safety. Hydraulic fracturing and the ongoing revolution in natural gas exploration make an excellent case study of the difficulties that inevitably arise, are difficult to resolve, and that expand threats to public health and safety when policy makers do not prioritize risk assessment and risk management until the negative impacts or potential harms of previous decisions are felt. The analysis begins with a description of the hydraulic fracturing revolution and a discussion of the potential risks associated with it. This will include some of the preliminary scientific work on the subject. The analysis will highlight concerns that timely assessment and management of these risks is often frustrated by the policy process itself. In essence, the conclusion reached is that significant improvements in the timely assessing and managing the risks associated with technological advances require policy makers to emulate the emergency management profession in elevating risk assessment and risk management to the level of a first priority in the policy process.

Author Biography

Robert O. Schneider, PhD

Department of Public Administration, University of North Carolina at Pembroke, Pembroke, North Carolina.

References

Botkin DB: Powering the Future. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Person Education, 2010.

Wolensky RP, Wolensky KC: Local government’s problems with disaster management: A literature review and structural analysis. Policy Stud Rev. 1990; 8: 703-725.

Wright JD, Rossi PH: Social Sciences and Natural hazards. Cambridge: ABT Books, 1981.

Kreps GA: Organizing for emergency management. In Drabek TE, Hoetmer GJ (eds.): Emergency Management Principles and Practices for Local Governments. Washington, DC: International City Managers Association, 1991: 30-54.

Grant NK: Emergency management training and education for public administrators. In Sylves RT, Waugh WL (eds.): Disaster Management in the U.S. and Canada. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, 1996: 313-325.

Sylves RT: Redesigning and administering federal emergency management. In Sylves RT,Waugh WL (eds.): Disaster Management in the U.S. and Canada. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, 1996: 5-25.

Schneider RO: An overview of the new emergency management. J Emer Manag. 2004; 2(1): 25-29.

Kirby A: Nothing to Fear: Risks and Hazards in American Society. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press, 1990.

Leung M, Lambert JH, Mosenthal A: A risk-based approach to setting priorities in protecting bridges against terrorist attacks. Risk Anal. 2004; 24(4): 963-984.

Katusa M: The Fracking Controversy. Financial Sense. Available at http://www.investorsinsight.com/blogs/casey_research/archive/2011/05/19/the-fracking-controversy.aspx. Accessed December 5, 2011.

Maugeri L: Beyond the Age of Oil. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger, 2010.

Earth Works Station: Hydraulic Fracturing 101. Available at http://www.earthworksaction.org/issues/detail/hydraulic_fracturing_101. Accessed December 5, 2011.

Zoback M, Kitasei S, Copithorne B: Addressing the environmental risks from shale gas development. Paper presented at the Worldwatch Institute Briefing Paper 1, Worldwatch Institute, Bucknell University, Washington, DC, July 1010. Available at http://blogs.worldwatch.org/revolt/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Environmental-Risks-Paper-July-2010-FOR-PRINT.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2011.

Revesz KM, Breen KJ, Baldassare AJ, et al.: Carbon and hydrogen isotopic evidence for the origin of combustible gasses in water supply wells in north-central Pennsylvania. Appl Geochem. 2010; 25: 1845-1859.

Schneider RO: Ethics and oil: Preventing the next disaster. J Emer Manag. 2011; 9(8): 11-22.

Hanson K: Safety, corporate responsibility, and the oil spill. Available at http://www.scu.edu/ethics/practicing/focusareas/business/bp.html. Accessed December 5, 2011.

Ott R: Sound Truth and Corporate Myth: The Legacy of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill. Cordova, AK: Dragonfly Sisters Press, 2005.

Beder S: Global Spin. Glasgow, UK: Green Books, 2002.

Merrill R: Activism in the 90’s: Changing rules for public relations. Public Relat Q. 1991; 36(3): 28-32.

Lindheim J: Restoring the image of the chemical industry. Chem Ind. 1989; 15: 491-494.

Sustainablebusiness.com: Fracking lobby outspends environmental groups 4-1. Available at http://www.sustainablebusiness.com/index.cfm/go/news.display/id/22232. Accessed May 25, 2011.

Bruzelius N: EPA turnaround: Collecting data on fracking risks just might be a good idea. Available at http://www.ewg.org/kidsafe-chemicals-act-blog/2010/03/epa-turnaround-collecting-data- on-fracking-risks-just-might-be-a-good-idea/. Accessed May 25, 2011.

Skrapits E: Environmental watchdog outlines fracking risk. Citizensvoice.com. Available at http://citizensvoice.com/news/drilling/environmental-watchdog-outlines-fracking-risks-1.1115694#axzz1fgxmf9wc. Accessed December 5, 2011.

Civil Society Institute: Drinking water pollution concerns fueling awareness among Americans of fracking used to extract natural gas. Available at http://www.civilsocietyinstitute.org/media.a122110release.cfm. Accessed June 8, 2011.

Osborn SG, Vengosh A,Warner RW, et al.: Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108(20):8172- 8176.

Howarth RW, Santoro R, Ingraffea A: Methane and the greenhouse- gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations. Clim Change. 2011; 106: 679-690.

Shindell DT, Faluvegi G, Koch DM, et al.: Improved attribution of climate forcing to emissions. Science. 2009; 326: 716-718.

Shires TM, Loughran CJ, Jones S, et al.: Compendium of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Methodologies for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry. Prepared by URS Corporation for the American Petroleum Institute.Washington, DC: API, 2009.

Jamarillo P, Griffin WM, Mathews HS: Comparative lifecycle air emissions of coal, domestic natural gas, LNG, and SNG for electricity generation. Environ Sci Technol. 2007; 41: 6290- 6296.

Alexander D: Principles of Emergency Planning and Management. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press, 2002.

Gallant BJ: Essentials in Emergency Management. Langham, MD: Scarecrow Press Inc., 2008.

Clarke L: Mission Improbable: Using Fantasy Documents to Tame Disaster. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1999.

Clay EJ: Katrina: A third world catastrophe? In Richardson HW, Gordon P, Moore JE (eds.): Natural Disaster Analysis After Katrina. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2008.

Energyindepth.org: Hydraulic Fracturing, SDWA, Fluids, and DeGette/Casey. Available at http://www.energyindepth.org/wpcontent/uploads/2009/03/faq_hf_sdwa_fluids_degettecasey.pdf. Accessed June 21, 2011.

Climate Progress: Getting to the bottom of natural gas fracking. Available at http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2010/03/03/205585/natural-gas-fracking/. Accessed December 5, 2011.

S. 1215: Fracturing Responsibility and Awareness of Chemicals (FRAC) Act. Available at http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill_s111-1215. Accessed June 28, 2011.

Chesapeake Energy: Commitment to environmental excellence. Available at http://www.chk.com/Environment/Commitment/Pages/information.aspx. Accessed August 3, 2011.

Published

07/01/2012

How to Cite

Schneider, PhD, R. O. “Hydraulic Fracturing and the Need for Risk Assessment”. Journal of Emergency Management, vol. 10, no. 4, July 2012, pp. 265-76, doi:10.5055/jem.2011.0104.