System dynamics modeling to optimize emergency responders’ emergency and nonemergency efforts: Case study of Air Force Bioenvironmental Engineering combating weapons of mass destruction response capabilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.2010.0041Keywords:
Bioenvironmental Engineering, task management, system dynamics, emergency response trainingAbstract
Objectives: The authors applied a system dynamics model to the problem of optimizing the balance of emergency response training with routine work tasks using a case study of US Air Force Bioenvironmental Engineering units.
Design: A system dynamics model was constructed using available work time inputs for emergency response training and routine task execution. The model generated estimates of task proficiency for emergency and routine tasks.
Setting: The study was conducted using a case study of management of US Air Force Bioenvironmental Engineering units.
Main outcome measures: The model generated estimates of task proficiency (0-100 percent) for emergency and nonemergency tasks based on time allocation policy inputs.
Results: The optimal balance to maintain both emergency and nonemergency task proficiency at or above 70 percent was to have an intensive 2-week period of 35 h/wk devoted to emergency response training, followed by a constant 21 h/wk (52.5 percent of available effort) to emergency response training.
Conclusions: The results reinforce the popular notion that an organization with a significant amount of effort devoted to routine tasks that differ from emergency response tasks will not be able to approach 100 percent readiness task proficiency without significant degradation of routine task proficiency. Synergy of routine task selection to enhance readiness proficiency is essential to maintain emergency response capabilities.
References
Fry MJ, Magazine MJ, Rao US: Firefighter staffing including temporary absences and wastage. Oper Res. 2006; 54(2): 353-365.
Needleman J, Buerhaus P, Mattke S, et al.: Nurse staffing levels and the quality of care in hospitals. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346(22): 1715-1722.
Rossetti MD, Trzcinski GF, Syverud SA: Emergency department simulation and determination of optimal attending physician staffing schedules. In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference.Vol. 2. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society, 1999: 1532-1540.
Gans N, Zhou YP: Managing learning and turnover in employee staffing. Oper Res. 2002; 50(6): 991-1006.
Shelley M: EMGT 642 System Dynamics Analysis Course Syllabus and Materials. OH: Department of Systems and Engineering Management, Air Force Institute of Technology, 2010.
Sterman JD: Appropriate summary statistics for evaluating the historical fit of system dynamics models. DYNAMICA. 1984; 10: 51-61.
Forrester JW, Senge PM: Tests for building confidence in system dynamics models. TIMS Stud Manage Sci. 1980; 14: 209-228.
US Air Force: AFI 10-2501: Air Force Emergency Management (EM) Program Planning and Operations (2007). Available at www.e-publishing.af.mil/shared/media/epubs/AFI10-2501.pdf. Accessed February 12, 2010.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright 2007-2023, Weston Medical Publishing, LLC and Journal of Emergency Management. All Rights Reserved