Cost and benefits of a typical county’s emergency response program

Authors

  • Lillian R. Butterworth, MS
  • Steve Riedel, BS
  • J. Eric Dietz, PhD, PE

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.2011.0064

Keywords:

homeland security, emergency management, sustainment, life cycle cost

Abstract

Threats from natural disasters and terrorist attacks are real and are occurring ever closer to home. The State Homeland Security Program authorizes annual grants to supplement state and local response capabilities. Although county-level emergency management agencies have received grants to enhance response capabilities, analysis tools to strategically manage these new capabilities are still not in place. Through a combination of research, qualitative, and quantitative analysis, this study provides a broad view of the resource-based relationships between a typical Midwest county emergency management agency and its neighboring district counties, as well as other counties and districts within the state. A capabilities assessment and a life cycle cost analysis are also presented to demonstrate ways of valuing response equipment and the future costs associated with replacement, maintenance, and training.

Author Biographies

Lillian R. Butterworth, MS

Lieutenant, United States Coast Guard, MSIA, Krannert School of Management, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.

Steve Riedel, BS

Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.

J. Eric Dietz, PhD, PE

Associate Professor of Computer and Information Technology and the Director of the Purdue Homeland Security Institute, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.

References

House Report 109-377: A failure of initiative: Final report of the Select Bipartisan Committee to investigate the preparation for and response to Hurricane Katrina. February 15, 2006. Available at http://www.gpoaccess.gov/serialset/creports/katrina.html.

Mayer M, Carafano J: After the 9/11 Act: Homeland Security Grant Program Still Moving in the Wrong Direction. Backgrounder (2059). The Heritage Foundation, August 3, 2007.

FEMA: www.FEMA.gov; 2010. Available at http://www.fema.gov/government/grant/hsgp/index.shtm. Accessed April 24, 2010.

Kirby M: Mission of Tippecanoe EMA. Tippecanoe County TEMA Homepage. Available at http://www.tippecanoe.in.gov/TEMA/. Accessed February 26, 2010.

Wainscott JE: Maintenance costs; Memorandum. 2010. Available at http://www.in.gov/dhs/files/revised_guidance_maintenance_costs.pdf.

Google: Google Maps; 2010. Available at www.maps.google.com. Accessed April 23, 2010.

Indiana Department of Homeland Security (IDHS): Mutual Aid Agreement of 2003. Indianapolis: IDHS, 2003.

Published

07/01/2011

How to Cite

Butterworth, MS, L. R., S. Riedel, BS, and J. E. Dietz, PhD, PE. “Cost and Benefits of a Typical county’s Emergency Response Program”. Journal of Emergency Management, vol. 9, no. 4, July 2011, pp. 19-34, doi:10.5055/jem.2011.0064.

Issue

Section

Articles