Impact of personal communication networks on emergency evacuation times
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.2011.0081Keywords:
disaster site evacuation, cell phonesAbstract
Any large-scale anthropogenic or natural disaster, such as a chemical spill, terrorist attack, fire, hurricane, or flooding, impacts human behavior and vehicle movement in the affected area. The response of the affected population is driven by available information about the event. However, inattentiveness to public announcements via vehicle radios, listening to other audio media, and an initial lack of reliable information in the chaotic moments immediately after a disaster will result in an uninformed or misinformed public. For example, the sudden and unannounced nature of a disaster often results in uncertainty with regard to geographic location and extent of the event, resulting in inaccurate information worsened by inattention to public communication. Therefore, the uncertainties and lack of attention to the initial public announcements exacerbate the initial emergency response effort. The question of how the communication network might enhance or diminish the proliferation of information that would facilitate the evacuation of the population must be addressed. Consequently, the authors created a simple model of interpersonal communication via cell phones and their respective personal contact networks to begin a study of the role and impact of information as it passed rapidly through personal communication channels as individuals share in the context of initial repetitive public information during an evolving disaster response. The model demonstrates that increasing the access to mobile phones can significantly improve the speed and degree of success of evacuations.References
Olles DB: Rumor Propagation on Random and Small World Networks [thesis]. Rochester, NY: School of Mathematical Sciences, Rochester Institute of Technology, 2006.
Peters K, Buzna L, Helbing D: Modeling of cascading effects and efficient response to disaster spreading in complex networks. Int J Crit Infrastruct. 2008; 4(1/2): 46-62.
Helbing D, Ammosera H, Kuhnert C: Information flows in hierarchical networks and the capability of organizations to successfully respond to failures, crises, and disasters. Phys A: Stat Mech Appl. 2006; 363(1): 141-150.
Zagorecki A, Ko K, Comfort LK: Interorganizational information exchange and efficiency: Organization performance in emergency environments. J Artif Soc Soc Simul. 2010; 13(3): 3.
Sandman PM: Responding to Community Outrage. Fairfax, VA: American Industrial Hygiene Association, 1993.
Schneider SK: Governmental response to disasters: The conflict between bureaucratic procedures and emergent norms. Public Adm Rev. 1992; 52(2): 135-145.
Butts C: Collaborative Research: Informal Online Communication in Extreme Events: Content, Dynamics, and Structure. NSF Award No. 1031853. 2010.
Lindell MK, Prater CS, Perry RW: Fundamentals of Emergency Management.Washington, DC: FEMA; 2006.
Rosenblatt S, Rainey J: Katrina takes a toll on truth and news accuracy. Los Angles Times. September 27, 2005.
Zizek S: Katrina: Rumors, Lies, and Racist Fantasies. In These Times. October 21, 2005.
Shibutani T: Improvised News: A Sociological Study of Rumor. Indianaplois, IN: Bobbs-Merril, 1996.
The MathWorks: MATLAB®. Natick, MA: The MathWorks, 2010.
Bonabeau E: Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2002; 99(3): 7280-7287.
Wilensky U: NetLogo. Evanston, IL: Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, 1999. Available at http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/. Accessed August 2, 2011.
Arbitron Inc.: Radio Today: How America Listens to Radio. Columbia, MD: Arbitron Inc., 2010.
Gardner LA:Wat 2 Do Abt Txt’n & Drv’n [What to do about the problem of texting while driving?]. CPCU eJournal. 2010; 63: 1-13.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright 2007-2023, Weston Medical Publishing, LLC and Journal of Emergency Management. All Rights Reserved