Community consultation: The foundation of effective risk management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.2003.0008Keywords:
-Abstract
Since the development of the Australian New Zealand Standard on Risk Management (AS/NZ 4360:1995), the philosophy and concepts have been embraced and applied in many contexts outside of the insurance industry. One of these contexts is emergency management.
The reason it has been adopted as a mantra in emergency management is that it appears to make emergency management more “scientific.” There appears to be a generally held belief that the more scientific we become, through the incorporation of numbers, the more it will guarantee our successful management of emergencies and disasters.
Within the standard, there is brief reference to the need for communication with all “stakeholders.” This catch-all phrase would implicitly include the community. But I contend that unless consultation with the community is explicit and specific and we start talking “with” rather than “at” the community, emergency management is treading down a path that could lead to a community perception and reputation that is currently “enjoyed” by the insurance industry.
References
Standards Australia: Australian New Zealand Standard on Risk Management. AS/NZ 4360:1999.
Granger K: Developing an understanding of urban geohazard risk. Aust J Emergency Manag. Summer 1999; 13(4): 13-17.
Buckle P: Re-defining community and vulnerability in the context of emergency management. Presented at Disaster Management: Crisis and Opportunity: Hazard Management and Disaster Preparedness in Australasia and the Pacific Region Conference, James Cook University, Centre for Disaster Studies. Nov 1-4, 1998; Cairns, Queensland, Australia.
Vulnerability Matrix produced by Lunn J, Tasmania State Emergency Service, with input from: Chatfield M, Dodds A, Dutton B, Koob P, Manock I, and Muldoon G. May 17, 1995.
Macken J: Australian Financial Review, BOSS. 2001.
Kirkwood AS: Why do we worry when scientists say there is no risk? Disaster Prev Manag. 1994; 3(2): 15-22.
Nelkin D: Controversy, Third Edition. Sage Publications Inc., 1992.
Japanese Standards Association: Guidelines for development and implementation of risk management systems. Japanese Industrial Standard JIS Q 2001:2001 (E). Tokyo, Japan: Japanese Standards Association, 107-8440.
Massowd G: Business interruption: A risk management primer. Contingency Plan Manag. May 2001: 18-20.
Wenzel J: Risk management: Understanding the process. Contingency Plan Manag. May 2000: 22-25.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright 2007-2023, Weston Medical Publishing, LLC and Journal of Emergency Management. All Rights Reserved