Behavioral and organizational responses to terrorism: A model based on 9/11
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.2003.0032Keywords:
-Abstract
The author’s 1998 white paper (completed for the US Department of Defense as a result of Presidential Decision Directive 39) applied the research literature on behavioral and organizational response to outline what might occur in the aftermath of a terrorist attack. It argued that it presented the best model available and should be applied when developing mitigation, preparedness, and response plans in anticipation of possible domestic nuclear, biological, and chemical terrorism.
The terrorism events of September 11, 2001, have provided a basis for assessing this argument. The current article reviews the earlier argument by using updated disaster research to describe the behavioral and organizational response challenges a community or nation would likely encounter in a terrorist attack with weapons of mass destruction (WMD). Anecdotal evidence from the events of 9/11 is included to assess the efficacy of the literature as a model.
References
Fischer HW: Behavioral response to chemical and biological terrorism. Falls Church, Virginia: White Paper, Research Planning, Inc., 1998.
Presidential Decision Directive 39, PDD-39: United States Policy on Counterterrorism. Washington, DC: The White House, 1995.
Fischer HW: Response to Disaster: Fact Versus Fiction & Its Perpetuation, 2nd edition. Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America, 1998.
Quarantelli EL (ed.): What is a Disaster? Perspectives on the Question. New York: Routledge, 1998.
Beres LR: Preventing the ultimate nightmare: nuclear terrorism against the US. Int J Intelligence Counter-Intelligence. 1997; 10(3): 333-342.
Christopher GW, Cieslak TJ, Pavlin JA, et al.: Biological warfare: A historical perspective. JAMA. 1997; 278(5): 412-417.
Holloway HC, Norwood AE, Fullerton, CS, et al.: The threat of biological weapons: Prophylaxis and mitigation of psychological and social consequences. JAMA. 1997; 278(5): 425-427.
Steinbruner JD: Biological weapons: A plague upon all houses. Foreign Policy. 1997; Winter: 85-96.
Zilinskas RA: Iraq’s biological weapons: The past as future? JAMA. 1997; 278(5): 418-427.
Betts RK: The new threat of mass destruction. Foreign Affairs. 1998; 77(1): 26-41.
Tucker D: Responding to terrorism. The Washington Quarterly. 1998; Winter: 103-117.
Friedman TL: Worried about ‘undeterrables.’ New York Times. 2002; September 18: E22.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright 2007-2023, Weston Medical Publishing, LLC and Journal of Emergency Management. All Rights Reserved