Behavioral and organizational responses to terrorism: A model based on 9/11

Authors

  • Henry W. Fischer III, PhD

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.2003.0032

Keywords:

-

Abstract

The author’s 1998 white paper (completed for the US Department of Defense as a result of Presidential Decision Directive 39) applied the research literature on behavioral and organizational response to outline what might occur in the aftermath of a terrorist attack. It argued that it presented the best model available and should be applied when developing mitigation, preparedness, and response plans in anticipation of possible domestic nuclear, biological, and chemical terrorism.
The terrorism events of September 11, 2001, have provided a basis for assessing this argument. The current article reviews the earlier argument by using updated disaster research to describe the behavioral and organizational response challenges a community or nation would likely encounter in a terrorist attack with weapons of mass destruction (WMD). Anecdotal evidence from the events of 9/11 is included to assess the efficacy of the literature as a model.

Author Biography

Henry W. Fischer III, PhD

Professor, Department of Sociology, Millersville University of Pennsylvania, Millersville, Pennsylvania.

References

Fischer HW: Behavioral response to chemical and biological terrorism. Falls Church, Virginia: White Paper, Research Planning, Inc., 1998.

Presidential Decision Directive 39, PDD-39: United States Policy on Counterterrorism. Washington, DC: The White House, 1995.

Fischer HW: Response to Disaster: Fact Versus Fiction & Its Perpetuation, 2nd edition. Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America, 1998.

Quarantelli EL (ed.): What is a Disaster? Perspectives on the Question. New York: Routledge, 1998.

Beres LR: Preventing the ultimate nightmare: nuclear terrorism against the US. Int J Intelligence Counter-Intelligence. 1997; 10(3): 333-342.

Christopher GW, Cieslak TJ, Pavlin JA, et al.: Biological warfare: A historical perspective. JAMA. 1997; 278(5): 412-417.

Holloway HC, Norwood AE, Fullerton, CS, et al.: The threat of biological weapons: Prophylaxis and mitigation of psychological and social consequences. JAMA. 1997; 278(5): 425-427.

Steinbruner JD: Biological weapons: A plague upon all houses. Foreign Policy. 1997; Winter: 85-96.

Zilinskas RA: Iraq’s biological weapons: The past as future? JAMA. 1997; 278(5): 418-427.

Betts RK: The new threat of mass destruction. Foreign Affairs. 1998; 77(1): 26-41.

Tucker D: Responding to terrorism. The Washington Quarterly. 1998; Winter: 103-117.

Friedman TL: Worried about ‘undeterrables.’ New York Times. 2002; September 18: E22.

Downloads

Published

10/01/2003

How to Cite

Fischer III, PhD, H. W. “Behavioral and Organizational Responses to Terrorism: A Model Based on 9/11”. Journal of Emergency Management, vol. 1, no. 3, Oct. 2003, pp. 42-48, doi:10.5055/jem.2003.0032.

Issue

Section

Articles