Potential contaminants in rainwater after a bushfire
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.2018.0367Keywords:
bushfires, rainwater, contaminants, potable use, stock watering, irrigationAbstract
Using roof harvested rainwater held in domestic rainwater tanks is a common practice in Australia, particularly in rural areas. This rainwater might become contaminated with ash and other contaminants during or after a bushfire. Current advice from Australian Health Departments can include the recommendation that landholders drain their tanks after a bushfire, which can cause additional distress to landholders who have already been through a traumatic event. This study created artificially contaminated water, spiked with chemicals likely to be associated with bushfires, including chromated copper arsenate-treated timber ash and firefighting foam to determine the possibility of contamination. The authors also tested two readily available filter systems and found that they removed some but not all contaminants. The artificially created contaminated water fell within guidelines for nonpotable uses such as irrigation and stock watering. This suggests that advice to landholders should be that tank water following a bushfire is likely to be safe for use for purposes apart from drinking. Landholders should be encouraged to retain and use their water for recovery purposes, but not for potable use.
References
Stewart RA, Sahin O, Siems R, et al.: Performance and economics of internally plumbed rainwater tanks: An Australian perspective. In Memon FA, Ward S (eds.): Alternative Water Supply Systems. Vol. 1. London: IWA Publishing, 2014: 3-23.
Coombes PJ, Smit M, Byrne J, et al.: Water resources, stormwater and waterway benefits of water conservation measures for Australian capital cities. Paper presented at: Proceedings of Conference Stormwater 2016, Stormwater Australia, Gold Coast, Qld, 2016.
Australian Bureau of Statistics: Source of Water and Its Uses, Environmental Issues: Water Use and Conservation. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2013.
EnHealth: Guidance on the Use of Rainwater Tanks. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia, 2010. Available at https://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/0D71DB86E9DA7CF1CA257BF0001CBF2F/$File/enhealth-raintank.pdf. Accessed April 4, 2018.
Spinks J, Phillips S, Robinson P, et al.: Bushfires and tank rainwater quality: A cause for concern? J Water Health. 2006; 4(1): 21-28.
Some non-heterocyclic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and some related exposures. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, No. 92. Available at http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol92/mono92.pdf. Accessed April 4, 2018.
Achten C, Andersson J: Overview of policyclic aromatic compounds. Polycycl Aromat Compd. 2015; 35: 1-10.
Wasson S, Linak W, Gullett B, et al.: Emissions of chromium, copper, arsenic, and PCDDs/Fs from open burning of CCA-treated wood. Environ Sci Technol. 2005; 39(22): 8865-8876.
NHMRC: Australian drinking water guidelines 6. Version 3.2. 2011. Available at https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/file/publications/nhmrc_adwg_6_february_2016.pdf. Accessed April 11, 2018.
Nowa Australia: Nowa Australia Pty Ltd protecting the protector. No date. Available at http://nowaaustralia.com.au/contents/en-us/d1.html. Accessed August 28, 2017.
SA Health: Bushfires and rainwater quality. 2012. Available at http://www.sahealth.sa.gov.au/wps/wcm/connect/public+content/sa+health+internet/protecting+public+health/bushfires/bushfires+and+rainwater+quality. Accessed April 11, 2018.
Department of Health & Human Services V: Bushfires and water tanks. 2017. Available at https://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/health/healthyliving/bushfires-and-water-tanks. Accessed April 11, 2018.
Department of Health: Rainwater tanks after a bushfire. No date. Available at http://www.healthywa.wa.gov.au/Articles/N_R/Rainwater-tanks-after-a-bushfire. Accessed April 11, 2018.
NSW Health Department: Rainwater tanks. 2016. Available at http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/households/rainwater-tanks.htm. Accessed April 11, 2018.
Sims RC, Overcash MR: Fate of polynuclear aromatic compounds (PNAs) in soil-plant systems. In Residue Reviews. New York, NY: Springer, 1983: 1-68.
American Petroleum Institute, RAaSA: Risk-Based Screening Levels for the Protection of Livestock Exposed to Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Petaluma, CA: American Petroleum Institute, RAaSA, 2004.
Prabhukumar G, Pagilla K: Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Urban Runoff–Sources, Sinks and Treatment: A Review. Chicago, IL: Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, 2010.
National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC): Guidelines for Managing Risks in Recreational Water. 2008. Available at https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/eh38.pdf. Accessed April 4, 2018.
Higgins S, Agouridis C, Gumbert A: Drinking Water Quality Guidelines for Cattle. Lexington: University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Service.
Canadian Council of Ministries of the Environment: Canadian Water Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Agricultural Water Uses. Winnipeg: Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, 1999.
Environmental Regulation Division Department of Environment and Conservation: Assessment levels for Soil, Sediment and Water. Bentley, WA: Environmental Regulation Division Department of Environment and Conservation 2010.
ANZECC, ARMCANZ: Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality. 2000. Available at http://www.agriculture.gov.au/SiteCollectionDocuments/water/nwqms-guidelines-4-vol1.pdf. Accessed April 4 2018.
Zimmerman A: Pinery fire recovery final report. 2017. Available at http://www.dcsi.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/57418/2015-Pinery-Fire-Recovery-Report.pdf. Accessed April 4 2018.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright 2007-2023, Weston Medical Publishing, LLC and Journal of Emergency Management. All Rights Reserved