The use of exercises to enhance and assess interlocal collaboration in preparedness: A qualitative analysis

Nicole A. Errett, PhD, MSPH, CPH, CE; Shannon Frattaroli, PhD, MPH; Daniel J. Barnett, MD, MPH; Beth A. Resnick, MPH; Lainie Rutkow, PhD, JD, MPH

doi:10.5055/jem.2015.0259

Authors

Nicole A. Errett, PhD, MSPH, CPH, CE
Shannon Frattaroli, PhD, MPH
Daniel J. Barnett, MD, MPH
Beth A. Resnick, MPH
Lainie Rutkow, PhD, JD, MPH

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.2015.0259

Keywords:

disaster planning, disasters, financing, Government

Abstract

Introduction: Interlocal collaboration, or collaboration among neighboring independent municipalities, has been generally accepted as an emergency preparedness strategy. In the absence of large-scale disasters, emergency preparedness exercises may serve to test the effectiveness of interlocal collaboration on emergency preparedness. However, the use of emergency preparedness exercises to enhance or assess interlocal collaboration, or its impact on preparedness, requires additional empirical exploration.

Hypothesis/problem: This exploratory study aims to understand the perspectives of key informants (KIs) with broad knowledge of the history, goals, and implementation of the Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) program, as well as knowledge of interlocal collaboration exercises conducted as part of the UASI program, about the role of exercises in improving and assessing interlocal collaboration for emergency preparedness.

Method: In early 2014, 28 KIs were interviewed during 24 semistructured interviews. Interviews were recorded and analyzed to identify key themes related to emergency preparedness exercises and the enhancement and assessment of interlocal collaboration.

Results: KIs perceived exercises to enhance interlocal collaboration in preparedness by promoting regional, interlocal: risk assessment; emergency plan testing and operationalization; relationship development; support for regional plans and operational structures; capability delivery practice; best practice sharing across interlocal collaborations; and engagement of elected or senior leadership in interlocal preparedness endeavors. Exercise participants, scenarios, administration, formats, and assessment strategies to promote interlocal collaboration were identified.

Conclusions: Seven distinct mechanisms by which exercises can enhance interlocal collaboration that can be used to guide future research and policy development were identified. The format, scenario, participation, and administration of emergency preparedness exercises can be tailored to enhance collaboration.

Author Biographies

Nicole A. Errett, PhD, MSPH, CPH, CE

Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland

Shannon Frattaroli, PhD, MPH

Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland

Daniel J. Barnett, MD, MPH

Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland

Beth A. Resnick, MPH

Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland

Lainie Rutkow, PhD, JD, MPH

Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland

References

Acosta J, Nelson C, Beckjord EB, et al.: A National Agenda for Public Health Systems Research on Emergency Preparedness. RAND Corporation Web site. 2009. Available at http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR660.html. Accessed June 19, 2014.

Federal Emergency Management Agency: Exercise. Federal Emergency Management Agency Web site. 2013. Available at www.fema.gov/exercise. Accessed June 19, 2014.

Agboola F, McCarthy T, Biddinger PD: Impact of emergency preparedness exercise on performance. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013; 19(suppl 2): S77-S83.

Salinsky E, Gursky EA: The case for transforming governmental public health. Health Aff (Millwood). 2006; 25(4): 1017-1028.

Waugh WL, Streib G: Collaboration and leadership for effective emergency management. Public Admin Rev. 2006: 66(s1): 131-140.

Federal Emergency Management Agency: Emergency Management Definition, Vision, Mission, Principles. Federal Emergency Management

Agency Web site. 2008. Available at https://training.fema.gov/hiedu/docs/emprinciples/0907_176%20em%20principles12x18v2f%20johnson%20(w-o%20draft).pdf. Accessed June 13, 2015.

Caruson K, MacManus S, Kohen M, et al.: Homeland security preparedness: The rebirth of regionalism. Publius J Federalism. 2005; 33(1): 143-168.

Stoto MA: Regionalization in local public health systems: Variation in rationale, implementation, and impact on public health preparedness. Public Health Rep. 2008; 123(4): 441-449.

Wetta-Hall R, Berg-Copas GM, Ablah E, et al.: Regionalization: Collateral benefits of emergency preparedness activities. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2007; 13(5): 469-475.

Jackson BA, Buehler JW, Cole D, et al.: Bioterrorism with zoonotic disease: Public health preparedness lessons from a multiagency exercise. Biosecur Bioterror. 2006; 4(3): 287-292.

Richter J, Livet M, Stewart J, et al.: Coastal terrorism: Using tabletop discussions to enhance coastal community infrastructure through relationship building. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2005; Suppl: S45-S49.

Ablah E, Nickels D, Hodle A, et al.: “Public health investigation”: A pilot, multi-county, electronic infectious disease exercise. Am J Infect Control. 2007; 35(6): 382-386.

Ablah E, Nickels D, Hodle A, et al.: Public health investigation: Focus group study of a regional infectious disease exercise. Public Health Nurs. 2008; 25(6): 546-553.

Edwards JC, Kang J, Silenas R: Promoting regional disaster preparedness among rural hospitals. J Rural Health. 2008; 24(3): 321-325.

Hegle J, Markiewicz M, Benson P, et al.: Lessons learned from North Carolina public health regional surveillance teams’ regional exercises. Biosecur Bioterror. 2011; 9(1): 41-47.

Federal Emergency Management Agency: FY 2012 Homeland Security Grant Program. Federal Emergency Management Agency Web site. 2014. Available at http://www.fema.gov/fy-2012-homeland-security-grant-program. Accessed April 23, 2014.

Federal Emergency Management Agency: FY 2013 Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP). Federal Emergency Management Agency Web site. 2014. Available at https://www.fema.gov/fy-2013-homeland-security-grant-program. Accessed April 23, 2014.

Federal Emergency Management Agency: FY 2014 Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP). Federal Emergency Management Agency Web site. 2014. Available at https://www.fema.gov/fy-2014-homeland-security-grant-program. Accessed April 23, 2014.

National Urban Area Security Initiative Association: A Report on the Effectiveness of the Urban Area Security Initiative Program. August 2011. Available at http://www.portlandoregon.gov/rdpo/article/455154. Accessed April 23, 2014.

US Government Accountability Office: FEMA Lacks Measures to Assess how Regional Collaboration Efforts Build Preparedness Capabilities GAO-09-651. July 2, 2009. Available at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d09651.pdf. Accessed April 23, 2014.

Yin RK: Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. New York, NY: The Guilford Press, 2011.

Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N: Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data. BMJ. 2000; 320(7227): 114-116.

Federal Emergency Management Agency: Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP), Volume 1: Overview and Exercise Program Management. February 2007. Available at http://montanadma.org/sites/default/files/HSEEP%20Volume%201.pdf. Accessed June 23, 2014.

Federal Emergency Management Agency: National Exercise Program. Federal Emergency Management Agency Web site. 2013. Available at http://www.fema.gov/national-exercise-program. Accessed June 23, 2014.

National Academy of Public Administration: Improving the National Preparedness System: Developing More Meaningful Grant Performance Measures. October 2011. Available at http://www.napawash.org/2011/1418-improving-the-national-preparednesssystem-developing-more-meaningful-grant-performance-measures.html. Accessed April 23, 2014.

World Association of Nuclear Operators: Peer Reviews: The Heart of WANO’s Many Programmes. WANO Web site. 2014. Available at http://www.wano.info/en-gb/programmes/peerreviews. Accessed June 23, 2014.

Hudson DW, Holzmueller CG, Pronovost PJ, et al.: Toward improving patient safety through voluntary peer-to-peer assessment. Am J Med Qual. 2010; 27(3): 201-209.

Hudson D, Paine L: Achieving excellence in patient safety: Getting beyond minimum acceptable standards through structured peer-to-peer review. Paper presented at Forum on Emerging Topics in Patient Safety, Johns Hopkins Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Baltimore, MD, September 2013.

Pronovost PJ, Hudson DW: Improving healthcare quality through organisational peer-to-peer assessment: Lessons from the nuclear power industry. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012; 21(10): 872-875.