The evolution of shortcomings in Incident Command System: Revisions have allowed critical management functions to atrophy

Authors

  • Kimberly S. Stambler, PhD, CEM
  • Joseph A. Barbera, MD

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.2015.0260

Keywords:

Incident Command System, long-range planning, Information Officer, ICS evolution, incident projection

Abstract

The original Incident Command System (ICS) was created through the federally funded Firefighting Resources of Southern California Organized for Potential Emergencies (FIRESCOPE) program. Initially developed as one element of multiagency coordination for managing severe wildfires, the FIRESCOPE ICS guidance was adopted and evolved through increasingly routine wildland firefighting. It then was modified for all hazards for the fire service. Only later, through the National Incident Management System (NIMS), was ICS officially adopted for all hazards and all responders. Over this multidecade evolution, the current NIMS ICS version became simplified in several key areas compared to the original, robust FIRESCOPE ICS. NIMS ICS is now promulgated as guidance for managing today's novel, complex, and lengthy disasters involving multidisciplinary response but experiences recurrent problems in key functions. This article examines the history of the subtle, yet critical differences in current ICS compared to the original system design, and focuses on information dissemination and intermediate, long-range and contingency planning. ICS transitions resulted in simplification and consolidation of positions and functions, without recognizing and maintaining critical position tasks necessary for managing complex, extended incidents.

Author Biographies

Kimberly S. Stambler, PhD, CEM

Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, George Washington University, Washington, DC

Joseph A. Barbera, MD

Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Institute for Crisis Disaster and Risk Management (ICDRM), George Washington University, Washington, DC

References

FIRESCOPE: Some Highlights of the Evolution of the Incident Command System as Developed by FIRESCOPE. California: California Office of Emergency Services, March 26, 2003. Available at http://firescope.org/firescope-history/Some%20Highlights%20of%20the%20Evolution%20of%20the%20ICS.pdf. Accessed July 14, 2014.

FIRESCOPE California: Incident Command System for Fire Department Structure Fire Operations (ICS-SF). California: FIRESCOPE, November 1, 1994. Available at http://www.firescope.org/ics-guides-and-terms/ICS%20SF.pdf. Accessed July 14, 2014.

Stambler K, Barbera J: Engineering the incident command and multiagency coordination systems. J Homeland Secur Emerg Manag. 2011; 8(1): Article 43.

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA): Course Curriculum – IS 100 Incident Command System. Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2008. Available at http://emilms.fema.gov/IS100A/ICS01summary.htm. Accessed February 19, 2009.

Irwin RL: The Incident Command System (ICS). In Auf der Heide E (ed.): Disaster Response: Principles for Preparation and Coordination. Maryland Heights, MO: C.V. Mosby Company, 1989: 133-163.

Lindell MK, Perry RW, Prater CS: Organizing response to disasters with the incident command system/incident management system. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Emergency Response and Rescue, Taipei, Republic of China, 2005.

Rowley DD: The Fires that Created an Incident Management System. 2005. Available at http://www.uninets.net/~dsrowley/The%20Fires%20that%20Created%20an%20IMS.pdf. Accessed November 13, 2010.

United States Forest Service: FIRESCOPE Program Report 1972-1982. 1982. Received a personal copy from Robert Irwin.

Chase RA: FIRESCOPE: A New Concept in Multiagency Fire Suppression Coordination. Berkeley, CA: US Forest Service Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experimentation Station, 1980.

Mission Research Corporation and System Development Corporation (MRC & SDC): A Conceptual Definition of a Wildland Fire Management Regional Coordination System. Emmitsburg, MD: Learning Resource Center, 1974: 3-12.

Department of Homeland Security (DHS): National Incident Management System. Department of Homeland Security, 2008: 52, 70. Available at http://www.fema.gov/emergency/nims/. Accessed April 3, 2012.

Mission Research Corporation (MRC): FIRESCOPE Field Command Operations System Conceptual Design Description: Volume II Operations Manual. Riverside, CA: Pacific Southwest Research Station, 1974.

FIRESCOPE: Incident Command System Operational System Description (ICS 120-1). California: FIRESCOPE, 1981: 4-5.

Department of Homeland Security (DHS): National Incident Management System. Department of Homeland Security, 2004: 16.

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA): Incident Action Planning Guide. 2012. Available at http://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/25028. Accessed May 4, 2013.

California Office of Emergency Services, Fire and Rescue Division: Field operations guide ICS 420-1. In Exemplary Practices in Emergency Management: The California FIRESCOPE Program (1987). California: California Office of Emergency Services, 1983: 117.

FIRESCOPE: Fire Service Field Operations Manual (ICS 420- 1). 2001. Available at http://feti.lsu.edu/municipal/NFA/TRADE/materials/TRADE%20CD%20XII/COTC/Chief%20Officer%20Training%20Curriculum-PDF%20Files/Field%20Operations%20Guide-ICS%20420-1/Complete%20Field%20Operations%20Guide-420-1.pdf. Accessed July 15, 2014.

Emergency Management Institute: Situation Unit Leader Course. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Management Institute, 2011.

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA): ICS Forms. 2013b. Available at http://training.fema.gov/EMIWeb/is/ICSResource/icsforms.htm. Accessed October 12, 2013.

Stambler: Intermediate and Long-Range Incident Action Planning for Complex and Extended Incidents [dissertation proposal]. Washington, DC: George Washington University, 2012.

Cutter SL, Burton CG, Emrich CT: Disaster resilience indicators for benchmarking baseline conditions. J Homeland Secur Emerg Manag. 2010; 7(1): Article 51.

NIMS Integration Center: NIMS and the Incident Command System. Department of Homeland Security, November 23, 2004: 56. Available at http://www.fema.gov/txt/nims/nims_ics_position_paper.txt. Accessed July 14, 2014.

Published

02/25/2016

How to Cite

Stambler, PhD, CEM, K. S., and J. A. Barbera, MD. “The Evolution of Shortcomings in Incident Command System: Revisions Have Allowed Critical Management Functions to Atrophy”. Journal of Emergency Management, vol. 13, no. 6, Feb. 2016, pp. 509-18, doi:10.5055/jem.2015.0260.