Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Perceiving the effects of scale on command and control: A conceptual metaphor approach

Tony McAleavy, BA (Hons), MSc, PhD

Abstract


Objective: This study investigates emergency manager’s perceptions of Command and Control to answer the question “how do emergency managers metaphorically interpret Command and Control?”

Design: An interpretivist paradigm, verbatim transcription, and content and linguistic metaphor analysis were used within this study.

Setting: Fifteen interviews per country, three per selected organization were conducted in the United Kingdom and the United States of America.

Subjects: Purposive sampling identified suitable participants from key organizations engaged in emergency management at local, subnational, and national levels.

Interventions: The study consisted of 30 semi-structured face-to-face interviews conducted within the work-place.

Main Outcome Measure(s): The inductive and qualitative nature of the study resulted in a 300,000-word corpus of data from which the two posited theories emerged.

Results: The UK Gold, Silver, Bronze model and the USA Incident Command System were considered tried and tested although they are conceptually misunderstood. Moreover, they are believed to be essential, scalable, and flexible. Able to manage the perceived chaos of increasing scales of disaster which contradicts the existing literature.

Conclusions: Two conceptual metaphors are theorized to create flexible learning tools that challenge the entrenched nature of these findings. Command and Control as a Candle demonstrates the effects of increasing disaster scale on systemic efficacy. Command and Control as a Golden Thread illustrates problems caused by time, distance, resource depletion, and infrastructure degradation. These tools engender deeper more critical perspectives by linking theory to practice through metaphor to engender perceptual change.

Keywords


emergency management, Command and Control, gold, silver and bronze, incident command system, disaster scale, interpretivism, organizations, metaphor

Full Text:

PDF

References


Dynes RR: Governmental systems for disaster management. Preliminary Paper No. 300. Newark, Delaware: Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware, 2000:1-10.

Adey P, Anderson B: Anticipating emergencies: Technologies of preparedness and the matter of security. Secur Dialogue. 2012; 43(2): 99-117.

Jensen J, Waugh WL: The United States’ experience with the incident command system: What we think we know and what we need to know more about. J Contingencies Crisis Manage. 2014; 22(1): 5-17.

McEntire DA: Disaster response and recovery: Strategy and tactics for resilience. 2nd ed. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley; 2015.

Dynes RR: Community emergency planning: False assumptions and inappropriate analogies. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 1994; 12(2): 141-158.

O’Leary R, Blomgren-Bingham L, eds.: The collaborative public manager: New ideas for the twenty first century. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press; 2009.

Moynihan DP: Leveraging collaborative networks in infrequent emergency situations. Networks and Partnerships Series, Washington DC: The IBM Centre for the Business of Government. 2005: 1-44.

Alberts DS, Hayes RE: Understanding command and control C31/command and control research program. 2006. C31/command and control research program. Washington DC: Department of Defence Command and Control Research Project. 2006.

Kapucu N: Examining the national response plan in response to a catastrophic disaster: Hurricane Katrina in 2005. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 2006; 24(2): 271-299.

McAleavy T, Rhisiart M: Harnessing the power of metaphor: Uncovering a hidden language of interoperability within the natural speech of emergency managers. Int J Emerg Manage. 2019; 15(1): 1-25.

H.M. Government: Civil contingencies act (2004)--part one: Local arrangements for civil protection. 2004. Available at http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/36/part/1. Accessed March 23rd, 2019.

H.M. Government: Responding to emergencies: The UK central government response concept of operations (CONOPS). 2013. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/192425/CONOPs_incl_revised_chapter_24_Apr-13.pdf. Accessed March 23, 2019.

Department of Homeland Security: The National Incident Management System, 3rd ed., 2017. Available at https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/1508151197225-ced8c60378c3936adb92c1a3ee6f6564/FINAL_NIMS_2017.pdf. Accessed 23 March, 2019.

Waugh WL, ed.: Shelter from the storm: Repairing the national emergency management system after hurricane Katrina. Thousand Oaks, California: American Academy of Political and Social Science; 2006.

Kerslake B: The Kerslake report: An independent review into the preparedness for, and response to, the Manchester arena attack on 22nd May 2017, 2018. Available at https://www.kerslakearenareview.co.uk/media/1022/kerslake_arena_review_printed_final.pdf. Accessed March 20, 2019.

Bissell R, ed.: Preparedness and response for catastrophic disasters. 1st ed. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 2013.

McAleavy T: Facing disaster with wide-area emergency preparedness. Resilience. 2010: 50-53.

Lawley J, Tompkins P: Learning metaphors. Soc Effective Affective Learning J. 2000. Available at http://www.cleanlanguage.co.uk/articles/articles/60/1/Learning-Metaphors/Page1.html. Accessed 8 November 2019

Lakoff G, Johnson M: Metaphors we live by. Digital ed. London, United Kingdom: University of Chicago Press; 2003.

Cornelissen JP, Kafouros M: Metaphors and theory building in organisation theory: What determines the impact of a metaphor on theory? Br J Manage. 2008; 19(4): 365-379.

Lawley J: Metaphors of organisation--Part 1. 2012. Available at http://www.cleanlanguage.co.uk/articles/articles/19/1/Metaphors-of-Organisation-part-1/Page1.html. Accessed November 27, 2018.

Barbosa-de-Oliveira A, Dias-da-Silva B: Modelling connections between linguistic constructions and conceptual metaphors. Santa Catarina BrasilSau Paulo, Brazil: Anais da V Conferencia Linguistica e Cognicao 2010. 2010:13-22.

Harries K: Afterthoughts on metaphor. Crit Inquiry. 1978; 5(1): 167-174.

Navarro MJ, Panopio JA, Bae Malayang D, et al.: Print media reportage of agricultural technology in the Philippines: A decade’s (2000-2009) analysis of news coverage and framing. J Sci Commun. 2011; 10(3): 1-12.

Billups FD: Exploring organizational culture through metaphor analysis. The NERA Res. 2011; 49(2): 22-23.

Tierney K, Bevc C, Kuligowski E: Metaphors matter: Disaster myths, media frames, and their consequences in hurricane Katrina. In Waugh WL (ed.): Shelter from the storm: Repairing the national emergency management system after hurricane Katrina. Los Angeles, California: Sage; 2006: 57-81.

Morgan G: Images of organisations. London: Sage Publications; 2007: 520.

Grant D, Oswick C: Metaphor and organizations. 1st ed. London: Sage; 1996.

Lang T: Systemizing the organizational scenario literature using Morgan’s metaphors. Acad Manage Proc. 2008; 8(1): 1-7.

Ortenblad A, Putnam Ll, Trehan K: Beyond Morgan’s eight metaphors: Adding to and developing organization theory. Hum Relat. 2016; 69(4): 287-889.

Morgan G: Commentary: Beyond Morgan’s eight metaphors. Hum Relat. 2016; 69(4): 1029-1042.

Tannenbaum R, Schmidt W: How to choose a leadership style. Harvard Bus Rev. 1973; 5(3): 162-180.

Alexander D: From civil defence to civil protection--and back again. Disaster Prev Manage. 2002; 11(3): 209-213.

Buck DA, Trainor JE, Aguirre B: A critical evaluation of the incident command system and NIMS. J Homeland Secur Emerg Manage. 2006; 3(3): 1-27.

Dynes RR, Quarantelli EL: Group behavior under stress: A required convergence of organizations and collective behavior perspectives. Columbia, Ohio: Disaster Research Center, Ohio State University; 1968.

Dynes RR: Problems in emergency planning. Energy. 1983; 8(8-9): 8-9.

Groenendaal J, Helsloot I, Scholtens A: A critical examination of the assumptions regarding centralized coordination in large-scale emergency situations. J Homeland Secur Emerg Manage. 2013; 10(1): 113-135.

Quarantelli EL: Letter to Dr O’leary: Here is a statement about the incident command system. Newark, Delaware: University of Delaware, Disaster Research Center, 2002.

Tierney KJ: The field turns fifty: Social change and the practice of disaster field work. 1998. Paper No. 273.

Schneider SK: Governmental response to disasters: The conflict between bureaucratic procedures and emergent norms. Public Adm Rev. 1992; 52(2): 135-145.

Groenendaal J, Helsloot I: A preliminary examination of command and control by incident commanders of Dutch fire services during real incidents. J Contingencies Crisis Manage. 2016; 24(1): 2-13.

Rake EL, Njσ O: Perceptions and performances of experienced incident commanders. J Risk Res. 2009; 12(5): 665-685.

Kapucu N: Collaborative emergency management: Better community organising, better preparedness and response. Disasters. 2008; 32(8): 239-262.

Rodriguez H, Trainor J, Quarantelli EL: Rising to the challenges of a catastrophe: The emergent and pro-social behavior following hurricane Katrina. Ann Am Acad Political Soc Sci. 2006; 604(1): 82-101.

Stallings RA, Quarantelli EL: Emergent citizen groups and emergency management. Public Adm Rev. 1985; 45: 100.

Moynihan DP: The network governance of crisis response: Case studies of incident command systems. J Public Adm Res Theory. 2009; 19(4): 895-915.

Dynes RR, Quarantelli EL: The role of civil defense in disaster planning. Columbus, Ohio: Disaster Research Center, The Ohio State University; 1975.

Dynes RR, Quarantelli EL, Kreps GA: A perspective on disaster planning, 1972. Report No. 11. Columbus, Ohio: Disaster Research Center; The Ohio State University.

Wenger D, Quarantelli EL, Dynes RR: Is the incident command system a plan for all seasons and emergency situations? Hazard Monthly. 1990; 10: 8-11.

Quarantelli EL: Disaster crisis management: A summary of research findings. J Manage Stud. 1988; 25(4): 373-385.

Quarantelli EL: Catastrophes are different from disasters: Some implications for crisis planning and managing drawn from hurricane Katrina. Newark, Delaware: Social Science Research Council, Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware; 2006. Available at http://understandingkatrina.ssrc.org/Quarantelli/. Accessed November 8, 2019.

Dynes RR: Models of emergency planning: Contributions from the social sciences, 1981. Available at http://www.eird.org/estrategias/pdf/eng/doc13423/doc13423-contenido.pdf. Accessed July 2, 2019.

Drabek TE: Managing the emergency response. Public Adm Rev. 1985; 45: 85-92.

Neal DM, Philips BD: Effective emergency management: Reconsidering the bureaucratic approach. Disasters. 1995; 19(4): 327-337.

Webb G: Flexibility in response to disasters: Past findings and future research needs. Disaster Research Center 50th Anniversary; Newark, Delaware: University of Delaware. 2014. 1-4.

Chang H: A literature review and analysis of the incident command system. Int J Emerg Manage. 2017; 13(1): 50-67.

Department of Homeland Security: The national response framework. 3rd ed. 2016. Available at https://www.fema.gov/medialibrary-data/1466014682982-9bcf8245ba4c60c120aa915abe74e15d/National_Response_Framework3rd.pdf. Accessed March 23, 2019.

CDRSS: Facing hazards and disasters: Understanding human dimensions--Committee on disaster research in the social sciences. Washington DC: National Academy of Sciences; 2006. Available at http://www.nehrp.gov/pdf/ACEHRDec2008_NRC.pdf. Accessed October 26, 2018.

Quarantelli EL: Disaster studies: An historical analysis of the influences of basic sociology and applied use on the research done in the last 35 years, 1986. Paper No. 111. Newark, Delaware: University of Delaware, Disaster Research Center.

Swope C, Patton Z: Disaster’s wake. Governing. 2005: 48-58.

Jensen J. NIMS in rural America. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 2009; 27(3): 218-249.

Fischer HW: The sociology of disaster: Definitions, research questions, and measurements continuation of the discussion in a post-September 11 environment. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 2003; 21(1): 91-107.

Gomez E, Plotnick L, Rohn E, et al.: Towards a unified public safety scale. Proceedings of Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, Hawaii. 2007.

Wachtendorf T, Brown B, Holguin-Veras J: Catastrophe characteristics and their impact on critical supply chains: Problematizing materiel convergence and management following hurricane Katrina. J Homeland Secur Emerg Manage. 2013; 10(2): 497-520.

Lauta KC. Disaster law. 1st ed. Abingdon, Oxon, United Kingdom: Routledge; 2015.

Lagadec E. Unconventional crises, unconventional responses: Reforming leadership in the age of catastrophic crises and hypercomplexity. 2015. Baltimore, Maryland: Center for Trans-Atlantic Relations, John Hopkins University; 2007.

Bryman A, Bell E: Business research methods. 4th ed. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2015.

Andrews M, Sclater SD, Squire C, et al.: Narrative research. In Seale C, Gobo G, eds. Qualitative research practice. London, United Kingdom: SAGE Publications; 2002: 97-112.

Currivan DB: Conversational interviewing methods. In Lavrakas PJ, ed. Encyclopaedia of survey research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications; 2008.

Chrzanaowska J: Qualitative market research, volume 2: Interviewing groups and individuals in qualitative market research. London: SAGE Publications; 2002.

Gill P, Stewart K, Treasure E, et al.: Methods of data collection in qualitative research: Interviews and focus groups. Br Dental J. 2008; 204(6): 429-432.

Mishler EG: Research interviewing: Context and narrative. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press; 1986.

Denscombe M: The good research guide for small-scale social research projects. 4th ed. Maidenhead, United Kingdom: McGraw-Hill; 2010.

van Teijlingen ER, Hundley V: The importance of pilot studies--social research update issue 35, 2001. Available at http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU35.html. Accessed March 23, 2019.

Halcomb EJ, Davidson PM: Is verbatim transcription of interview data always necessary? Appl Nurs Res. 2006; 19: 38-42.

Gibbs GR: Thematic coding and categorizing: Analyzing qualitative data. London: Sage Publications; 2007.

Steen GJ, Dorst AG, Herrmann JB, et al.: A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam, The Netherland: John Benjamin Publishing Company; 2010.

Lakoff G, Espenson J, Schwartz A: Master metaphor list. Available at http://araw.mede.uic.edu/~alansz/metaphor/METAPHORLIST.pdf. Updated 1991. Accessed November 8, 2019.

Glucksberg S: Understanding figurative language from metaphors to idioms. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2001.

Langer S. An introduction to symbolic logic. 3rd ed. New York: Dover Publications; 1967: 384.

Cornelissen JP, Kafouros M: The emergent organization: Primary and complex metaphors in theorizing about organizations. Organ Stud. 2008; 29(7): 957-978.

Jensen J, Youngs G: Explaining implementation behaviour of the national incident management system (NIMS). Disasters. 2015; 39(2): 362-388.

Waugh W: Katrina and the governors. Public Organ Rev. 2009; 9(4): 343-351.

Ionescu CM: The human respiratory system: An analysis of the interplay between anatomy, structure, breathing and fractal dynamics. Dordrecht, Belgium: Springer; 2013.

Scanlon TJ: Disaster’s little known prince: Canada’s Samuel Henry prince. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 1988; 6(3): 213-232.

Bigley GA, Roberts KH: The incident command system: High-reliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments. Acad Manage J. 2001; 44(6): 1281-1299.

Argyris C: Double-loop learning, teaching, and research. Acad Manage Learn Edu. 2002; 1(2): 206-218.

Halvorson A: Understanding the military: The institution, the culture, and the people. Rockville, Maryland: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2010.

Alexander D: Principles of emergency planning and management. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2002.

Wenger D, Quarantelli EL, Dynes RR: Disaster analysis: Police and fire departments--Final report on phase II for federal emergency management agency, 1989. Report No. 1. Newark, Delaware: University of Delaware, Disaster Research Center.

Perry RW: Incident management systems in disaster management. Disaster Prev Manage. 2003; 12(5): 405-412.

Kurokawa K: The national diet of japan: The official report of the Fukushima nuclear accident independent investigation commission. The National Diet of Japan, Tokoyo, Japan: Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission. 2012.

Pink S, ed.: Advances in visual methodology. 1st ed. London: Sage Publications; 2012.

Banks M, Zeitlyn D: Visual methods in social research. 2nd ed. London, United Kingdom: Sage Publications; 2015.

Christ CP. Candles in the dark. Available at http://feminismandreligion.com/2012/12/17/solstice-comes-but-once-a-year-by-carol-pchrist/candles-in-the-dark/. Updated 2012. Accessed June 6, 2017.

Cole D: The incident command system: A 25-year evaluation by California practitioners. Available at https://www.alnap.org/system/files/content/resource/files/main/efo31023.pdf. Updated 2000. Accessed November 8, 2019.

Waugh WL: Mechanisms for collaboration in emergency management: ICS, NIMS and the problems with command and control. In O’Leary R, Blomgren-Bingham L, eds. The collaborative public manager: New ideas for the twenty first century. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press; 2009: 157-175.

Jensen J, Thompson S: The incident command system: A literature review. Disasters. 2015; 40(1): 158-182.

Scholtens A, Jorritsma J, Helsloot I: On the need for a paradigm shift in the Dutch command and information system for the acute phase of disasters. J Contingencies Crisis Manage. 2014; 22(1): 39-51.

Leiner BM, Cerf VG, Clark DD, et al.: Brief history of the internet. https://www.internetsociety.org/internet/history-internet/brief-history-internet/. Updated 2017. Accessed November 8, 2019.

Deignan A: Metaphor and corpus linguistics. 1st ed. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company; 2005.

Atsma AJ: Moirae: The fates, Greek goddesses of fate and destiny. Available at http://www.theoi.com/Daimon/Moirai.html. Updated 2017. Accessed November 8, 2019.

Acharya DDB: The essence of Hinduism. 2nd ed. New Delhi, India: Prentice Hall; 2002.

Wilde S: The golden thread. Available at http://www.stuartwilde.com/2005/08/the-golden-thread/. Updated 2019. Accessed November 8, 2019.

Neal DM: Disaster science and emergency management. 2014. Disaster Research Center 50th Anniversary; Newark, Delaware: University of Delaware. 2014. 1-4.

Tierney KJ: From the margins to the mainstream? Disaster research at a crossroads. Ann Rev Sociol. 2007; 33: 503-525.

Grah B, Dimovski V, Peterlin J: A shift in perceiving organizational metaphors among business administration students in an EU county: A window into the current thinking of future employees. Drustvena Istrazivanja: Casopis Za Opca Drusvena Pitanja 2018; 27(1): 133-154.

Wilson JP, Gosiewska S: Multi-agency gold incident command training for civil emergencies. Disaster Prev Manage. 2014; 23(5): 632-648.

Barter N: Metaphors that facilitate organisational understanding: Reaching for the new and how machine and organism metaphors do not enable sustainable development, 2011; 10th Australasian Conference on Social and Environmental Accounting Research. Hobart, Australia: Launceston Campus, University of Tasmania.

McEntire DA: The status of emergency management theory: Issues, barriers, and recommendations for improved scholarship, 2004; Federal Emergency Management Agency Higher Education Conference; Emmitsburg, Maryland: Federal Emergency Management Agency.

Hinz O, ╓ztel H: Changing organisations with metaphors. Learn Organ. 2001; 8(4): 153-168. doi: 10.1108/09696470110397602.

Rubin CB: Long term recovery from disasters--The neglected component of emergency management. J Homeland Secur Emerg Manage. 2009; 6(4): 5.

Jensen J, Bundy S, Thomas S, et al.: The county emergency manager’s role in disaster recovery. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 2014; 32(1): 157-193.

Prince SH: Catastrophe and social change, based upon a sociological study of the Halifax disaster (Columbia University studies in the social sciences, no 212). New York: Ams PR; 1920.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.2020.0453

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Emergency Management