Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Disaster debris management best practice case studies

Julia Crowley, PhD

Abstract


Objective: To identify debris management best practices for planning and responding to debris-generating disaster events.

Methodology: Four best practice county case studies were selected through the responses of emergency management directors to an initial survey about debris management. Interviews were setup with the emergency management directors, and additional interviewees were identified through snowballing. Interviews were conducted, transcribed, and coded to identify six themes.

Results: The six themes that were identified through the coding include: debris management plans, challenges, collaboration, learning, communication, and debris operations. Case study interviewees identified their pre-event debris management plans as important for an effective and efficient debris management process. Interviewees also demonstrated a strong willingness to work together on debris management as well as an understanding of individual roles and responsibilities. Furthermore, interviewees address the concept of learning from past disaster events as a means of managing the uncertainty of disaster debris management.


Keywords


disaster debris management, learning from disaster, planning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Lorca A, Celik M, Ergun O, et al.: A decision-support tool for post-disaster debris operations. Procedia Eng. 2015; 107: 154-167.

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA): Public Assistance Debris Management Guide. Washington, DC: US Department of Homeland Security, 2007. FEMA-325.

Luther L: Disaster Debris Management: Requirements, Challenges, and Federal Agency Roles. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, 2017. Report No. R44941.

United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP): Managing Post-Disaster Debris: The Japan Experience. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), 2012.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): EPA Hurricane Maria Update, Friday January 5, 2018. Available at https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/epa-hurricane-maria-update-friday-january-5-2018. Accessed July 2, 2018.

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP): Time-Critical Debris Disposal and Management in Areas Affected by Typhoon Haiyan. New York, NY: United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), 2014.

Yepsen R: Generating biomass fuel from disaster debris. BioCycle. 2008; 49: 51.

Brown C, Milke M: Recycling disaster waste: Feasibility, method and effectiveness. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2016; 106: 21-32.

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA): A Guide to the Disaster Declaration Process and Federal Disaster Assistance. Washington, DC: US Department of Homeland Security, n.d.

Swan RC: Debris management planning for the 21st century. Nat Hazards Rev. 2000; 1: 222-225.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Planning for Natural Disaster Debris. Washington, DC: US EPA Office of Solid Waste, 2008.

Zawawi EMA, Yusof NS, Ismail Z: Adoption of post-disaster waste management plan into disaster management guidelines for Malaysia. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag. 2018; 20(1): 223-236.

Domingo N, Luo H: Canterbury earthquake construction and demolition waste management: Issues and improvement suggestions. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2017; 22: 130-138.

Mandrick J: Learning from disasters. Structure Magazine. November 2016. Available at https://www.structuremag.org/?p=10586. Accessed July 2, 2018.

International Recovery Platform (IRP): Learning from Disaster Recovery: Guidance for Decision Makers. Kobe, Japan: International Recovery Platform (IRP), 2007.

Crowley J: A measurement of the effectiveness and efficiency of predisaster debris management plans. Waste Manag. 2017; 62: 262-272.

Yin RK: Applications of Case Study Research. London: Sage Publications, 2003.

Perez-Nordvedt L, Kedia BL, Datta DK, et al.: Effectiveness and efficiency of cross-border knowledge transfer: An empirical examination. J Manag Stud. 2008; 45: 714-744.

Neā€™eman G, Jurgens A, Newstrom-Loyd L, et al.: A framework for comparing pollinator performance: Effectiveness and efficiency. Biol Rev. 2009; 84: 1-18.

Quade E: Analysis for Public Decisions. New York: American Elsevier, 1975.

Villanueva PS: Learning to ADAPT: Monitoring and evaluation approaches in climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction challenges, gaps and ways forward. Strengthening Climate Resilience. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies (IDS), 2010: 1-48.

Davis PS, Pett TL: Measuring organizational efficiency and effectiveness. J Manag Res. 2002; 2: 87-97.

Lockheed ME, Hanushek EA: Concepts of Educational Effectiveness and Efficiency. Washington, DC: World Bank, 1994. Report No. 12843.

Creswell JW: Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications, 2007. 25. Bailey CA: A Guide to Qualitative Field Research. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications, 2007.

Yin RK: Case Study Research Design and Methods. London: Sage Publications, 1984.

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA): Public assistance alternative procedures pilot program guide for debris removal (version 6.1). Available at https://www.fema.gov/media-librarydata/1531832460665-eefa838f818a3215e9480d71954a5ec9/PAAP_Debris_Guide_V6.1_6-28-2018_508.pdf. Accessed July 2, 2018.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.2020.0460

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Emergency Management