Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Reduction in unavailable-for-response episodes in a private emergency medical services agency

Brian L. Risavi, DO, MS, FACEP, FAAEM, Saad Mahmood, DO, Kevin Andryc, DO, John Libonati, EMT-P, Mark A. Terrell, EdD

Abstract


Objective: Increased demand for emergency medical services (EMS), financial constraints, emergency department overcrowding, EMS crews kept in hospital, all result in ambulance unavailability. This study seeks to identify daily temporal patterns for unavailable-for-response episodes, impact of increasing staffing during peak periods, and evaluating the extent of reduction in unavailable-for-response episodes due to temporally precise increases in staffing during critical time periods and the resulting cost/ benefit analysis.

Design: The authors evaluated all EMS responses during a 7-month time period and recorded all unavailable-for-response episodes. This identified clusters of unavailable-for-response episodes for which incremental staffing changes were implemented. Internal audit of cost/revenues was recorded.

Setting: Midsized private EMS agency in Northwest Pennsylvania.

Subjects/participants: EMS Responders/Agency calls.

Interventions: Temporally precise increases in staffing during critical time periods/unavailable-for-response episodes.

Main outcome measure(s): Reduction in unavailable-for-response episodes, cost effectiveness.

Results: Evaluating 23,833 EMS responses that occurred during the study period, staffing changes resulted in a 93 percent average reduction and 100 percent maximum reduction in unavailable-for-response episodes and were cost effective, based on evaluation of cost versus revenue, in this EMS agency.

Conclusions: Identification of opportunities for system staffing improvement in a midsized EMS agency demonstrated feasibility and usability of mapping temporal patterns of unavailable-for-response episodes to substantially reduce the number of unavailable-for-response episodes and was cost effective.


Keywords


EMS, quality improvement, response

Full Text:

PDF

References


Myers JB, Slovis CM, Eckstein M, et al.: Evidence-based performance measures for emergency medical services systems: A model for expanded EMS benchmarking. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2008; 12(2): 141-151.

Wang HE, Mann NC, Jacobson KE, et al.: National characteristics of emergency medical services responses in the United States. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2013; 17(1): 8-14.

Eckstein M, Isaacs SM, Slovis CM, et al.: Facilitating EMS turnaround intervals at hospitals in the face of receiving facility overcrowding. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2005; 9(3): 267-275.

Eckstein M, Chan LS: The effect of emergency department crowding on paramedic ambulance availability. Ann Emerg Med. 2004; 43(1): 100-105.

Campbell JP, Gratton MC, Salomone JA III, et al.: Ambulance arrival to patient contact: The hidden component of prehospital response time intervals. Ann Emerg Med. 1993; 22(8): 1254-1257.

Dean SF: Why the closest ambulance cannot be dispatched in an urban emergency medical services system. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008; 23(2): 161-165.

Thornes JE, Fisher PA, Rayment-Bishop T, et al.: Ambulance call-outs and response times in Birmingham and the impact of extreme weather and climate change. Emerg Med J. 2014; 31(3): 220-228.

Griffin R, McGwin G Jr: Emergency medical service providers’ experiences with traffic congestion. J Emerg Med. 2013; 44(2): 398-405.

Tanaka Y, Yamada H, Tamasaku S, et al.: The fast emergency vehicle pre-emption system improved the outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Am J Emerg Med. 2013; 31(10): 1466-1471.

Blanchard IE, Doig CJ, Hagel BE, et al.: Emergency medical services response time and mortality in an urban setting. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2012; 16(1): 142-151.

Weiss S, Fullerton L, Oglesbee S, et al.: Does ambulance response time influence patient condition among patients with specific medical and trauma emergencies? South Med J. 2013; 106(3): 230-235.

Peleg K, Pliskin JS: A geographic information system simulation model of EMS: Reducing ambulance response time. Am J Emerg Med. 2004; 22(3): 164-170.

Dean S: The origins of system status management. Emerg Med Serv. 2004; 33(6): 116-118.

Newgard CD, Schmicker RH, Hedges JR, et al.: Emergency medical services intervals and survival in trauma: Assessment of the “golden hour” in a North American prospective cohort. Ann Emerg Med. 2010; 55(3): 235-246.

Ahn KO, Shin SD, Cha WC, et al.: A model for the association of the call volume and the unavailable-for-response interval on the delayed ambulance response for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using a geographic information system. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010; 14(4): 469-476.

Buchmueller TC, Jacobson M, Wold C: How far to the hospital? The effect of hospital closures on access to care. J Health Econ. 2006; 25(4): 740-761.

Eisenberg MS, Bergner L, Hallstrom A: Cardiac resuscitation in the community. Importance of rapid provision and implications for program planning. JAMA. 1979; 241(18): 1905-1907.

Wilde ET: Do emergency medical system response times matter for health outcomes? Health Econ. 2013; 22(7): 790-806.

Pons PT, Markovchick VJ: Eight minutes or less: Does the ambulance response time guideline impact trauma patient outcome? J Emerg Med. 2002; 23(1): 43-48.

Pons PT, Haukoos JS, Bludworth W, et al.: Paramedic response time: Does it affect patient survival? Acad Emerg Med. 2005; 12(7): 594-600.

Blackwell TH, Kline JA, Willis JJ, et al.: Lack of association between prehospital response times and patient outcomes. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2009; 13(4): 444-450.

Swor RA, Cone DC: Emergency medical services advanced life support response times: Lots of heat, little light. Acad Emerg Med. 2002; 9(4): 320-321.

Blackwell TH, Kaufman JS: Response time effectiveness: comparison of response time and survival in an urban emergency medical services system. Acad Emerg Med. 2002; 9(4): 288-295.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.2016.0274

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Journal of Emergency Management