Planning for the storm: Considering renewable energy for critical infrastructure resilience
Keywords:resilience, disaster response, energy, renewable energy, critical infrastructure, emergency management
Objective: Benchmark the economic value of renewable energy and battery storage systems to extend operation of certain critical infrastructure facilities in different markets.
Design: This study uses the renewable energy optimization model to assess three critical facilities in North Carolina. Techno-economic results were then compared to analyses completed for critical facilities in California and New York to assess energy system cost effectiveness.
Results: Though solar photovoltaic (PV) arrays are cost-effective across each of the three North Carolina facilities, adopting battery storage to enable PV to operate with existing diesel generators in a hybrid energy system reduces the economic value of the system. This is in contrast to more economically viable systems in California and New York. All of these systems also offer unquantified resilience benefits by extending operation from hours to weeks across the facilities.
Conclusion: If decision makers were able to value the resilience benefits offered by each system or utility rate structures were changed to incentivize battery storage during normal operations, it would impact these assessments. Even so, this analysis provides decision makers a key set of cost benchmarks when considering how they might improve resilience at their critical operations.
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration): Billion-dollar weather and climate disasters: Overview. 2018. Available at https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/billions/. Accessed December 11, 2018.
Hotchkiss E: How solar PV can support disaster resiliency. Golden, Colorado: National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). 2015. Available at https://www.nrel.gov/state-local-tribal/blog/posts/how-solar-pv-can-support-disaster-resiliency.html. Accessed December 11, 2018.
Anderson K, Burman K, Simpkins T, et al.: New York Solar Smart DG Hub-Resilient Solar Project: Economic and Resiliency Impact of PV and Storage on New York Critical Infrastructure. Golden, Colorado: National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). 2016. Available at https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy16osti/66617.pdf. Accessed October 16, 2019.
Anderson K, DiOrio N, Cutler D, et al.: Increasing resiliency through renewable energy microgrids. J Energy Manage. 2017; 2(2): 22-40.
Hotchkiss E, Dane A, Komomua C: Resilience roadmap: A collaborative approach to multi-jurisdictional planning. Golden, Colorado: National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). Available at https://www.nrel.gov/resilience-planning-roadmap/. Accessed December 11, 2018.
Anderson K, Laws ND, Marr S, et al.: Quantifying and monetizing renewable energy resiliency. Sustainability. 2018; 10(4): 1-13. doi:10.3390/su10040933.
Lazard: Lazard’s levelized cost of energy analysis--Version 11.0. New York, 2017. Available at https://www.lazard.com/media/450337/lazardlevelized-cost-of-energy-version-110.pdf. Accessed October 16, 2019.
Laws N, Anderson K, Nicholas A, et al.: Valuing the resilience provided by solar and battery energy storage systems. Golden, Colorado: National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), 2018. Available at https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy18osti/70679.pdf. Accessed October 16, 2019.
Marqusee J, Schultz C, Robyn D: Power begins at home: Assured energy for U.S. Military Bases. Reston, Virginia: Noblis. 2017. Available at https://www.pewtrusts.org/~/media/assets/2017/01/ce_power_begins_at_home_assured_energy_for_us_military_bases.pdf. Accessed October 16, 2019.
Shivakumar A, Welsch M, Taliotis C, et al.: Valuing blackouts and lost leisure: Estimating electricity interruption costs for households across the European Union. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2017; 34: 39-48. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.010.
Schröder T, Kuckshinrichs W: Value of lost load: An efficient economic indicator for power supply security? A literature review. Front Energy Res. 2015; 3: 12. doi:/10.3389/fenrg.2015.00055/full
Coll-Mayor D, Pardo J, Perez-Donsion M: Methodology based on the value of lost load for evaluating economical losses due to disturbances in the power quality. Energy Policy. 2012; 50: 407-418. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.07.036.
de Nooij M, Koopmans C, Bijvoet C. The value of supply security: The costs of power interruptions: Economic input for damage reduction and investment in networks. Energy Econ. 2007; 29: 277-295. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2006.05.022.
Ghajar RF, Billinton R: Economic costs of power interruptions: a consistent model and methodology. Electr Power Energy Syst. 2006; 28: 29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2005.09.003.
Laws ND, Anderson K, DiOrio NA, et al.: Impacts of valuing resilience on cost-optimal PV and storage systems for commercial buildings. Renewable Energy. 2018; 127: 896-909. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.05.011.
Bustos C, Watts D. Novel methodology for microgrids in isolated communities: Electricity cost-coverage trade-off with 3-stage technology mix, dispatch and configuration optimizations. Appl Energy. 2017; 195: 204-221. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.024.
Ratha A: Value of lost load: How much is supply security worth? EEH--Power Systems Laboratory Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, 2012. Available at https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6672826. Accessed October 16, 2019.
Ratha A, Iggland E, Andersson G: Value of lost load: How much is supply security worth? 2013 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting. Vancouver, BC, Canada: IEEE, 2013. doi:10.1109/PESMG.2013.6672826.
McLaren J, Mullendore S: Identifying potential markets for behind-the-meter battery energy storage: A survey of U.S. Demand charges. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), 2017. Available at https://www.cleanegroup.org/wp-content/uploads/NREL_BatteryStorage_2017.pdf. Accessed October 16, 2019.
U.S. Energy Information Agency (EIA): Electric power monthly: Average Price of electricity to ultimate customers by end-use sector. 2018. Available at https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.php?t=epmt_5_6_a. Accessed December 11, 2018.
Chinoy S: The places in the U.S. Where disaster strikes again and again. New York Times. 2018. Available at https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/05/24/us/disasters-hurricanes-wildfires-storms.html. Accessed October 16, 2019.
Burton C: Hurricane Matthew floods in N.C. cause more than a billion in estimated damage. CBS News. 2016. Available at https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hurricane-matthew-floods-in-northcarolina-cause-more-than-a-billion-in-estimated-damage/. Accessed October 16, 2019.
Cutler D, Olis D, Elgqvist E, et al.: REopt: A platform for energy system integration and optimization. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), 2017. Available at https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy17osti/70022.pdf. Accessed October 16, 2019.
Yamegueu D, Azoumah Y, Py X, et al.: Experimental study of electricity generation by solar PV/diesel hybrid systems without battery storage for off-grid areas. Renewable Energy. 2011; 36(6): 1780-1787. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2010.11.011.
Roy A, Kulkarni GN: Analysis on the feasibility of a PV-diesel generator hybrid system without energy storage. Clean Technol Environ Policy. 2016; 18(8). doi: 10.1007/s10098-015-1070-2.
Elgqvist E, Anderson K, Settle E: Federal tax incentives for energy storage systems. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), 2018. Available at https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy18osti/70384.pdf. Accessed October 16, 2019.
Anderson D, Eberle A, Edmunds T, et al.: Grid modernization: Metrics analysis (GMLC1.1), Version 2.1. Grid Modernization Laboratory Consortium, U.S. Department of Energy, 2017. Available at https://gridmod.labworks.org/sites/default/files/resources/GMLC1%201_Reference_Manual_2%201_final_2017_06_01_v4_wPNNLNo_1.pdf.
How to Cite
Copyright 2007-2023, Weston Medical Publishing, LLC and Journal of Emergency Management. All Rights Reserved