Restoration versus transformative adaptation of community drinking water systems after Hurricanes Irma and Maria in Puerto Rico




critical infrastructure, resiliency, impoverished communities, Puerto Rico, transformative adaptation, drinking community water systems


Hurricane Irma then Maria hit Puerto Rico in September 2017, exposing the heightened vulnerability of the island’s Critical Infrastructure Systems and Processes (CRISPs) and putting the resilience of some of the most impoverished communities to the test. Being one of these CRISPs, the island’s centralized drinking water system operated by the Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority suffered heavy damage leaving over 200,000 people off-grid for months. Decentralized community aqueducts were also affected. However, most were able to sustain operations, with only 15 percent incapacitated during the first few weeks after Maria.

Of the 205 community aqueducts serving low-income communities in the island’s central mountainous areas, only 35 failed. This article explores how and why these systems failed and what actions the communities should take to recover in a relatively short time in comparison to the centralized system. It defines the factors that account for the differences, the systems’ capacity to meet water quality requirements, and potentially transformative adaptations generated to face future disturbances. We were interested in understanding (a) how system capacity was affected by the restoration process, (b) if adaptation resulted in significant operational changes, and (c) community member engagement. Finally, we explored governance transformations that increased stakeholder’s participation, including community aqueducts representatives in decision-making and policy-making.

Data collection included interviews with water system managers, government, and nongovernmental organization (NGO) representatives who regulate these systems or assisted communities in recovering their systems. We also surveyed water systems that had operational problems within the first 3 weeks. The data revealed a diversity of actions along the disaster cycle through which communities prepared for, restored, recovered, and cocreated transformative adaptations to their systems. Findings reflect that despite economic deficiencies and lack of emergency plans, many communities were able to improvise and restore their water systems soon after the disaster. As part of their post-disaster organization, communities increased their collaborative networks with governmental and NGOs to cocreate improvement projects to enhance resiliency. Adaptations included (1) increased community autonomy, (2) system redundancy, and (3) improved capacity to participate in government discussion forums related to their systems.

Author Biographies

Victor Dionel Ruiz-Aviles, PhD Student

School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona

David Pijawka

Professor Emeritus, School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona; School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona

David Manuel-Navarrete

Associate Professor, Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona

Dave White

Deputy Director, Global Institute of Sustainability and Innovation, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona; Professor, School of Community Resources Development, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona

Cecilio Ortiz Garcia

Chair of the Public Affairs and Security Studies Department, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, Texas


Caldera-Ortiz L: Historia de los ciclones y huracanes tropicales en Puerto Rico [History of tropical cyclones and hurricanes in Puerto Rico]. Editorial El Aguey. 2017; 2: 177-193.

Lloréns H, Stanchich M: Water is life, but the colony is a necropolis: Environmental terrains of struggle in Puerto Rico. Cult Dyn. 2019; 31(1-2): 81-101. DOI: 10.1177/0921374019826200.

Hora P: Bajito el embalse guajataca que suple a 200,000 personas [Under the Guajataca reservoir that supplies 200,000 people]. Primera Hora. 2019. Available at Accessed September 12, 2019.

Lonsdale K, Pringle P, Turner B: Transformational Adaptation: What It is, Why It Matters and What is Needed. UK Climate Impacts Programme. Oxford: University of Oxford, 2015.

Ríos R: La autoridad de acueductos y alcantarillados (AAA): historia de una catástrofe [The aqueduct and sewer authority (AAA): history of a catastrophe]. Revista Adm Publica. 2018; 49: 87-94.

Alicea-Martinez A, Rios R: Vulnerability assessment of small community water systems in Puerto Rico. Interdiscipl Environ Rev. 2016; 17(2): 132-148.

Manuel-Navarrete D, Pelling M: Subjectivity and the politics of transformation in response to development and environmental change. Global Environ Change. 2015; 35: 558-569. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.08.012.

Environmental Protection Agency: Agua potable: La EPA necesita adoptar medidas adicionales Para garantizar que los pequeños sistemas de agua comunitarios señalados como graves infractores logren cumplir con las normas [Drinking water: EPA needs to take additional steps to ensure small community water systems designated as serious violators achieve compliance]. 2016.

Pérez-Lugo M, Ortiz-García C, Ruiz-Avilés V, et al.: Identificación de Recursos Energéticos Renovables Para Acueductos Comunitarios Sostenible [Identification of Renewable Energy Resources for Sustainable Community Aqueducts]. Instituto Nacional de Energía y Sostenibilidad Isleña, 2016.

Moncada J, Perez C, Medellín VG: Comunidades organizadas y el servicio público de agua potable en Colombia: Una defense de la tercera opción económica desde la teoría de recursos de uso común [Organized communities and potable water public utilities in Colombia: Advocacy for the third economic option based on the common- pool resources theory]. Ecos de Economía. 2013; 37(17): 125-159.

World Health Organization: WHO Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality. Geneva: WHO Press, 2008. DOI: 10.1248/jhs1956.35.307.

Ramos R: Acueductos comunitarios sostenibles de Puerto Rico y las alianzas públicas comunitarias [Sustainable community aqueducts of Puerto Rico and community public alliances]. UN-Water Annual International Zaragoza Conference, 2015.

Law 239-1998: Para enmendar la “Ley para la Conservación, el Desarrollo y Usos de los Recursos de Agua de Puerto Rico.” [To amend the “Law for the Conservation, Development and Uses of Water Resources of Puerto Rico”]. August 13, 1998.

Law 193-1997: Adicionar y enmendar la Ley para Proteger la Pureza de las Aguas Potables de P.R., ley 5, 1977 [Add and amend the law to protect the Purity of Drinking Waters of P.R., law 5, 1977]. December 26, 1997.

Southwick SM, Bonanno GA, Masten AS, et al.: Resilience definitions, theory, and challenges: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2014; 5: 25338. DOI: 10.3402/ejpt.v5.25338.

Meerow S, Newell JP, Stults M: Defining urban resilience: A review. Landsc Urban Plann. 2016; 147: 38-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011.

Torres H, Alsharif K: What it means to become “‘more resilient’”: An analysis of local resilience-building approaches in three Florida communities. Weather Clim Soc. 2017; 9(3): 405-419. DOI: 10.1175/WCAS-D-16-0101.1.

Wilson G: Community Resilience and Environmental Transitions. New York: Routledge, 2012.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine: Building and measuring community resilience: Actions for communities and the gulf research program (Chapter 4). In Evaluation of Existing Resilience Measurement Efforts. Engineering and Medicine National Academies of Sciences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2019: 21-46.

Environmental Protection Agency: Rural and Small Systems Guidebook to Sustainable Utility Management. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency, 2019.

Manuel-Navarrete D, Pelling M, Redclift M: Critical adaptation to hurricanes in the Mexican Caribbean: Development visions, governance structures, and coping strategies. Global Environ Change. 2011; 21: 249-258. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.009.

Hagen B: Understanding climate risk: Mitigation, adaptation, and resiliency. In Hagen B, Pijawka D (eds.): Sustainability for the 21st Century: Pathways, Programs, and Policies. 2nd ed. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt, 2017: 145-172.

Buckman S, Resilience RN: An innovative approach to social, environmental, and economic urban uncertainty (Chapter 7). In Hagen B, Pijawka D (eds.): Sustainability for the 21st Century: Pathways, Programs, and Policies. 2nd ed. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt, 2017: 127-144.

Bhamra R, Dani S, Burnard K: Resilience: The concept, a literature review and future directions. Int J Prod Res. 2011; 49: 5375-5393.

Tierney K, Bruneau M: Conceptualizing and measuring resilience: A key to disaster loss reduction. All-Hazards, Preparedness, Response and Recovery. TR News: 250, 2017.

Masterson J, Peacock W, Zandt S, et al.: Planning for Community Resilience: A Handbook for Reducing Vulnerability to Disasters. Washington: Island Press, 2014.

Kates RW, Colten CE, Laska S, et al.: Reconstruction of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina: A research perspective. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006; 103(40): 14653-14660. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0605726103.

National Research Council: Facing hazards and disasters: Understanding human dimensions (Chapter 4). In Research on Disaster Response and Recovery. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2006.

Engle NL: The role of drought preparedness in building and mobilizing adaptive capacity in states and their community water systems. Clim Change. 2013; 118: 291-306. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-012-0657-4.

Perry RW, Lindell MK: Preparedness for emergency response: Guidelines for the emergency planning process. Disasters. 2003; 27(4): 336-350. DOI: 10.1111/j.0361-3666.2003.00237.x.

Glantz MH, Ramírez IJ: Improvisation in the time of disaster. Environ Sci Policy Sustain Dev. 2018; 60(5): 4-17. DOI: 10.1080/00139157.2018.1495496.

Lemos MC, Manuel-Navarrete D, Willems BL, et al.: Advancing metrics: Models for understanding adaptive capacity and water security. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 2016; 21: 52-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.11.004.

Kates R, Pijawka D: From rubble to monument: The pace of reconstruction. In Hass J, Kates R, Bowden M (eds.): Disaster and Reconstruction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1977: 1-23.

Preston BL, Dow K, Berkhout F: The climate adaptation frontier. Sustainability. 2013; 5(3): 1011-1035. DOI: 10.3390/su5031011.

Bealt J, Mansouri SA: From disaster to development: A systematic review of community-driven humanitarian logistics. Disasters. 2018; 42(1): 124-148. DOI: 10.1111/disa.12232.

Chen J, Hsuan T, Chen Y, et al.: Public–private partnerships for the development of disaster resilient communities. J Contingen Crisis Man. 2013; 21(3): 130-143. DOI: 10.1111/1468-5973.12021.

Speranza CI, Wiesmann U, Rist S: An indicator framework for assessing livelihood resilience in the context of social–ecological dynamics. Glob Environ Chang. 2014; 28: 109-119. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.005.

Benach J, Díaz M, Muñoz N, et al.: What the Puerto Rican hurricanes make visible: Chronicle of a public health disaster foretold. Soc Sci Med. 2019; 238: 112367.

Gonçalves P, Moshtari M: Collaborative initiatives among international actors within a humanitarian setting. Hanken school of economics. Int J Netw Virtual Organ. 2016; 16(4). DOI: 10.1504/IJNVO.2016.10002511.

Siemen C, Dos Santos Rocha R, Van Den Berg RP, et al.: Collaboration among humanitarian relief organizations and volunteer technical communities: Identifying research opportunities and challenges through a systematic literature review. In Proceedings of the International ISCRAM Conference. 2017: 1043-1054.

Yin R: Designing case studies. Identifying your case(s) and establishing the logic of your case study. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. 6th ed. Los Angeles: Sage, 2017: 201-202.

Bernard H, Wutich A, Ryan G: Analyzing Qualitative Data: Systematic Approaches. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: Sage, 2017.

The American Association for Public Opinion Research: Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. 9th ed. The American Association for Public Opinion Research, 2016. DOI: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2501_2.

Sigfredo P, Quiñones F: Resumen de La geología de Puerto Rico [Summary of The Geology of Puerto Rico]. 2003. Available at Accessed December 28, 2020.

Luh J, Royster S, Sebastian D, et al.: Expert assessment of the resilience of drinking water and sanitation systems to climate-related hazards. Sci Total Environ. 2017; 592: 334-344. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.084.

Federal Emergency Management Administration [FEMA]: The water coalition: A multisectoral effort to support community aqueducts in Puerto Rico. 2019. Available at Accessed March 6, 2021.

Ohle N: Puerto Rico: The overlooked communities and their struggle for safe drinking water. 2018. Available at Accessed March 6, 2021.

Becoña E: Resiliencia: Definición, Características y Utilidad del Concepto [Resilience: Definition, Characteristics and Utility of the Concept]. Revista Psicopatol Psicol Clín. 2006; 11(3): 125-146.