Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Exploring frames of environmental crises on Twitter and Weibo: Crisis communication about Hurricane Maria and haze

Xianlin Jin, PhD

Abstract


There is limited knowledge about how crises are framed on different social media platforms specifically in a non-Western cultural context. This study compares how extreme environmental crises—Hurricane Maria and haze—were framed on Twitter and Weibo. Through word-cloud, co-occurrence, and thematic analyses with Hurricane Maria-related tweets, this study identified two major frames of this crisis: a disaster frame and a political frame. Similarly, by analyzing haze-related posts on Sina Weibo, two major frames emerged: an environmental frame and a health frame. Both crises were largely framed as environmental issues rather than health risks or crises. Such framing helps shape the existence of Hurricane Maria and haze as legitimate facts. The findings also reveal that cultural variances, eg, power distance, collectivist-individualist culture, and uncertainty avoidance, impact crisis framing. This study indicates the importance of designing culture-fit messages and incorporating social media strategies in crisis communication while developing emergency management plans and adds knowledge to the limited literature on social-mediated crisis communication in different cultural contexts. Such knowledge will provide theoretical and practical implications for crisis scholars, emergency management practitioners, and policymakers.


Keywords


framing, social-mediated crisis communication, comparative approach, Hurricane Maria, haze

Full Text:

PDF

References


Spence PR, Lachlan KA, Lin X, et al.: Variability in Twitter content across the stages of a natural disaster: Implications for crisis communication. Commun Q. 2015; 63(2): 171-186. DOI: 10.1080/01463373.2015.1012219.

Goffman E: Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1974.

Entman RM: Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. J Commun. 1993; 43(4): 51-58. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.

Entman RM: Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and US Foreign Policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2004.

Entman RM, Matthes J, Pellicano L: Nature, sources, and effects of news framing. In Wahl-Jorgensen K, Hanitzsch T (eds.): The Handbook of Journalism Studies. New York: Routledge, 2009: 175-190.

Fauconnier G, Sweetser E: Cognitive links and domains: Basic aspects of mental space theory. In Fauconnier G, Sweetser E (eds.): Space, Worlds, and Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996: 1-28.

Coombs WT: Ongoing Crisis Communication: Planning, Managing, and Responding. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2014.

Ulmer RR, Sellnow TL, Seeger MW: Effective Crisis Communication: Moving from Crisis to Opportunity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2017.

Kim Y: Understanding publics’ perception and behaviors in crisis communication: Effects of crisis news framing and publics’ acquisition, selection, and transmission of information in crisis situations. J Public Relations Res. 2016; 28(1): 35-50. DOI: 10.1080/1062726X.2015.1131697.

Pompper D: Framing the public policy issue of environmental risk, 1983–1997 [doctoral dissertation. Order No. 3014469]. Ann Arbor: Temple University, 2001.

Shah DV, McLeod DM, Rojas H, et al.: Revising the communication mediation model for a new political communication ecology. Hum Commun Res. 2017; 43(4): 491-504. DOI: 10.1111/hcre.12115.

Getchell MC, Sellnow TL: Engaging stakeholders through social media and emergent organizations: The West Virginia water crisis recovery as a case study. J Emerg Manag. 2019; 17(4): 321-333. DOI: 10.5055/jem.2019.0429.

Jin X: Exploring crisis communication and information dissemination on social media: Social network analysis of Hurricane Irma tweets. J Int Crisis Risk Commun Res. 2020; 3(2): 179-210. DOI: 10.30658/jicrcr.3.2.3.

Morris MR, Teevan J, Panovich K: A comparison of information seeking using search engines and social media. Washington, DC: In Proceedings of the 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 2010.

Lachlan KA, Spence PR, Lin X, et al.: Screaming into the wind: Examining the volume and content of tweets associated with hurricane sandy. Commun Stud. 2014; 65(5): 500-518. DOI: 10.1080/10510974.2014.956941.

Matheson D: The performance of publicness in social media: Tracing patterns in tweets after a disaster. Media Cult Soc. 2018; 40(4): 584-599. DOI: 10.1177/0163443717741356.

Burke J, Spence PR, Lachlan KA: Crisis preparation, media use, and information seeking during hurricane Ike: Lessons learned for emergency communication. J Emerg Manag. 2010; 8: 27-37. DOI: 10.5055/jem.2010.0030.

Fogarty BA: “We Are Forgotten.” Framing disaster via Twitter in the aftermath of Hurricane Maria: Implications for social work policy practice [doctoral dissertation]: Social work. Kutztown University, 2020. Available at https://research.library.kutztown.edu/socialworkdissertations/11.

Takahashi B, Tandoc EC Jr, Carmichael C: Communicating on Twitter during a disaster: An analysis of tweets during Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines. Comput Hum Behav. 2015; 50(50): 392-398. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.020.

Lin X, Lachlan KA, Spence PR: Exploring extreme events on social media: A comparison of user reposting/retweeting behaviors on Twitter and Weibo. Comput Hum Behav. 2016; 65: 576-581. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.032.

Cheng Y: Online social media and crisis communication in China: A review and critique In Servaes J (ed.): Handbook of Communication for Development and Social Change. Singapore: Springer, 2018: 1-14. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-7035-8_5-1.

Taylor M: Cultural variance as a challenge to global public relations: A case study of the Coca-Cola scare in Europe. Public Relations Rev. 2000; 26(3): 277-293. DOI: 10.1016/s0363-8111(00)00048-5.

Coombs WT: Crisis communication and image repair discourse. In Hansen-Horn TL, Neff BD (eds.): Public Relations: From Theory to Practice. Boston, MA: Pearson Allyn & Bacon, 2008: 262-280.

Jin X, O’Hair HD: Air pollution and health in China. In O’Hair HD, O’Hair MJ (eds.): The Handbook of Applied Communication Research. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2020: 935-954. DOI: 10.1002/9781119399926.ch51.

Chen Y, Ebenstein A, Greenstone M, et al.: Evidence on the impact of sustained exposure to air pollution on life expectancy from China’s Huai River policy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013; 110(32): 12936-12941. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1300018110.

Pope CA, Dockery DW: Air pollution and life expectancy in China and beyond. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013; 110(32): 12861-12862. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1310925110.

Sayers EL, Parker AM, Ramchand R, et al.: Reaching vulnerable populations in the disaster-prone US Gulf Coast: Communicating across the crisis lifecycle. J Emerg Manag. 2019; 17(4): 271-286. DOI: 10.5055/jem.2019.0426.

Jin X, Spence PR: Understanding crisis communication on social media with CERC: Topic model analysis of tweets about Hurricane Maria. J Risk Res. 2020: 1-22. DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2020.1848901.

Barboza D: Chinese to release more data on air pollution in Beijing. The New York Times. 2012. Available at http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/07/world/asia/china-to-release-more-data-onair-pollution-in-beijing.html. Accessed April 10, 2018.

Sandman PM, Miller PM, Johnson BB, et al.: Agency communication, community outrage, and perception of risk: Three simulation experiments. Risk Anal. 1993; 13(6): 585-598. DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb01321.x.

Hurricane Maria advisory archive. 2017. Available at http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2017/MARIA.shtml?.

Fink S: Nearly a year after Hurricane Maria, Puerto Rico revises death toll to 2,975. The New York Times. 2018. Available at https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/28/us/puerto-rico-hurricane-maria-deaths.html. Accessed November 1, 2019.

Smith M, Ceni A, Milic-Frayling N, et al.: NodeXL: A free and open network overview, discovery and exploration add-in for Excel 2007/2010/2013/2016, from the Social Media Research Foundation. 2010. Available at https://www.smrfoundation.org. Accessed March 29, 2021.

Fu K, Chan C, Chau M: Assessing censorship on microblogs in China: Discriminatory keyword analysis and the real-name registration policy. IEEE Internet Comput. 2013; 17(3): 42-50. DOI: 10.1109/MIC.2013.28.

US Department of State Mission China Beijing: US Department of State air quality monitoring program. State Air: Beijing_2012_HourlyPM2.5_created20140325.csv. 2012. Available at http://www.stateair.net/web/historical/1/1.html.

Strauss ALC, Corbin JM: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998.

Braun V, Clarke V: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006; 3(2): 77-101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: CERC introduction. 2018. Available at https://emergency.cdc.gov/cerc/ppt/CERC_Introduction.pdf. Accessed November 1, 2019.

de Mooij M, Hofstede G: The hofstede model. Int J Advert. 2010; 29(1): 85-110. DOI: 10.2501/S026504870920104X.

Gudykunst WB: Cultural variability in communication: An introduction. Commun Res. 1997; 24(4): 327-348. DOI: 10.1177/009365097024004001.

Hofstede G: Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1984.

Lachlan K, Spence PR: Communicating risks: Examining hazard and outrage in multiple contexts: Communicating risks. Risk Anal. 2010; 30(12): 1872-1886. DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01511.x.

Spence P, Nelson L, Lachlan K: Psychological responses and coping strategies after an urban bridge collapse. Traumatology. 2010; 16(1): 7-15. DOI: 10.1177/1534765609347544.

Coombs WT, Holladay JS: The paracrisis: The challenges created by publicly managing crisis prevention. Public Relations Rev. 2012; 38(3): 408-415. DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.04.004.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Emergency Management