Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Crisis management made visible: A case study of a school fire

Erna Danielsson, PhD

Abstract


The aim of this study was to examine how a more inclusive framing of a crisis directs the actors’ understanding of a situation and identifies unrecognized actors in the crisis management process. Crises include various extreme situations and require appropriate management frameworks to be effectively managed. The research is based on interviews with personnel who responded to a school fire and focuses on their interpretations and actions during the incident. The results indicated that the informants framed the crisis as a school fire. Consequently, the incident commander and principal became the core actors. However, an unrecognized management frame was identified, representing teachers who, in response to the crisis, upheld and normalized educational functions. As the frame representing teachers did not fit the established discourse on crisis management, it was not recognized by others involved, hence ignoring the contributions of significant role-players in the operational and pedagogical management of the crisis.


Keywords


crisis management, school fire, management frameworks, pedagogical management, unrecognized actors

Full Text:

PDF

References


Comfort LK, Kapucu N: Inter-organizational coordination in extreme events: The World Trade Center attacks, September 11, 2001. Nat Hazards. 2006; 39(2): 309-327.

Kapucu N, Arslan T, Demiroz F: Collaborative emergency management and national emergency management network. Disaster Prev Manag. 2010; 19(4): 452-468.

Thomalla F, Schmuck H: We all knew that a cyclone was coming: Disaster preparedness and the cyclone of 1999 in Orissa. Disasters. 2004; 28(4): 373-387.

Cornelissen JP, Werner MD: Putting framing in perspective: A review of framing and frame analysis across the management and organizational literature. Acad Manag Annal. 2014; 8(1): 181-235.

Weick KE: Enacted sensemaking in a crisis situation. J Manag Stud. 1988; 25(4): 305-317.

Weick KE: Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995.

Bergeron CD, Cooren F: The collective framing of crisis management: A ventriloqual analysis of emergency operations centres. J Contingencies Crisis Manag. 2012; 20(3): 120-137.

Kvarnlöf L, Johansson R: Boundary practices at incident sites: Making distinctions between emergency personnel and the public. Int J Emerg Serv. 2014; 3(1): 65-76.

Oscarsson O: Boundary work to conduct business as usual: Interaction at the boundary between the affected organization and emergency responders. Risk Hazard Crisis Public Pol. 2019; 10(2): 212-232.

Johansson R, Danielsson E, Kvarnlöf L, et al.: At the external boundary of a disaster response operation: The dynamics of volunteer inclusion. J Contingencies Crisis Manag. 2018; 26(4): 519-529.

Kvarnlöf L: Först på plats: Gränsdragningar, positioneringar och emergens i berättelser från olycksplatsen [Citizen first responders: Boundaries, positioning and emergence in stories from the scene of the accident]. [Diss.]. Östersund: Mid Sweden University, 2015.

Nilsson S, Alvinius A, Enander A: Frames of public reactions in crisis. J Contingencies Crisis Manag. 2016; 24(1): 14-26.

Eiser RJ, Bostrom A, Burton I, et al.: Risk interpretation and action: A conceptual framework for responses to natural hazards. Int J Disas Risk Reduct. 2012; 1: 5-16.

Bird DK, Gísladóttir GG: Residents’ attitudes and behavior before and after the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruptions—A case study from Southern Iceland. Bull Volcanol. 2012; 74(6): 1263-1279.

Danielsson E: Following routines: A challenge in cross-sectorial collaboration. J Contingencies Crisis Manag. 2016; 24(1): 36-45.

Helsloot I, Ruitenberg A: Citizen response to disasters: A survey of literature and some practical implications. J Contingencies Crisis Manag. 2004; 12(3): 98-111.

Kendra JM, Wachtendorf T, Quarantelli EL: The evacuation of lower Manhattan by water transport on September 11: An unplanned success. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2003; 29: 316-318.

Dynes RR: Community emergency planning: False assumptions and inappropriate analogies. Int J Mass Emerg Disas. 1994; 12(2): 141-158.

Scanlon J, Helsloot I, Groenendaal J: Putting it all together: Integrating ordinary people into emergency response. Int J Mass Emerg Disas. 2014; 32(1): 43-63.

Asp V, Bynander F, Daléus P, et al.: Bara skog som brinner? Utvärdering av Krishanteringen under Skogsbranden i Västmanland 2014 [Only Forest at fire?, Evaluation of the crisis management during the bush fire in Västmanland. 2014]. Stockholm: FHS/Crismart, 2015.

Strandh V, Eklund N: Emergent groups in disaster research: Varieties of scientific observations over time and across studies of nine natural disaster. J Contingencies Crisis Manag. 2018; 26(3): 329-337.

Dynes RR, Rodriguez H: Finding and framing Katrina: The social construction of disaster. In Brunsma DL, Overfelt D, Picou S (eds.): The Sociology of Katrina. Perspectives on a Modern Catastrophe. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc, 2007: 25-36.

Giritli Nygren K, Öhman S, Olofsson A: Doing and undoing risk: The mutual constitution of risk and heteronormativity in contemporary society. J Risk Res. 2017; 20(3): 418-432.

Johansson R: Vid den institutionella analysens gränser: Institutionell organisationsteori i sverige [at the boundaries of institutional analysis]. Nordiske Organisasjonsstudier. 2009; 11(3): 22-39.

Kvarnlöf L: Emergens i meads sociologi. Sociologisk Forskning. 2017; 53(3): 227-245.

Goffman E: Frame Analysis. London: Northeastern University Press, 1974.

Goffman E: The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin, 1990.

Oscarsson O, Danielsson E: Unrecognized crisis management—Normalizing everyday work: The work practice of crisis management in a refugee situation. J Contingencies Crisis Manag. 2018; 26(2): 225-236.

Kendra JM, Wachtendorf T: Elements of resilience after the world trade center disaster: Reconstructing New York city’s emergency operations center. Disaster. 2003; 27(1): 37-53.

Dynes RR: Organized Behavior in Disaster. Lexington, MA: Heath, Lexington Books, 1970.

Alvinius A, Danielsson E, Larsson G: The inadequacy of an ordinary organisation: Organisational adaptation to crisis through planned and spontaneous links. Int J Organ Behav. 2010; 15(1): 87-102.

Stallings RA, Quarantelli EL: Emergent citizen groups and emergency management. Public Adm Rev. 1985; 45(special issue): 93-100.

Kapucu N: Collaborative emergency management: Better community organising, better public preparedness and response. Disasters. 2008; 32(2): 239-262.

Kapucu N, Garayev V: Collaborative decision-making in emergency and disaster management. Int J Public Adm. 2011; 34(6): 366-375.

Phillips BD, Neal DM, Webb G: Introduction to Emergency Management. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2017.

Danielsson E: The value of crisis plans. J Emerg Manag. 2020; 18(4): 281-293.

Creed WED, Langstraat JA, Scully MA: A picture of the frame: Frame analysis as technique and as politics. Organ Res Methods. 2002; 5(1): 34-55.

Gieryn TF: Professionalization of American scientists: Public science in the creation/evolution trials. Am Sociol Rev. 1985; 48(6): 781-795.

Gieryn TF: A space for place in sociology. Annu Rev Sociol. 2000; 26(463): 463-496.

Johansson K, Lundgren AS: Gendering boundary work: Exploring excluded spaces in supermarket job rotation. Gender Place Cult. 2015; 22(2): 188-204.

Lounsbury M, Ventresca M, Hirsch PM: Social movements, field frames and industry emergence: A cultural–political perspective on US recycling. Socioecon Rev. 2003; 1(1): 71-104.

Star SL: The sociology of the invisible: The primacy of work in the writings of Anselm Strauss. In Social Organization and Social Process: Essays in Honor of Anselm Strauss. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter, 1991: 265-283.

Grape O: Domänkonsensus eller domänkonflikt? [Domain consensus or Domain conflict?]. In Grape O, Blom B, Johansson R (eds.): Organisation Och Omvärld–Nyinstitutionell Analys av Människobehandlande Organisationer [Organization and Environment–A New Institutional Analysis of Human Care Organizations]. Lund: Studentlitteratur, 2006: 47-72.

Grape O, Blom B, Johansson R: Organisation Och Omvärld: Nyinstitutionell Analys av Människobehandlande Organisationer [Organization and Environment—A New Institutional Analysis of Human Care Organizations]. Lund: Studentlitteratur, 2006.

Harding N, Ford J, Fotaki M: Is the ‘F’-word still dirty? A past, present and future of/for feminist and gender studies in organization. Organization. 2013; 20(1): 51-65.

Friedland R, Alford RR: Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ (eds.): The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991: 232-263.

Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ (eds.): The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991: 1-38.

Persson A: Framed school—Frame factors, frames and the dynamics of social interaction in school. Scand J Educ Res. 2015; 59(5): 499-514.

March JG, Simon HA: Organizations. Oxford: Blackwell Business, 1993. First published in 1958.

Zerubavel E: The Fine Line: Making Distinctions in Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.

Swedish Radio P4a: Published June 3, 2009, kl 16.21.

Swedish Radio P4b: Published September 14, 2009, kl 12.08.

Bauer MW, Gaskell G. (eds.): Qualitative Researching with TextImage and Sound: A Practical Handbook for Social Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2000.

Yin R: Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2009.

Swedish Research Council: Good, research practice, 2017. Available at https://www.vr.se/download/18.5639980c162791bbfe697882/1555334908942/Good-Research-Practice_VR_2017.pdf. Accessed April 23, 2021.

Enarson E: Men, masculinities and disaster: An action research agenda. In Enarson E, Pease B (eds.): Men, Masculinities and Disaster. London: Routledge, 2016.

Danielsson E, Sjöstedt-Landén A: Leader normativity in crisis management: Tales from a school fire. Risk Hazard Crisis Public Pol. 2020; 11(2): 139-165.

Ericson M, Mellström U: Firefighters, technology, masculinity in the micro-management of disasters in operational service: Examples from Sweden. In Enarson E, Pease B (eds.): Men, Masculinities and Disaster. London: Routledge, 2016: 165-174.

Glaser BG, Strauss AL: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1967.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.0557

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Emergency Management