Rescue coordination common operating picture: Enhancement through satellite technology

Leo T. Danaher, MS; Erik Wood, MS; Tim Frazier, PhD

doi:10.5055/jem.0682

Authors

Leo T. Danaher, MS
Erik Wood, MS https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0531-6314
Tim Frazier, PhD https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1270-5078

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.0682

Keywords:

common operating picture, emergency management, GIS, satellite, hazard mitigation

Abstract

Natural hazards and human-made disasters are increasing in magnitude and frequency due to climate change. The increase in response assets across agencies is complicating synchronization and communication during lifesaving operations. Technological advancements in wireless communication systems are improving resource tasking, tracking, and awareness but are vulnerable to interruption from the destruction inflicted by natural hazards. However, satellite technology offers solutions to safeguard lifesaving coordination in austere environments. Through a focused review of the relevant literature and policy documents, this study analyzes disaster response command and control, emerging communication capabilities, and satellite technology related to developing a common operating picture for all actors. The aim is to provide practicing emergency managers with the means to overcome communication gaps in wireless and satellite technology to maintain this common picture, save lives in the wake of disasters, and protect emergency responders during hazardous mass rescue operations. Results indicate that communication technology does aid emergency managers in the highly pressurized response environment but the systems being relied upon are themselves vulnerable to disasters. The existing literature also establishes that response actors are leveraging satellite technology to fill gaps in communications connectivity during disasters to reduce risk, which has both national and international implications.

Author Biographies

Leo T. Danaher, MS

Commanding Officer, US Coast Guard Maritime Safety & Security, Honolulu, Hawaii

Erik Wood, MS

Adjunct Faculty (Ethics, Research, GIS), Emergency and Disaster Management, Master’s Program, School of Continuing Studies, Georgetown University, Washington, DC

Tim Frazier, PhD

Professor of the Practice and Faculty Director, School of Continuing Studies (SCS), Georgetown University, Washington, DC

References

Puuska S, Rummukainen L, Timonen J, et al.: Nationwide critical infrastructure monitoring using a common operating picture framework. Int J Crit Infrastruct Protect. 2018; 20: 28-47.

Harrald J, Jefferson T: Shared situational awareness in emergency management mitigation and response. In 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’07). IEEE, 2007: 23.

Collins S: S.3721 - 109th Congress (2005-2006): Post-Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act of 2006. 2006. Available at https://www.congress.gov/bill/109th-congress/senate-bill/3721. Accessed September 1, 2020.

US Dept. of Homeland Security: National Response Framework (NRF). 2008. Washington, DC: US Dept. of Homeland Security. Available at https://www.fema.gov/pdf/emergency/nrf/nrf-core.pdf.

National Incident Management System (NIMS): NIMS guide—Communications and information management standards. 2009. NG0004. Available at https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/documents/fema_nims-preparedness-incident-management-standards_2008_0.pdf.

Smith JM: Comprehensive Common Operating Picture (COP) for Disaster Response. Fort Leavenworth: Army Command and General Staff Coll Fort Leavenworth KS School of Advanced Military Studies, 2012.

Danielsson E, Alvinius A, Larsson G: From common operating picture to situational awareness. IJEM. 2014; 10(1): 28-47.

Hallegatte S, Bangalore M, Bonzanigo L, et al.: Shock Waves: Managing the Impacts of Climate Change on Poverty. New York: The World Bank, 2015.

Anderson SE, Bart RR, Kennedy MC, et al.: The dangers of disaster-driven responses to climate change. Nat Clim Change. 2018; 8(8): 651-653.

Gibbons-Neff T: This is the US military’s response to Hurricane Harvey. Washington Post. 2017. Available at https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2017/08/28/this-is-the-u-s-militarys-response-to-hurricane-harvey/?utm_term=.7a5b97efb051.

US Census Bureau: Geographic data, interactive maps. US Department of Commerce. 2017. Available at https://datamapper.geo.census.gov/map.html. Accessed September 22, 2020.

Blake ES, Zelinsky DA: National hurricane center tropical cyclone report – Hurricane Harvey (al092017). 2018. Available at https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL092017_Harvey.pdf.

ESRI Industries: The Port of Rotterdam: Navigating to a world class port with GIS. 2017.

Soucy J: 30,000 more guardsmen ready to respond in hurricane relief effort. 2017. Available at https://www.defense.gov/Newsroom/News/Article/Article/1295693/30000-more-guardsmen-ready-torespond-in-hurricane-relief-effort/. Accessed August 28, 2020.

Phillips B: Qualitative methods and disaster research. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 1997; 15(1): 179-195.

Dudovskiy J: Research methodology: Data collection methods. 2011. Available at https://research-methodology.net/research-methods/data-collection/. Accessed August 1, 2020.

Alderman L, Towers S, Bannah S: Student feedback systems in higher education: A focused literature review and environmental scan. Qual Higher Educ. 2012; 18(3): 261-280.

Walton AL, Rogers B: Workplace hazards faced by nursing assistants in the United States: A focused literature review. IJERPH. 2017; 14(5): 544.

Boin A, Boin A, Hart P, et al.: The Politics of Crisis Management: Public Leadership under Pressure. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016.

Katoch A: The responders’ cauldron: The uniqueness of international disaster response. J Int Aff. 2006; 59(2): 153-172.

Lindell MK: Disaster studies. Curr Sociol. 2013; 61(5-6): 797-825.

Pawlowski MS: Catastrophic Events-Emergency Management Planning Requirements and Success Factors for Catastrophic Response Operations. Washington, DC: The George Washington University, 2012.

Texas Department of Public Safety: Rio Grande valley air evacuation exercise. 2011. Available at http://www.dps.texas.gov/dem/temoArchives/2011/Vol58No8/articles/article3.htm.

Griffith D, Wilson-Smith GK, Ohmer M, et al.: Coalition Airspace Management and Deconfliction. Rome, NY: Air Force Research Lab, 2008.

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA): The 2017 hurricane season FEMA after action report. Office of the FEMA Administrator & Government Printing Office. 2018. Available at https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/2020-08/fema_hurricaneseason-after-action-report_2017.pdf.

Miao X, Banister D, Tang Y: Embedding resilience in emergency resource management to cope with natural hazards. Nat Hazards. 2013; 69(3): 1389-1404. DOI: 10.1007/s11069-013-0753-4.

Meier P: Digital Humanitarians: How Big Data is Changing the Face of Humanitarian Response. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2015.

King SG: The Impact of Geographic Information Systems on Emergency Management Decision Making at the US Department of Homeland Security. Pittsburgh, PA: Robert Morris University, 2012.

National Research Council (NRC): Successful Response Starts with a Map Improving Geospatial Support for Disaster Management. Disaster Committee. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2007.

Tatham P, Spens K, Kovács G: The humanitarian common logistic operating picture: A solution to the inter-agency coordination challenge. Disasters. 2017; 41(1): 77-100.

Bawaba A: United States: Global satellite sets up GsatTrack. MENA report. 2012. Available at https://search-proquest-com.proxy.library.georgetown.edu/trade-journals/united-states-global-satelllite-sets-up-gsattrack/docview/1095408152/se-2?accountid=11091.

Kawasaki A, Berman ML, Guan W: The growing role of web-based geospatial technology in disaster response and support. Disasters. 2013; 37(2): 201-221. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2012.01302.x.

Tomaszweski B: Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for Disaster Management. Bocan Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2015.

Driscoll C: New technology advances Mendocino SAR. Ukiah J. 2018. Available at https://www.ukiahdailyjournal.com/2018/04/11/new-technology-advances-help-mendocino-search-and-rescue/. Accessed August 1, 2020.

Brackett HJ: Emergency management operations control system. In 2008 Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference. IEEE, Cospas/sarsat (1986), United States, 2008: 1-9. Available at http://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/004969053.

US Marine Corps Public Affairs Office: WRP California military asset list (MAL). 2015. Available at https://wrpinfo.org/media/1254/wrp-california-mals-2016.pdf. Accessed September 30, 2020.

Ike K: Communication on the High Seas: Signal Support to US Army Watercraft. Defense Visual Information Distribution Service, 2017. Available at https://www.dvidshub.net/news/222856/communication-high-seas-signal-support-army-watercraft. Accessed September 22, 2020.

Hickey K: DISA’s satellite-comm device helps with Colorado flood efforts. GCN Company. 2013. Available at https://gcn.com/articles/2013/09/25/disa-satellite-comm-device.aspx.

CLS America: n.d. Thorium X. Available at https://www.clsamerica.com/thoriumx. Accessed September 15, 2020.

Stuart SC: Team Rubicon trains veterans for high-tech disaster response. 2018. Available at https://uk.pcmag.com/news/118378/team-rubicon-trains-veterans-for-high-tech-disaster-response.

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA): Joint Field Office (JFO) Aviation Branch Operations Manual: Interagency Coordination for Federal Aviation Support to Disaster Operations. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office: Directives Management System, 2009.

Smith B: Inside the coast guard’s mass rescue operations. Emergency medical services world (EMSWorld.com). 2017. Available at https://www.emsworld.com/article/217940/inside-uscoast-guards-mass-rescue-operations.

Scott K: Joint Chiefs of Staff: Deployment and Redeployment Operations (J3-35). Arlington, VA: Department of Defense. US Government Printing Office, 2018.

nFocus Solutions: Case study: Effective emergency response. n.d. Available at https://www.nfocus.com/first-responders/.

Meroni A, Bahr T: Operational SAR data processing in GIS environments for rapid disaster mapping. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci. 2013; XL-1/W1(W1): 245-246. DOI: 10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-1-W1-245-2013.

Juvare: Juvare Corporation, LLC. 2019. Available at https://www.juvare.com/webeoc/. Accessed September 22, 2020.

Dwyer J, Flynn K: 9/11 tape raises added questions on radio failures. New York Times. 2002. Available at https://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/09/nyregion/9-11-tape-raises-added-questions-onradio-failures.html.

Job Creation Act: Public law 112–96—Feb. 22, 2012 (H.R. 3630). Available at https://www.congress.gov/112/plaws/publ96/PLAW-112publ96.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2020.

Gallagher JC: The first responder network (FirstNet) and next-generation communications for public safety: Issues for congress. Federation of American Scientists. 2014. Available at https://search.proquest.com/docview/1820769869. Accessed January 7, 2021.

FirstNet: Connecting communities-FY 2019 annual report to congress. 2019. Submitted to the United States Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the United States House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce. Available at https://firstnet.gov/system/tdf/FirstNet_Annual_Report_to_Congress_FY2019.pdf?file=1&type=node&id=1365&force=. Accessed January 7, 2021.

Government Accountability Office (GAO): Emergency communications: Office of emergency communications should take steps to help improve external communications. US Official News, December 12, 2018.

Hubler DE: Alaska quake proved value of new first responder network. Emergency & disaster management digest. 2019. Available at https://edmdigest.com/news/alaska-quake-first-responder-network/.

National Public Safety and Telecommunication Council (NPSTC): Non-P25 digital technologies will negatively impact on Hard-Won advances in public safety. 2014. Available at https://www.npstc.org/download.jsp?tableId=37&column=217&id=3018&file=NPSTC_Digital_Radio_Position_Paper_140415.pdf.

Bayless J, Brown M, Luke B, et al.: Defining Public Safety Grade Facilities and Systems. Littleton, CA: National Public Safety Telecommunications Council, 2014.

Knutson R: Cell network outages in Hurricane Harvey’s wake. Wall Street Journal. 2017. Available at https://www.wsj.com/articles/cell-networks-suffer-outages-in-harveys-wake-1503792185. Accessed August 28, 2020.

Federal Communications Commission (FCC): 2017 Atlantic hurricane season impact on communications report and recommendations public safety docket no. 17-344. 2017. Available at https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-353805A1.pdf.

Seybold A: Public safety advocate: Hurricane aftermath. 2017. Available at https://allthingsfirstnet.com/public-safety-advocatehurricane-aftermath/.

Office of Inspector General: FEMA’s initial response in New Jersey to Hurricane Sandy. 2013. Available at https://www.oig.dhs.gov/reports/2013/femas-initial-response-new-jersey-hurricane-sandy/signedanddatedfemaemotreportsmemo10. Accessed September 22, 2020.

LaPointe D: USGS Rolls out Ground Breaking Study; the HayWired Earthquake Scenario. Reston, VA: United States Geological Survey, 2018. Available at https://www.usgs.gov/news/usgs-rolls-outgroundbreaking-earthquake-study-haywired-earthquake-scenario?qt-news_science_products=1#qt-news_science_products.

Hartshorn D: Why Satellite Communications Are an Essential Tool for Emergency Management and Disaster Recovery GFV Solutions, Satellites Worldwide. Woodbridge, VA: Futron Corporation, 2017.

International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO): NAM/CAR Search and Rescue (SAR) Implementation and Civil-Military Coordination Meeting (SAR/CM) Mexico City, Mexico, 5–7 November 2018. 2018. Available at https://www.icao.int/NACC/Documents/Meetings/2018/SAR/SARMeeting-IP05.pdf. Accessed September 1, 2020.

Renfro AB, Stein M, Reed EB, et al.: An analysis of global positioning system (GPS) standard positioning service performance for 2019. Space and geophysics laboratory applied research laboratories the University of Texas at Austin GPS.gov. 2019. Available at https://www.gps.gov/systems/gps/performance/2019-GPS-SPSperformance-analysis.pdf.

Iridium: SHOUT Nano Datasheet. McLean, VA: Iridium Communications, 2019.

Warzinik J: Hurricane Florence & Michael Missouri Task Force 1 Disaster Situational Assessment & Reconnaissance (DSAR) Efforts. Boone County Fire Protection District. 2018. Available at https://www.napsgfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/2_MO-TF1-Hurricane-Florence-Michael-2018.pdf. Accessed December 4, 2020.

Kimball JB: SHOUT Nano Friendly Force Tracking in CG Helicopters & Flood Punts. Washington, DC: US Coast Guard, 2018.

United States Coast Guard (USCG): Hurricane Florence Operational Summary. Commanding Officer, Air Station Elizabeth City. 2019.

Hughes L: Lessons from disaster relief. 2018. Available at www.hughes.com. Accessed September 15, 2020.

Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA): Defense information systems agency strategic plan FY19-22. Version 2. 2019. Available at https://www.disa.mil/-/media/Files/DISA/About/Strategic-Plan.ashx.

Stumpe J: NASA tech aims to track tomorrow’s supersonic airliners. Aerospace Am. 2018; 56(3): 8.

Fitzgerald B: Operational surveillance and reconnaissance battalion. Milit Rev. 2017; 97(1): 66.

So A: 4 best satellite messengers for travelling off the grid. 2019. Available at https://www.wired.com/gallery/best-satellite-messengers/.

Sturdivant RL, Chong EKP: Systems engineering of a terabit elliptic orbit satellite and phased array ground station for IoT connectivity and consumer internet access. IEEE Access. 2016; 4: 9941-9957. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2608929.