Structures for collaboration and networked adaptation: Emerging themes from the COVID-19 pandemic

Stian Antonsen, PhD; Torgeir Kolstø Haavik, PhD; Tove Frykmer, PhD; Gudveig Gjøsund

doi:10.5055/jem.0705

Authors

Stian Antonsen, PhD https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6904-4739
Torgeir Kolstø Haavik, PhD
Tove Frykmer, PhD
Gudveig Gjøsund

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.0705

Keywords:

COVID-19, cross-sectoral collaboration, coordination, wicked problems

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic is a crisis that is “creeping” in its onset and “slow-burning” in its duration. It is characterized by extreme uncertainty, ambiguity, and complexity, presenting an unprecedented need for response across sectors and political-administrative levels. While there has been an explosion of research papers into the national strategies for handling the pandemic, empirical publications on the local and regional management are still scarce. This paper presents early empirical insights into key collaborative functions in Norway and Sweden, with an ambition to contribute to a research agenda focusing on the collaborative practices of pandemic crisis management. Our findings point to a set of themes that are all related to emerging collaborative structures, that fill holes in pre-established structures for dealing with crises, and that have been important for being able to effectively deal with the pandemic. At the municipal and regional levels, we see more examples of well-adapted collaborative practices than we see the wickedness of the problem causing inertia and paralysis. However, the emergence of new structures indicates a need to adapt organizational structures to the existing problem, and the duration of the current crisis allows for significant evolution of collaborative structures within the various phases of the pandemic. The lessons that can be drawn from this reveal a need for reconsideration of some of the basic assumptions of crisis research and practice, in particular the so-called similarity principle that is a cornerstone of emergency preparedness organization in many countries, including Norway and Sweden.

Author Biographies

Stian Antonsen, PhD

Professor, Department of Industrial Economics and Technology Management, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Gløshaugen; NTNU Social Research, Trondheim, Norway

Torgeir Kolstø Haavik, PhD

Associate Professor, Department of Sociology and Political Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Samfunnshuset, Dragvoll; NTNU Social Research, Trondheim, Norway

Tove Frykmer, PhD

Doctoral Student, Project Coordinator, Division of Risk Management and Societal Safety, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

Gudveig Gjøsund

Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Samfunnsforskning; NTNU Social Research, Trondheim, Norway

References

Gupta J, Termeer C, Klostermann J, et al.: The adaptive capacity wheel: A method to assess the inherent characteristics of institutions to enable the adaptive capacity of society. Environ Sci Policy. 2010; 13(6): 459-471.

Askim J, Bergström T: Between lockdown and calm down. Comparing the COVID-19 responses of Norway and Sweden. Local Government Stud. 2021; 1-21.

Boin A, McConnell A, t’Hart P: Governing the pandemic. In The Politics of Navigating a Mega-Crisis. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021.

Di Mascio F, Natalini A, Cacciatore F: Public administration and creeping crises: Insights from COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. Am Rev Public Adm. 2020; 50(6-7): 621-627.

Eriksson K, Staupe-Delgado R, Holst J: Drawing lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic: Seven obstacles to learning from public inquiries in the wake of the crisis. Risk Hazards Crisis Public Policy. 2021; 1-11.

Janssen M, van der Voort H: Agile and adaptive governance in crisis response: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Inform Manag. 2020; 55: 102180.

Moorkamp M, Torenvlied R, Kramer E-H: Organizational synthesis in transboundary crises: Three principles for managing centralization and coordination in the corona virus crisis response. J Contingen Crisis Manag. 2020; 28(2): 169-172.

Penta S, Kendra J, Marlowe V, et al.: A disaster by any other name?: COVID-19 and support for an all-hazards approach. Risks Hazards Crisis Public Policy. 2021; 12(3): 240-265.

Petridou E, Zahariadis N: Staying at home or going out? Leadership response to the COVID-19 crisis in Greece and Sweden. J Contingen Crisis Manag. 2021; 29(3): 293-302.

Pollock K, Steen R: Total defence resilience: Viable or not during COVID-19? A comparative study of Norway and the UK. Risk Hazards Crisis Public Policy. 2021; 12(1): 73-109.

Rasul G: A framework for improving policy priorities in managing COVID-19 challenges in developing countries. Front Public Health. 2020; 8: 589681-589681.

Ruiu ML: Mismanagement of COVID-19: Lessons learned from Italy. J Risk Res. 2020; 23(7-8): 1007-1020.

Meld S: Samfunnssikkerhet i en Usikker Verden [Societal Security in an Uncertain World]. Oslo: Ministry of Justice and Emergency Preparedness, 2020-2021.

MSB: Gemensamma Grunder För Samverkan Och Ledning Vid Samhällsstörningar [Common Guidelines for Collaboration and Command in Societal Disruptions]. Stockholm, Sweden: Myndigheten för Samhällsskydd Och Beredskap (MSB), 2018.

NOU: Samspill og Tillit—Om Staten og Lokaldemokratiet [Interplay and Trust—On the State and Local Democracy]. Oslo: Statens Forvaltningstjeneste Informasjonsforvaltning, 2005: 6.

Nesse S, Frykmer T: Politisk-administrativ ledelse i norge og sverige under pandemien: Forskjell i ansvarsstrategi, kapasitet og legitimitet [Political-administrative leadership in Norway and Sweden during the pandemic. Differences in response strategy, capacity and legitimacy]. Magma. 2020; 3: 94-103.

Christensen T, Lægreid P, Rykkja LH: Organizing for crisis management: Building governance capacity and legitimacy. Public Admin Rev. 2016; 76(6): 887-897.

Rittel HWJ, Webber MM: Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci. 1973; 4: 155-169.

Christensen T, Lægreid P, Rykkja LH: Wicked Problems and the Challenge of Transboundary Coordination: The Case of Emergency Preparedness and Crisis Management in Norway. Bergen: COCOPS Working Paper, 2013.

Ansell C, Gash A: Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J Public Adm Res Theory. 2007; 18(4): 543-571.

Ansell C, Gash A: Collaborative platforms as a governance strategy. J Public Adm Res Theory. 2018; 28(1): 16-32.

Emerson K, Nabatchi T, Balogh S: An integrative framework for collaborative governance. J Public Adm Res Theory. 2012; 22(1): 1-29.

Nambisan S: Platforms for collaboration. Stanford Soc Innov Rev. 2009; 7(3): 44-49.

Ansell C, Gash A: Stewardsmediators, and catalysts: Toward a model of collaborative leadership. Innov J. 2012; 17(1): 1-20.

Antonsen S, Gjøsund G, Haavik TK, et al.: Samordnet Beredskapsarbeid i Trondheim Kommune. Økt Trygghet og Redusert Sårbarhet [Coordinated Preparedness in Trondheim Municipality. Increased Security and Reduced Vulnerability]. Trondheim: NTNU Social Research, 2021.

Frykmer T, Hassel H, Cedergren A, et al.: Forskningsstudie av Arbetet i Länsstyrelsernas Samordningskansli Som Etablerats Med Anledning av covid19 [Research Study of the County Boards’ Coordination Office That Was Established for COVID-19]. Lund: Avdelningen För Riskhantering Och Samhällssäkerhet, Lunds Universitet, 2021.

Yin RK: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2014.

Antonsen S, Haavik T: Case studies in safety research. In Gould KP, Macrae C (Eds.): Inside Hazardous Technological Systems. Methodological Foundations, Challenges and Future Directions. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2021.

Bryman A: Social Research Methods (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

Barley SR, Kunda G: Bringing work back in. Organiz Sci. 2001; 12(1): 76-95.

Glaser BG, Strauss AL: The Discovery of Grounded Theory. New York: Aldine De Gruyter, 1967.

Lagadec P: Preventing Chaos in a Crisis: Strategies for Prevention, Control, and Damage Limitation. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1993.

Boin A, Ekengren M, Rhinard M: Hiding in plain sight: Conceptualizing the creeping crisis. Risks Hazards Crisis Public Policy. 2020; 11(2): 116-138.

Kalleberg AL, Nesheim T, Olsen KM: Is participation good or bad for workers? Effects of autonomy, consultation and teamwork on stress among workers in Norway. Acta Sociologica. 2009; 52(2): 99-116.

Burt RS: Structural holes versus network closure as social capital. In Social Capital. Chicago: University of Chicago, 2017: 31-56.

Schiefloe PM: Sosiale Landskap og Sosial Kapital: Nettverk og Nettverksforskning [Social Landscapes and Social Capital]. Networks and Network Research. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 2015.

La Porte TR, Consolini PM: Working in practice but not in theory: Theoretical challenges of high reliability. J Public Adm Theory. 1991; 1: 19-47.

Rochlin GI: Informal organizational networking as a crisis-avoidance strategy: US naval flight operations as a case study. Organiz Environ. 1989; 3(2): 159-176.

Almklov P, Antonsen S: Making work invisible: New public management and operational work in critical infrastructure sectors. Public Admin. 2014; 92(2): 477-492.

Fischbacher-Smith D, Fischbacher-Smith M: What lies beneath? The role of informal and hidden networks in the management of crises. Finan Account Manag. 2014; 30(3): 259-278.

Argyris C, Schön DA: Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1996.

Spector B: Constructing Crisis: Leaders, Crises and Claims of Urgency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.

Turner BA, Pidgeon NF: Man-Made Disasters (2nd ed.). Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann, 1997.

Burt RS: Structural holes and good ideas. Am J Sociol. 2004; 110(2): 349-399.

Dynes RR: Organized Behavior in Disaster. Lexington, MA: Heath Lexington Books, 1970.

Boin A, ‘t Hart P: Aligning executive action in times of adversity: The politics of crisis co-ordination. In Lodge M, Wegrich K (eds.): Executive Politics in Times of Crisis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.

Frykmer T, Uhr C, Bergström J: Organised behaviour in the Swedish fire and rescue service—A case study. In Proceedings of the European Safety and Reliability Conference ESREL. September 7-10, Zurich, Switzerland, 2015.

Drennan LT, McConnell A: Risk and Crisis Management in the Public Sector. New York: Routledge, 2007.

Rosenthal U, t’Hart P, Charles MT: The world of crises and crisis management. In Rosenthal U, Charles MT, t’Hart P (eds.): Coping with Crises: The Management of Disasters, Riots and Terrorism. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas, 1989.

Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM: Managing the Unexpected: Resilient Performance in an Age of Uncertainty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2007.

Schiefloe PM: The corona crisis: A wicked problem. Scand J Public Health. 2021; 49(1): 5-8.

Head BW, Alford J: Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Adm Soc. 2015; 47(6): 711-739.

Lyles MA, Mitroff I: Organizational problem formulation: An empirical study. Adm Sci Q. 1980; 25(1): 102-119.

Massey A, Wallace WA: Understanding and facilitating group problem structuring and formulation: Mental representations, interaction, and representation aids. Decis Support Syst. 1996; 17(4): 253-274.

Baer M, Dirks KT, Nickerson JA: Microfoundations of strategic problem formulation. Strat Mgmt J. 2013; 34(2): 197-214.

Roe E: Making the Most of Mess. Reliability and Policy in Today’s Management Challenges. Durham: Duke University Press, 2013.

Wolbers J, Kuipers S, Boin A: A systematic review of 20 years of crisis and disaster research: Trends and progress. Risk Hazard Crisis Public Policy. 2021; 12(4): 374-392.