Learning from disaster: A natural experiment exploring disaster preparedness before and during the COVID-19 pandemic by houses of worship
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.0687Keywords:
emergency preparedness, natural experiment, faith-based organizations, congregations and churches, organizational learning, COVID-19Abstract
This study illuminates how congregations adapted to an unfolding crisis in real-time and reveals areas of organizational learning and vulnerability. The driving question of this study asks “how has congregational disaster readiness changed during COVID-19?” From this, three measurable corollary questions emerge. First, how has experience during the pandemic changed risk assessment and planning? Second, how has disaster networking changed due to pandemic experiences? Third, did pandemic experience lead to a change in collaboration activities and actions? A natural experiment research design is used to answer these questions. Data collected from survey responses from 50 congregational leaders in 2020 are compared to their baseline responses and interviews as part of a more extensive study from 2019 of over 300 leaders. Descriptive analysis is used to evaluate how congregational leaders changed their risk assessment, disaster planning, disaster networking, and collaboration activities from 2019 to 2020. Open-ended questions provide qualitative context for the survey responses. Initial results support two themes for scholars and emergency managers: learning is immediate, and network maintenance matters. First, while awareness of pandemics has grown, congregational leaders narrowly applied the lessons they learned to temporally and spatially immediate hazards. Second, congregational networking and collaboration became more insular and local during the pandemic response. These results could have substantial implications for community resilience, especially given the role congregations and similar organizations play in community disaster resiliency.
References
Singer P: Faith groups provide the bulk of disaster recovery, in coordination with FEMA. USA Today, September 10, 2017. Available at https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/09/10/hurricane-irma-faith-groups-provide-bulk-disaster-recovery-coordination-fema/651007001/. Accessed January 16, 2018.
De Vita CJ, Kramer FD, Eyster L, et al.: The Role of Faith-Based and Community Organizations in Post-Hurricane Human Service Relief Efforts. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute, 2008. Available at https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/29751/1001245-The-Role-of-Faith-Based-and-Community-Organizations-in-Post-Hurricane-Human-Services-Relief-Efforts.PDF. Accessed October 28, 2017.
Banks A: Homeless find rest in faith-based shelters more than others. Religion News Service, February 1, 2017. Available at https://religionnews.com/2017/02/01/homeless-find-rest-in-faithbased-shelters-more-than-others/. Accessed February 25, 2021.
Revkin A: Development and disasters—A deadly combination well beyond Houston. ProPublica, August 31, 2017. Available at https://www.propublica.org/article/development-and-disasters-adeadly-combination-well-beyond-houston. Accessed December 30, 2019.
Strader SM, Ashley WS: The expanding Bull’s-Eye effect. Weatherwise. 2015; 68(5): 23-29. DOI: 10.1080/00431672.2015.1067108.
US Global Change Research Program: Impacts, Risks, and Adaptation in the United States: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Vol. II. US Global Change Research Program, 2018, 1515. DOI: 10.7930/NCA4.2018.
James A: High COVID-19 attack rate among attendees at events at a church—Arkansas. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020; 2020: 69. DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6920e2.
Hamner L: High SARS-CoV-2 attack rate following exposure at a choir practice—Skagit county, Washington. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020; 2020: 69. DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6919e6.
Pung R, Chiew CJ, Young BE, et al.: Investigation of three clusters of COVID-19 in Singapore: Implications for surveillance and response measures. The Lancet. 2020; 395(10229): 1039-1046. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30528-6.
Kim MJ: Churches have become South Korea’s coronavirus battleground. Washington Post. Available at https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/churches-coronavirus-south-koreareligion/2020/09/17/6ea63912-f6fd-11ea-85f7-5941188a98cd_story.html. Accessed March 23, 2021.
Sun LH, Dawsey J: White House and CDC remove coronavirus warnings about choirs in faith guidance. Washington Post. Available at https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/white-houseand-cdc-remove-coronavirus-warnings-about-choirs-in-faith-guidance/2020/05/28/5d9c526e-a117-11ea-9590-1858a893bd59_story.html. Accessed February 25, 2021.
Diamond J, Robinson JA (eds.): Natural Experiments of History. Reprint edition. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2011.
The New York Times: See reopening plans and mask mandates for all 50 states. The New York Times, April 25, 2020. Available at https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/states-reopen-mapcoronavirus.html. Accessed September 4, 2021.
Birkland TA: Lessons of Disaster: Policy Change after Catastrophic Events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2006.
Lindell MK, Perry RW: Household adjustment to earthquake hazard: A review of research. Environ Behav. 2000; 32(4): 461-501. DOI: 10.1177/00139160021972621.
Rivera JD, Nickels AE: Social capital, community resilience, and faith-based organizations in disaster recovery: A case study of Mary Queen of Vietnam catholic church. Risk Hazards Crisis Public Policy. 2014; 5(2): 178-211. DOI: 10.1002/rhc3.12050.
Farrag H, Loskota B, Flory R: Faithful Action: Working with Religious Groups in Disaster Planning, Response and Recovery. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California, 2012.
Murphy H, Pudlo JM: Bridging cultures: Nonprofit, church, and emergency management agency collaboration after the May 2013 Oklahoma tornado outbreak. J Emerg Manag. 2017; 15(3): 157-174. DOI: 10.5055/jem.2017.0325.
Lindell MK: Disaster studies. Curr Sociol. 2013; 61(5-6): 797-825. DOI: 10.1177/0011392113484456.
Cnaan R, Curtis DW: Religious congregations as voluntary associations: An overview. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q. 2013; 42(1): 7-33. DOI: 10.1177/0899764012460730.
Ritchie L, Tierney K, Gilbert B: Disaster preparedness among community-based organizations in the City and County of San Francisco: Serving the most vulnerable. In Miller DS, Rivera JD (eds.): Community Disaster Recovery and Resiliency. Milton Park: Taylor & Francis, 2011: 3-39.
Chikoto GL, Sadiq AA, Fordyce E: Disaster mitigation and preparedness: Comparison of nonprofit, public, and private organizations. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q. 2013; 42(2): 391-410. DOI: 10.1177/0899764012452042.
Chikoto-Schultz GL, Russo A, Manson P, et al.: Oregon nonprofit disaster preparedness: Findings from the 2018 survey. The Nonprofit Institute Research, 2018: 28. Available at https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/npi_research/2/. Accessed March 23, 2021.
Maher CS, Hoang T, Hindery A: Fiscal responses to COVID-19: Evidence from local governments and nonprofits. Public Admin Rev. 2020; 80(4): 644-650. DOI: 10.1111/puar.13238.
COVID-19 Congregational Study. Indianapolis, IN: Lake Institute on Faith & Giving, 2020. Available at https://philanthropy.iupui.edu/institutes/lake-institute/covid-study.html. Accessed March 23, 2021.
Dzigbede KD, Gehl SB, Willoughby K: Disaster resiliency of U.S. Local governments: Insights to strengthen local response and recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Admin Rev. 2020; 80(4): 634-643. DOI: 10.1111/puar.13249.
O’Leary R, Gerard C, Bingham LB: Introduction to the symposium on collaborative public management. Public Adm Rev. 2006; 66: 6-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00661.x.
Simo G, Bies A: The role of nonprofits in disaster response: An expanded model of cross-sector collaboration. Public Adm Rev. 2007; 67(s1): 125-142. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00821.x.
Bryson JM, Crosby BC, Stone MM: The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Adm Rev. 2006; 66: 44-55. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x.
Robinson SE, Gaddis BS: Seeing past parallel play: Survey measures of collaboration in disaster situations. Policy Stud J. 2012; 40(2): 256-273.
Martin E, Nolte I, Vitolo E: The four Cs of disaster partnering: Communication, cooperation, coordination and collaboration. Disasters. 2016; 40(4): 621-643. DOI: 10.1111/disa.12173.
Bryson JM, Crosby BC, Stone MM: Designing and implementing cross-sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Admin Rev. 2015; 75(5): 647-663. DOI: 10.1111/puar.12432.
Waugh WL, Streib G: Collaboration and leadership for effective emergency management. Public Adm Rev. 2006; 66(s1): 131-140.
Aldrich DP: Building Resilience: Social Capital in Post-Disaster Recovery. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2012. 35. Aldrich DP, Meyer MA: Social capital and community resilience. Am Behav Sci. 2015; 59(2): 254-269. DOI: 10.1177/0002764214550299.
Moynihan DP: The network governance of crisis response: Case studies of incident command systems. J Public Adm Res Theory. 2009; 19(4): 895-915. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mun033.
O’Donovan K: Policy failure and policy learning: Examining the conditions of learning after disaster: Policy failure and policy learning. Rev Policy Res. 2017; 34(4): 537-558. DOI: 10.1111/ropr.12239.
Albright EA, Crow DA: Capacity building toward resilience: How communities recover, learn, and change in the aftermath of extreme events. Policy Stud J. 2021; 49: 89-122. DOI: 10.1111/psj.12364.
Howlett M: The lessons of failure: Learning and blame avoidance in public policy-making. Int Polit Sci Rev. 2012; 33(5): 539-555. DOI: 10.1177/0192512112453603.
Lindell MK, Arlikatti S, Prater CS: Why people do what they do to protect against earthquake risk: Perceptions of hazard adjustment attributes. Risk Anal. 2009; 29(8): 1072-1088. DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01243.x.
Dunning T: Improving causal inference: Strengths and limitations of natural experiments. Polit Res Q. 2008; 61(2): 282-293. DOI: 10.1177/1065912907306470.
Creswell JW: Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc, 2014.
Steensland B, Robinson LD, Wilcox WB, et al.: The measure of American religion: Toward improving the state of the art. Soc Forces. 2000; 79(1): 291-318. DOI: 10.1093/sf/79.1.291.
America’s Changing Religious Landscape. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center, 2015.
Congregational Preparedness and Disaster Response Networks. Louisville, KY: Louisville Institute, 2020.
Chaves M, Hawkins M, Holleman A, et al.: Introducing the fourth wave of the national congregations study. J Sci Study Relig. 2020; 59(4): 646-650. DOI: 10.1111/jssr.12684.
Chaves M, Roso J, Holleman A, et al.: National Congregations Study: Waves I-IV Summary Table. Durham, NC: Duke University Department of Sociology, 2020. Available at https://sites.duke.edu/ncsweb/files/2021/01/NCS-IV_Summary-Tables_For-Posting.pdf. Accessed March 21, 2021.
Cnaan R: The Invisible Caring Hand: American Congregations and the Provision of Welfare. New York, NY: NYU Press, 2002.
Dougherty KD, Chaves M, Emerson MO: Racial diversity in U.S. congregations, 1998–2019. J Sci Study Relig. 2020; 59(4): 651-662. DOI: 10.1111/jssr.12681.
Bolin B, Kurtz LC: Race class, ethnicity, and disaster vulnerability. In Rodríguez H, Donner W, Trainor JE (eds.): Handbook of Disaster Research. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Berlin: Springer, 2018: 181-203. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-63254-4_10.
Perry SL, Whitehead AL, Grubbs JB: Culture wars and COVID-19 conduct: Christian nationalism, religiosity, and Americans’ behavior during the coronavirus pandemic. J Sci Study Relig. 2020; 59(3): 405-416. DOI: 10.1111/jssr.12677.
Shimron Y: Black protestants aren’t least likely to get a vaccine; White evangelicals are. Religion News Service, March 5, 2021. Available at https://religionnews.com/2021/03/05/black-protestantsarent-least-likely-to-get-a-vaccine-white-evangelicals-are/. Accessed September 5, 2021.
Chaves M: Denominations as dual structures: An organizational analysis. Sociol Relig. 1993; 54(2): 147-169. DOI: 10.2307/3712137.
Hinings CR, Raynard M: Organizational form, structure, and religious organizations. In Tracey P, Phillips N, Lounsbury M (eds.): Religion and Organization Theory: Vol. 41: Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Emerald Group, 2014: 159-186. Available at http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/S0733-558X20140000041013. Accessed October 15, 2015.
Burge RP, Lewis AR: Measuring evangelicals: Practical considerations for social scientists. Polit Relig. 2018; 11(04): 745-759. DOI: 10.1017/S1755048318000299.
Hackett C, Lindsay DM: Measuring evangelicalism: Consequences of different operationalization strategies. J Sci Study Relig. 2008; 47(3): 499-514. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2008.00423.x.
Regions | FEMA.gov: Available at https://www.fema.gov/about/organization/regions. Accessed March 22, 2021.
Krocak MJ, Brooks HE: Climatological estimates of hourly tornado probability for the United States. Weather Forecast. 2018; 33(1): 59-69. DOI: 10.1175/WAF-D-17-0123.1.
Lindblom CE: The science of “muddling Through”. Public Adm Rev. 1959; 19(2): 79-88.
Grizzle D, Goodin A, Robinson SE: Connecting with new partners in COVID-19 response. Public Admin Rev. 2020; 80(4): 629-633. DOI: 10.1111/puar.13247.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright 2007-2023, Weston Medical Publishing, LLC and Journal of Emergency Management. All Rights Reserved
