Managing risk and information asymmetry in cross-sector networks: The case of the West, Texas fertilizer plant explosion




risk communication, cross-sector networks, technological hazards, managing shared risk


Technological hazards threaten public safety, and related risk cuts across jurisdictional boundaries, requiring a multiorganizational effort to mitigate. Yet, for those involved, ineffective risk recognition inhibits appropriate action. Using an embedded single-case study design, this article examines the 2013 West, Texas, fertilizer plant explosion and the networks of organizations responsible for disaster prevention, mitigation, preparedness, and response. Aspects of risk detection, communication, and interpretation and a series of self and collective mobilization efforts were analyzed. Findings demonstrate that information gaps between key actors, ie, information asymmetry—particularly the company, regulators, and local officials—hindered effective decision making. The case reveals the limitations of contemporary bureaucratic structures for the collective management of risk and the need for network governance that takes a more flexible and adaptive approach. The discussion section concludes with an outline of essential steps to improve the management of similar systems.

Author Biographies

Clayton Wukich, PhD

Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Affairs, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio

Thomas W. Haase, PhD

Department of Political Science, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, Texas

Wenjiun Wang, PhD

College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, Texas


Comfort LK: The Dynamics of Risk: Changing Technologies and Collective Action in Seismic Events. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2019.

Kettl DF: System under Stress: Homeland Security and American Politics. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2007.

Nowell B, Steelman T, Velez A-LK, et al.: The structure of effective governance of disaster response networks: Insights from the field. Am Rev Public Adm. 2018; 48(7): 699-715.

Waugh WL Jr, Streib G: Collaboration and leadership for effective emergency management. Public Adm Rev. 2006; 66(s1): 131-140.

Wildavsky AB: Searching for Safety. New Brunswick: Transaction, 1988.

Davis C: The West in flames: The intergovernmental politics of wildfire suppression and prevention. Publius J Federal. 2001; 31(3): 97-110.

McEntire DA, Myers A: Preparing communities for disasters: Issues and processes for government readiness. Disaster Prevent Manag. 2004; 13(2): 140-152.

Nowell B, Steelman T: Beyond ICS: How should we govern complex disasters in the United States? J Homel Secur Emerg Manag. 2019; 16(2): 20180067.

Perrow C: The Next Catastrophe: Reducing Our Vulnerabilities to Natural, Industrial, and Terrorist Disasters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007.

Comfort LK: Crisis management in hindsight: Cognition, communication, coordination, and control. Public Adm Rev. 2007; 67(s1): 189-197.

Kapucu N: Interagency communication networks during emergencies: Boundary spanners in multiagency coordination. Am Rev Public Adm. 2006; 36(2): 207-225.

Kapucu N: Collaborative emergency management: Better community organising, better public preparedness and response. Disasters. 2008; 32(2): 239-262.

Nohrstedt D, Bynander F, Parker C, et al.: Managing crises collaboratively: Prospects and problems—A systematic literature review. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance. 2018; 1(4): 257-271. DOI: 10.1093/ppmgov/gvx018.

Kapucu N, Arslan T, Demiroz F: Collaborative Emergency Management and National Emergency Management Network. Disaster Prevent Manag. 2010; 19(4): 452-468.

Comfort LK, Haase TW: Communication, coherence, and collective action: The impact of Hurricane Katrina on communications infrastructure. Public Works Manag Policy. 2006; 10(4): 328-343.

Hu Q, Knox CC, Kapucu N: What have we learned since September 11, 2001? A network study of the Boston marathon bombings response. Public Adm Rev. 2014; 74(6): 698-712.

Wolbers J: Understanding distributed sensemaking in crisis management: The case of the Utrecht terrorist attack. J Contingen Crisis Manag. 2021. DOI: 10.1111/1468-5973.12382.

Mills RW, Koliba CJ: The challenge of accountability in complex regulatory networks: The case of the deepwater horizon oil spill. Regul Govern. 2015; 9(1): 77-91.

Perrow C: Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies. 2nd ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.

Comfort LK, Waugh WL, Cigler BA: Emergency management research and practice in public administration: Emergence, evolution, expansion, and future directions. Public Adm Rev. 2012; 72(4): 539-547.

Ostrom E: Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.

Comfort LK: Shared Risk: Complex Systems in Seismic Response. New York: Pergamon, 1999.

Rosenthal U, Boin A, Comfort LK (eds.): Managing Crises: Threats, Dilemmas, Opportunities. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas, 2001.

Endsley MR: Expertise and situation awareness. The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2018: 714-741.

Endsley MR: Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors. 1995; 37(1): 32-64.

Klein GA, Orasanu J, Calderwood R, et al. (eds.): Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Pub., 1993.

Klein GA: The Power of Intuition: How to Use Your Gut Feelings to Make Better Decisions at Work. New York: Currency, 2004.

Koliba CJ, Mills RM, Zia A: Accountability in governance networks: An assessment of public, private, and nonprofit emergency management practices following Hurricane Katrina. Public Adm Rev. 2011; 71(2): 210-220.

Bach T, Wegrich K: The Blind Spots of Public Bureaucracy and the Politics of Non-Coordination. London: Springer, 2019.

Lodge M: Accounting for blind spots. In Bach T, Wegrich K (eds.): The Blind Spots of Public Bureaucracy and the Politics of Non-Coordination. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019: 29-48.

Day JM, Junglas I, Silva L: Information flow impediments in disaster relief supply chains. JAIS. 2009; 10(8): 637-660.

Hutchins E: Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.

Wolbers J, Boersma K: The common operational picture as collective sensemaking. J Contingen Crisis Man. 2013; 21(4): 186-199.

LaPorte TR, Consolini PM: Working in practice but not in theory: Theoretical challenges of “high-reliability organizations.” J Public Adm Res Theory. 1991; 1(1): 19-48.

Weick KE: The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Adm Sci Quar. 1993; 38(4): 628-652.

Glick JA, Barbara JA: Moving from situational awareness to decisions during disaster response: Transition to decision making. J Emerg Manag. 2013; 11(6): 423-432.

Lindell MK, Perry RW: The protective action decision model: Theoretical modifications and additional evidence. Risk Analysis. 2012; 32(4): 616-632.

Lindell MK: Communicating imminent risk. In Rodríguez H, Donner W, Trainor JE (eds.): Handbook of Disaster Research. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2018: 449-477.

Weick KE: Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1995.

Palttala P, Boano C, Lund R, et al.: Communication gaps in disaster management: Perceptions by experts from governmental and non-governmental organizations. J Contingen Crisis Man. 2012; 20(1): 2-12.

Karagiannis GM, Synolakis C: Twenty challenges in incident planning. J Homel Secur Emerg Manag. 2017; 14(2): 1-12.

May PJ, Williams W: Disaster Policy Implementation: Managing Programs under Shared Governance. New York: Springer Verlag, 2012.

Alexander DE: Disaster and emergency planning for preparedness, response, and recovery Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Natural Hazard Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015: 1-20.

Perry RW, Lindell MK: Emergency Planning. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2007.

McEntire DA: Revisiting the purpose of disaster planning. J Emerg Manag. 2006; 4(1): 7-8.

Danielsson E: The value of crisis plans. J Emerg Manag. 2020; 18(4): 281-293.

Eriksson K: Framework for crisis preparedness planning: Four required areas for developing a learning process. J Emerg Manag. 2015; 13(6): 519-531.

Comfort LK: Asymmetric information processes in extreme events: The December 26, 2004 Sumatran Earthquake and Tsunami. In Gibbons DE (ed.): Communicable Crises: Prevention, Response, and Recovery in the Global Arena. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishers, 2007: 84-137.

Robinson SE, Eller WS, Gall M, et al.: The core and periphery of emergency management networks. Public Manag Rev. 2013; 15(3): 344-362.

Jensen J, Waugh WL: The United States’ experience with the incident command system: What we think we know and what we need to know more about. J Contingencies Crisis Man. 2014; 22(1): 5-17.

Buck DA, Trainor JE, Aguirre BE: A critical evaluation of the incident command system and NIMS. J Homel Secur Emerg Manag. 2006; 3(3): 1-27.

Quarantelli EL: Disaster crisis management: A summary of research findings. J Manag Stud. 1988; 25(4): 373-385.

Comfort LK: Fragility in disaster response: Hurricane Katrina, 29 August 2005. The Forum. 2005; 3(3). DOI: 10.2202/1540-8884.1090.

Hu Q, Kapucu N: Information communication technology utilization for effective emergency management networks. Public Manag Rev. 2016; 18(3): 323-348.

Mendonça D: Decision support for improvisation in response to extreme events. Decis Support Syst. 2007; 43(3): 952-967.

Rochlin GI: Reliable organizations: Present research and future directions. J Contingen Crisis Man. 1996; 4(2): 55-59.

Boin A, ’t Hart P, Stern E, et al.: The Politics of Crisis Management: Public Leadership under Pressure. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2017.

Comfort LK, Boin A, Demchak CC (eds.): Designing Resilience: Preparing for Extreme Events. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2010.

Tierney K, Trainor J: Networks and Resilience in the World Trade Center Disaster. Buffalo, NY: University at Buffalo, 2004.

Mergel I: The use of social media to dissolve knowledge silos in government. In O’Leary R, Van Slyke DM, Kim S (eds.): The Future of Public Administration, Public Management and Public Service around the World: The Minnowbrook Perspective. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2010: 177-187.

Yin RK: Applications of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2012.

US Chemical Safety and Hazards Investigation Board: Investigation Report: West Fertilizer Explosion and Fire. Washington, DC: US Chemical Safety and Hazards Investigation Board, 2016.

Texas State Fire Marshal’s Office: West Texas Firefighter Fatality Investigation. Austin, TX: Texas State Fire Marshal’s Office, 2014.

Hu Q: Conducting content analysis of documents in network research: A review of recent scholarship. CGN. 2015; 2(1): 83-102.

Knox CC: Analyzing after-action reports from hurricanes Andrew and Katrina: Repeated, modified, and newly created recommendations. J Emerg Manag. 2013; 11(2): 160-168.

Knox CC: Systematic analysis of after-action reports: A plan evaluation methodological approach. Nat Hazards Rev. 2021; 22(4): 06021004.

Swanson DJ, Tarrant D: West explosion: It could happen again. Dallas Morning News. December 14, 2013.

Henry T: After West fertilizer explosion, concerns over safety, regulation and zoning. StateImpact. April 22, 2013.

Covert B: A year after the deadly West, Texas explosion, no new regulations. Think Progress. April 17, 2014.

Hart KP: DPS official: “System worked” in West explosion. Houston Chronicle. May 1, 2013.

Bajpai A: Will fertilizer plant fire in North Carolina spark action? Government Technology. 2022.

Comfort LK, Sungu Y, Johnson D, et al.: Complex systems in crisis: Anticipation and resilience in dynamic environments. J Contin Crisis Manag. 2001; 9(3): 144-158.



How to Cite

Wukich , C., T. W. Haase, and W. Wang. “Managing Risk and Information Asymmetry in Cross-Sector Networks: The Case of the West, Texas Fertilizer Plant Explosion”. Journal of Emergency Management, vol. 21, no. 2, May 2023, pp. 109-22, doi:10.5055/jem.0758.