Using neurotechnology in the emergency and safety management for creating a safer work environment

James Adams; Mahmud Hasan; Jacob Thorp

doi:10.5055/jem.0768

Authors

James Adams, BS
Mahmud Hasan, PhD, PE, CSP https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6275-392X
Jacob Thorp, BS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.0768

Keywords:

brain–computer interface, neurology, neurotechnology, safety management, personal protective equipment (PPE), wearables, implants

Abstract

Brain–computer interfaces are emerging neurotechnology conducting specific commands or outputs based on acquiring brain signals or inputs. This study examines the common hazards present in industries, which can be managed by neurotechnology, as well as compares two types of brain–computer interfaces in the neurotechnology area. The findings from this work suggest acknowledging current safety management practices and technology that can promote a safer work environment, in addition to increasing probable applications of use of the current research findings related to neurotechnology. This study advises understanding the risks associated between noninvasive and invasive neurotechnologies, whereas noninvasive technologies are safer that exhibit lesser degrees of accuracy or applications of use compared to its counterpart, which is invasive technology. This study proposes future development of this technology, which can integrate components based on common practices by industry.

Author Biographies

James Adams, BS

Computer Science and Engineering Technology (CSET) Department, University of Houston-Downtown (UHD), Houston, Texas

Mahmud Hasan, PhD, PE, CSP

Faculty Advisor, ASSP UHD Student Chapter, Computer Science and Engineering Technology (CSET) Department, University of Houston-Downtown (UHD), Houston, Texas

Jacob Thorp, BS

Computer Science and Engineering Technology (CSET) Department, University of Houston-Downtown (UHD), Houston, Texas

References

Cincotti F: Non-invasive brain–computer interface system: Towards its application as assistive technology. Brain Res Bull. 2008; 75: 796-803.

Shih JJ: Brain-computer interfaces in medicine. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012; 87(3): 268-279.

Millán JdR, Ferrez PW, Buttfield A: Non-invasive brain-machine interfaces. Final report, IDIAP Research Institute, ESA. 4. Drew L: The ethics of brain–computer interfaces. Nature. 2019; 571: S19-S21.

Science Museum Group Collection: Graz Brain-Computer Interface Cap and Electrodes. Available at https://www.jstor.org/site/artstor/open-science-museum-group/grazbrain-computerinterfacecapandelectrodesco8081240-29912162/?searchkey=1674862819271. Accessed January 31, 2023.

Kaiser V: Cortical effects of user training in a motor imagery based brain–computer interface measured by FNIRS and EEG. NeuroImage, 2014; 85(Pt 1): 432-444.

American Board of Industrial Hygiene: IH defined: Abih, 2021. Available at https://www.aiha.org/about-aiha. Accessed January 31, 2023.

International Occupational Hygiene Association (IOHA): Hazards, 2021. Available at https://www.ioha.net/about/occupational-hygiene/. Accessed January 31, 2023.

Canadian Centre for Occupational Health & Safety: Biological hazards, 1997. Available at https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/biol_hazards/. Accessed January 31, 2023.

Controlling Ergonomic Hazards: WOSH Specialist Training Supplemental Module, Factsheet E, Preventing Musculoskeletal Disorders. Available at https://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/2018-12/fy11_sh-22240-11_ErgoHazards.pdf. Accessed January 31, 2023.

Australian Government: Physical hazards, Comcare, September 23, 2020. Available at https://www.comcare.gov.au/safe-healthywork/prevent-harm/physical-hazards. Accessed January 31, 2023.

Government of Western Australia: Psychosocial hazards overview. 2021. Available at https://www.dmp.wa.gov.au/Safety/Psychosocialhazards-overview-25390.aspx. Accessed January 31, 2023.

US Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, OSHA 3151-12R: Personal protective equipment. 2004. Available at https://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/osha3151.pdf. Accessed January 31, 2023.

Anvil: Safety, quality, and operations insights. 2021. Available at https://anvilgroup.com/operational-resilience/. Accessed January 31, 2023.

National Cancer Institute—SEER Training Modules: Cerebrum. 2021. Available at https://training.seer.cancer.gov/. Accessed January 31, 2023.

Uddin LQ, Nomi JS, Hebert-Seropian B, et al.: Structure and function of the human insula. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2017; 34(4): 300-306.

Brigham Young University, Idaho: Cerebrum. 2021. Available at https://content.byui.edu/file/a236934c-3c60-4fe9-90aa-d343b3e3a640/1/module11/readings/cerebrum.html. Accessed January 31, 2023.

Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.: Perception. 2021. Available at https://www.britannica.com/topic/perception. Accessed January 31, 2023.

Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.: Cross-modal reassignment. 2021. Available at https://www.britannica.com/science/neuroplasticity/Cross-modal-reassignment. Accessed January 31, 2023.

Waldert S: Invasive vs. non-invasive neuronal signals for brain-machine interfaces: Will one prevail? Front Neurosci. 2016. Available at https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2016.00295/full. Accessed January 31, 2023.

Dipalo M, Amin H, Lovato L, et al.: Intracellular and extracellular recording of spontaneous action potentials in mammalian neurons and cardiac cells with 3D plasmonic nanoelectrodes. Nano Lett. 2017; 17: 3932-3939.

Nikokriegeskorte, Open Brain Science: From bidirectional brain-computer interfaces toward neural co-processors. 2019. Available at https://nikokriegeskorte.org/2019/01/26/from-bidirectional-brain-computer-interfaces-toward-neural-co-processors/. Accessed January 31, 2023.

Hughes C, Herrera A, Gaunt R, et al.: Chapter 13–Bidirectional brain-computer interfaces. In Handbook of Clinical Neurology. Available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/handbook/handbook-ofclinical-neurology/vol/168/suppl/C. Accessed January 31, 2023.

Siuly S, Li Y, Zhang Y: Electroencephalogram (EEG) and its background. In EEG Signal Analysis and Classification. Springer, Cham: Health Information Science, 2016.

Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research (MFMER): EEG (electroencephalogram). 2021. Available at https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/eeg/about/pac-20393875. Accessed January 31, 2023.

Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Business case for safety and health. 2021. Available at https://www.osha.gov/businesscase. Accessed January 31, 2023.

National Safety Council: Injury facts. 2021. Available at https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/#:~:text=Related%20Deaths%20%26%20Injuries-,In%202021%2C%2061%2C105%20weather%20events%20resulted%20in%20974%20deaths%20and,Learn%20more...&text=The%20number%20of%20deaths%20for%20November%202022%20are%20estimated%20to%20be%203%2C890.,-This%20preliminary%20estimate. Accessed January 31, 2023.

Gaul V: Brain computer interface market by type (invasive BCI, non-invasive BCI and partially invasive BCI), application (communication & control, healthcare, smart home control, entertainment & gaming, and others): Global opportunity analysis and industry forecast, 2020–2027. Allied Market Research. 2021.