Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic response on the Emergency Medical Services workforce, Texas, USA

Maria Mendez; Jennifer A. Horney

doi:10.5055/jem.0761

Authors

Maria Mendez https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1599-0310
Jennifer A. Horney, PhD, MPH https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3060-0894

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.0761

Keywords:

Emergency Medical Services, COVID-19, mental health, emergency response, stressors

Abstract

Introduction: The physical and mental health impacts of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) response on healthcare workers has been extensively studied; less is known about impacts specific to the prehospital Emergency Medical Service’s (EMS) workforce. However, given data about the physical and psychological impacts to EMS workers participating in prior emergencies and disasters, the response to the COVID-19 pandemic likely increased risk among the EMS workforce.

Methods: EMS agencies in the State of Texas were stratified according to agency structure, eg, fire-based, nonfire-based governmental, hospital-based private, nonhospital-based private, and other. A systematic sample of 10 agencies was selected from each of the five strata. An interview guide was developed to collect information about prior experience with disaster or emergency response, professional roles since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, and alternations to professional roles and EMS systems during both prior responses and the COVID-19 response. Interviews were transcribed and inductively coded to identify themes.

Results: Five themes were identified in qualitative interviews. These included 1) early pandemic lessons, 2) protocol changes, 3) personal stressors, 4) professional stressors, and 5) lessons learned. Increased workloads, operational changes, fear of transmission to friends and family, and fatigue from working conditions were emphasized by participants. However, adaptations are being identified that could help EMS agencies and their workforces maintain resilience, even during an ongoing emergency response.

Discussion: The COVID-19 response created unique professional and personal stressors to the EMS workforce and limited access to coping mechanisms previously used to reduce stress. Targeted studies are needed to guide the implementation of evidence-based interventions to protect the well-being of EMS personnel now and during future public health emergency and disaster responses.

Author Biographies

Maria Mendez

School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas

Jennifer A. Horney, PhD, MPH

Epidemiology Program, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware

References

Federal Interagency Committee on Emergency Medical Services: 2011 National EMS Assessment. US Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT HS 811 723, Washington, DC. Published 2012. Available at www.ems.gov. Accessed December 22, 2021.

HealthIT.gov: Emergency Medical Services and Emergency Preparedness. Published 2019. Available at https://www.healthit.gov/topic/health-it-health-care-settings/emergency-medical-servicesemergency-preparedness. Accessed December 22, 2021.

US Department of Health and Human Services: COVID-19 Public Health and Medical Emergency Declarations and Waivers, National Emergency, March 2020. Published 2021. Available at https://www.phe.gov/emergency/events/COVID19/Pages/2019-Public-Healthand-Medical-Emergency-Declarations-and-Waivers.aspx. Accessed December 22, 2021.

Jaffe E, Strugo R, Bin E, et al.: The role of emergency medical services in containing COVID-19. Am J Emerg. 2020; 38(7): 1526-1527. DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2020.04.023.

Lerner EB, Newgard CD, Mann NC: Effect of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the US Emergency Medical Services System: A preliminary report. Acad Emerg Med. 2020; 27(8): 693-699. DOI:10.1111/acem.14051.

Ehrlich H, McKenney M, Elkbuli A: Defending the front lines during the COVID-19 pandemic: Protecting our first responders and emergency medical service personnel. Am J Emerg. 2021; 40: 213-214. DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2020.05.068.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Framework for Expanding EMS System Capacity during Medical Surge. Published 2016. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/cpr/readiness/healthcare/documents/ExpandingEMSSystem.docx. Accessed December 22, 2021.

Kshtriya S, Kobezak HM, Popok P, et al.: Social support as a mediator of occupational stressors and mental health outcomes in first responders. J Community Psychol. 2020; 48(7): 2252-2263. DOI:10.1002/jcop.22403.

Anderson GS, Ricciardelli R, Tam-Seto L, et al.: Self-reported coping strategies for managing work-related stress among public safety personnel. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(4): 2355. DOI:10.3390/ijerph19042355.

Boland LL, Mink PJ, Kamrud JW, et al.: Social support outside the workplace, coping styles, and burnout in a cohort of EMS providers from Minnesota. Workplace Health Saf. 2019; 67(8): 414-422. DOI:10.1177/2165079919829154.

Alexander DA, Klein S: First responders after disasters: A review of stress reactions, at-risk, vulnerability, and resilience factors. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2009; 24(2): 87-94. DOI:10.1017/S1049023X00006610.

Benedek DM, Fullerton C, Ursano RJ: First responders: Mental health consequences of natural and human-made disasters for public health and public safety workers. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007; 21; 28: 55-68. DOI:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144037.

Haugen PT, Evces M, Weiss DS: Treating posttraumatic stress disorder in first responders: A systematic review. Clin Psychol Review. 2012; 32(5): 370-380. DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2012.04.001.

Smith EC, Holmes L, Burkle FM: The physical and mental health challenges experienced by 9/11 first responders and recovery workers: A review of the literature. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019; 34(6): 625-631. DOI:10.1017/S1049023X19004989.

Naushad VA, Bierens JJ, Nishan KP, et al.: A systematic review of the impact of disaster on the mental health of medical responders. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019; 34(6): 632-643. DOI:10.1017/S1049023X19004874.

d’Ettorre G, Ceccarelli G, Santinelli L, et al.: Post-traumatic stress symptoms in healthcare workers dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. Int J Environ Res. 2021; 18(2): 601. DOI:10.3390/ijerph18020601.

Salari N, Khazaie H, Hosseinian-Far A, et al.: The prevalence of stress, anxiety and depression within front-line healthcare workers caring for COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and metaregression. Hum Resour Health. 2020; 18(1): 1-4. DOI:10.1186/s12960-020-00544-1.

Sheraton M, Deo N, Dutt T, et al.: Psychological effects of the COVID 19 pandemic on healthcare workers globally: A systematic review. Psychiatry Res. 2020; 292: 113360. DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113360.

Marvaldi M, Mallet J, Dubertret C, et al.: Anxiety, depression, trauma-related, and sleep disorders among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021. DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.03.024.

Ardebili ME, Naserbakht M, Bernstein C, et al.: Healthcare providers experience of working during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. Am J Infect Control. 2021; 49(5): 547-554. DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2020.10.001.

Vujanovic AA, Lebeaut A, Leonard S: Exploring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of first responders. Cogn Behav Ther. 2021; 50(4): 320-335. DOI:10.1080/16506073.2021.1874506.

Ventura C, Denton EE, Knauth CM: An overview of Emergency Medical Services pandemic response in the United States and its implications during the era of COVID-19. Available at SSRN 3631136. Accessed June 19, 2020.

Lazarus RS, Folkman S: Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. Springer Publishing Company, New York, NY. 1984; 10: 286-333.

Goh YW, Sawang S, Oei TP: The Revised Transactional Model (RTM) of occupational stress and coping: An improved process approach. Australas. J. Organ. Psychol. 2010; 3: 13-20. DOI:10.1375/ajop.3.1.13.

Usul E, Şan İ, Bekgöz B: The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the anxiety level of Emergency Medical Services professionals. Psychiatr Danub. 2020; 32(3-4): 563-569. DOI:10.24869/psyd.2020.563.

Ilczak T, Rak M, Ćwiertnia M, et al.: Predictors of stress among emergency medical personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2021; 34(2): 139-149. DOI:10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01688.

Meisel ZF, Shea JA, Peacock NJ, et al.: Optimizing the patient handoff between emergency medical services and the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2015; 65(3): 310-317. DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.07.003.

Fernandez R, Lord H, Halcomb E, et al.: Implications for COVID-19: A systematic review of nurses’ experiences of working in acute care hospital settings during a respiratory pandemic. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020; 111: 103637. DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103637.

Nagler RH, Vogel RI, Gollust SE, et al.: Public perceptions of conflicting information surrounding COVID-19: Results from a nationally representative survey of US adults. PLoS ONE. 2020; 15(10): e0240776. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0240776.

Di Trani M, Mariani R, Ferri R, et al.: From resilience to burnout in healthcare workers during the COVID-19 emergency: The role of the ability to tolerate uncertainty. Front Psychol. 2021; 12: 987. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.646435.

Delilah Roque A, Pijawka D, Wutich A: The role of social capital in resiliency: Disaster recovery in Puerto Rico. Risk Hazards Crisis Public Policy. 2020; 11(2): 204-235. DOI:10.1002/rhc3.12187.

Chen R: An exploration of organizational capabilities for emergency response. Proceedings of the Nineteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Chicago, Illinois, August 15-17, 2013. Available at https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/301360157.pdf. Accessed December 22, 2021.

Brandrud AS, Bretthauer M, Brattebø G, et al.: Local emergency medical response after a terrorist attack in Norway: A qualitative study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017; 26(10): 806-816. DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006517.

Owusu-Ansah S, Harris M, Fishe JN, et al.: State emergency medical services guidance and protocol changes in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: A national investigation. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2022; 3(2): e12687. DOI:10.1002/emp2.12687.