Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

The impact of shadow evacuation on evacuation time estimates for nuclear power plants

Kevin Weinisch, PE, Paul Brueckner, BA

Abstract


A shadow evacuation is the voluntary evacuation of people from areas outside a declared evacuation area. Shadow evacuees can congest roadways and inhibit the egress of those evacuating from an area at risk. Federal regulations stipulate that nuclear power plant (NPP) licensees in the United States must conduct an Evacuation Time Estimate (ETE) study after each decennial census. The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) published federal guidance for conducting ETE studies in November 2011. This guidance document recommends the consideration of a Shadow Region which extends 5 miles radially beyond the existing 10-mile Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) for NPPs. The federal guidance also suggests the consideration of the evacuation of 20 percent of the permanent resident population in the Shadow Region in addition to 100 percent of the declared evacuation region within the EPZ when conducting ETE studies. The 20 percent recommendation was questioned in a March 2013 report prepared by the US Government Accountability Office. This article discusses the effects on ETE of increasing the shadow evacuation from 20 to 60 percent for 48 NPPs in the United States. Only five (10 percent) of the 48 sites show a significant increase (30 minutes or greater) in 90th percentile ETE (time to evacuate 90 percent of the population in the EPZ), while seven (15 percent) of the 48 sites show a significant increase in 100th percentile ETE (time to evacuate all population in the EPZ). Study areas that are prone to a significant increase in ETE due to shadow evacuation are classified as one of four types; case studies are presented for one plant of each type to explain why the shadow evacuation significantly affects ETE. A matrix of the four case types can be used by emergency management personnel to predict during planning stages whether the evacuated area is prone to a significant increase in ETE due to shadow evacuation. Potential mitigation tactics that reduce demand (public information) or increase capacity (contraflow, traffic control points, specialized intersection treatments) to offset the impact of shadow evacuation are discussed.


Keywords


shadow evacuation, nuclear evacuation, nuclear power plant, DYNEV, mitigation, traffic control, ETE

Full Text:

PDF

References


Code of Federal Regulations (CFR): 10CFR Part 50, Appendix E—Emergency planning and preparedness for production and utilization facilities, Section IV, Item 4 and Letter D, Item 2. Available at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part050/part050-appe.html. Accessed January 23, 2014.

Jones J, Walton F: Criteria for development of evacuation time estimate studies, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Contractor Report (NUREG/CR-7002). Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories, November 2011.

Jones J, Walton F, Sullivan R: Review of NUREG-0654, Supplement 3, “Criteria for protective action recommendations for severe accidents” focus groups and telephone survey, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Contractor Report (NUREG/CR-6953, Volume 2). Albuquerque, NM, October 2008.

US Government Accountability Office: Emergency preparedness: NRC needs to better understand likely public response to radiological incidents at nuclear power plants. U.S. Government Accountability Office Report GAO-13-243. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office, March 2013.

Wolshon B, Urbina E, Wilmot C, et al.: Review of policies and practices for hurricane evacuation. I: Transportation planning, preparedness, and response. Nat Hazards Rev. 2005; 6(3): 129-142.

Mitchell J, Cutter S, Edmonds A: Improving shadow evacuation management: Case study of the Graniteville, South Carolina, chlorine spill. J Emerg Manage. 2007; 5(1): 1-7.

Dotson LJ, Jones J, Sullivan R: Identification and analysis of factors affecting emergency evacuations, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Contractor Report (NUREG/CR-6864, Volume 1). Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories, January 2005.

NRC Web-Based Agencywide Documents Access and Management System: Chairman Allison M. Macfarlane letter on behalf of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to The Honorable Thomas Carper.

Available at http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1313/ML13133A190.pdf. Accessed June 5, 2013.

Carpender S, Campbell P, Quiram B, et al.: Urban evacuation and rural America: Lessons learned from Hurricane Rita. Public Health Reports. 2006; 121: 775-779.

Wolshon B, Urbina E, Wilmot C, et al.: Review of policies and practices for hurricane evacuation. II: Traffic operations, management, and control. Nat Hazards Rev. 2005; 6(3): 143-161.

Urbanik T, Moeller MP, Barnes K: Benchmark study of the I-DYNEV evacuation time estimate computer code, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Contractor Report (NUREG/CR-4873). Richland, WA: Pacific Northwest Laboratory and Texas Transportation Institute, June 1988.

Urbanik T, Moeller MP, Barnes K: The sensitivity of evacuation time estimates to changes in input parameters for the I-DYNEV computer code, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Contractor Report (NUREG/zCR-4874). Richland, WA: Pacific Northwest Laboratory and Texas Transportation Institute, June 1988.

Transportation Research Board: Highway Capacity Manual for 2010. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, 2010.

NRC Web-Based Agencywide Documents Access and Management System: Indian Point Energy Center development of evacuation time estimates, Appendices B and C. Available at http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1302/ML13023A025.pdf. Accessed January 23, 2014.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.2015.0227

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Journal of Emergency Management