The “judicialization” of emergency management in Belgium: From a safety regime toward a security one

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.0738

Keywords:

emergency management, judicialization, safety, security

Abstract

This paper analyzes changes in emergency management in Belgium that have accompanied growing security concerns in Western countries since the 9/11 terrorist attacks in the United States. Using an instrumentation approach, we show how the adoption of a particular regulatory instrument helped put police and judicial actors center stage and gave a more prominent place to the inquiry. We show how the instrument is hampering cooperation, communication, and trust in rescue services and may undermine the collective intelligence at the core of emergency responses. We argue that these changes are indicators of the rise of a new “emergency management security regime” that contradicts the original safety regime applied since the 1960s.

Author Biographies

Colin Glesner, PhD

Belgian Nuclear Research Center (SCK•CEN), Mol, Belgium; Université de Liège, SPIRAL Research Center, Liège, Belgium

Catherine Fallon, PhD

Professor, Université de Liège, SPIRAL Research Center, Liège, Belgium

References

Commission Attentats: Comptes Rendus Intégraux Des Auditons de la Commission Parlementaire Sur Les Attentats de Bruxelles du 22 Mars 2016. Brussels, Belgium: Federal Parliament, 2016.

Choi B, Pak A: Multidisciplinarity interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. Clin Invest Med. 2006; 29(6): 351-364.

Tierney KJ: Recent developments in US homeland security policies and their implications for the management of extreme events. In Rodriguez H, Quarantelli EL, Dynes RR (eds.): Handbook on Disaster Research. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2007: 405-412.

Waugh WL: Terrorism and the all-hazards model. J Emerg Manag. 2005; 2(1): 8-10.

Bieder C, Pettersen Gould K: The Coupling of Safety and Security Exploring Interrelations in Theory and Practice. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2020.

Glesner C, Geysmans R, Turcanu C: Two sides of the same coin? Exploring the relation between safety and security in high-risk organizations. J Saf Res. 2022; 82: 184-193.

Cambacédès L-P, Chaudet C: The SEMA referential framework: Avoiding equivocations on security and safety issues. Telecom ParisTech. 2010; 14: 55-66.

Dupont I, Reniers GLL: Vergelijkende studie tussen veiligheid en beveiliging: Toepassen van proactieve beschermingsprogramma’s bij kritieke infrastructuren. Econ Manag. 2010; 10: 1-29.

Flory D: Strengthening Nuclear Safety and Security Globally a Continued International Challenge. 2013: 1-8.

Gandhi S, Kang J: Nuclear safety and nuclear security synergy. Ann Nucl Energy. 2013; 60: 357-361.

IAEA: Code of Conduct on the Safety and Security of Radioactive Sources. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency, 2004. 12. IAEA: The Interface Between Safety and Security at Nuclear Power Plants. INSAG-24. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency, 2010.

IAEA: Management of the Interface between Nuclear Safety and Security for Research Reactors. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency, 2016.

IAEA: Management of the Interface between Nuclear Safety and Security for Research Reactors. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency, 2019.

Johnston RG: Adversarial safety analysis: Borrowing the methods of security vulnerability assessments. J Saf Res. 2004; 35: 245-248.

Kim D, Kang J: Where nuclear safety and security meet. Bull At Sci. 2012; 68(1): 86-93.

Kriaa S, Pietre-Cambacedes L, Bouissou M, et al.: A survey of approaches combining safety and security for industrial control systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2015; 139: 156-178.

WENRA: Interfaces Between Nuclear Safety and Nuclear Security. London, UK: Western European Nuclear Regulators Association, 2019.

Hessami AG: A systems framework for safety and security: The holistic paradigm. Syst Eng. 2004; 7(2): 99-112.

Holtrop D, Kretz D: Onderzoek Security & Safety: Een Inventarisatie Van Beleid, Wet-en Regelgeving. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Arcadis, 2008.

Jore SH: The conceptual and scientific demarcation of security in contrast to safety. Eur J Secur Res. 2019; 4: 157-174.

Kriaa S, Pietre-Cambacedes L, Bouissou M, et al.: A survey of approaches combining safety and security for industrial control systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2015; 139: 156-178.

Pietre-Cambacedes L, Chaudet C: The SEMA referential framework: Avoiding ambiguities in the terms “security” and “safety”. Int J Crit Infrastruct Protect. 2010; 3(2): 55-66.

Chen C, Reniers GLL, Khakzad N: Integrating safety and security resources to protect chemical industrial parks from man-made domino effects: A dynamic graph approach. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2019; 191: 106470. DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2019.04.023.

Cusimano J, Byers E: Safety and security: Two sides of the same coin. Control Glob. 2010; 23: 14-15.

Hashim, Awadh G, Razzak B, et al.: Integration of Nuclear Safety, Security and Safeguards Systems. Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates: GNEII Capstone Project, 2011.

Reniers GLL, Cremer K, Buytaert J: Continuously and simultaneously optimizing an organization’s safety and security culture and climate: The improvement diamond for excellence achievement and leadership in safety & security (IDEAL S&S) model. J Clean Prod. 2011; 19: 1239-1249.

Reniers GLL, Dullaert W: Gaining and Sustaining Site-Integrated Safety and Security in Chemical Clusters. Zelzate, Belgium: Nautulus Academic Book, 2007.

Koenick S: Safety and Security Interface. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency, 2011.

La Porte TR: Doing safety . . . and then security: Mixing operational challenges—Preparing to be surprised. In Bieder C, Pettersen Gould K (eds.): The Coupling of Safety and Security. Exploring Interrelations in Theory and Practice. Berlin, Germany: Springer International Publishing, 2020: 74-85.

Pettersen Gould K, Bieder C: Safety and security: The challenges of bringing them together. In Bieder C, Pettersen Gould K (eds.): The Coupling of Safety and Security: Exploring Interrelations in Theory and Practice. Springer International Publishing, 2020: 1-9.

Schulman PR: Safety and security: Managerial tensions and synergies. In Bieder C, Pettersen Gould K (eds.): The Coupling of Safety and Security. Exploring Interrelations in Theory and Practice. Berlin, Germany: Springer International Publishing, 2020: 86-95.

Brooks DJ, Coole M: Divergence of safety and security. In Bieder C, Pettersen Gould K (eds.): The Coupling of Safety and Security. Exploring Interrelations in Theory and Practice. Berlin, Germany: Springer International Publishing, 2020: 62-73.

Lascoumes P: Les instruments d’action publique, traceurs de changement: L’exemple des transformations de la politique française de lutte contre la pollution atmosphérique (1961-2006). Polit Soc. 2007; 26(2–3): 73-89.

Lascoumes P, Le Gales P: Introduction: Understanding public policy through its instruments—From the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation. Governance. 2007; 20(1): 1-21.

De Larrinaga M, Doucet MG: Sovereign power and the biopolitics of human security. Secur Dialogue. 2008; 39(5): 517-537.

Dillon M, Lobo-Guerrero L: Biopolitics of security in the 21st century: An introduction. Rev Int Stud. 2008; 34: 265-292.

Haddow GD, Bullock JA, Coppola DP: Introduction to Emergency Management. 3rd ed. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann Books, 2017.

Rose N, Miller P: Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. Br J Sociol. 2010; 61(1): 271-303.

May PJ, Jochim AE: Policy regime perspectives: Policies, politics, and governing. Policy Stud J. 2013; 41(3): 426-452.

Howlett M: Governance modes, policy regimes and operational plans: A multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design. Policy Sci. 2009; 42: 73-89.

Carter DP, May PJ: Making sense of the US COVID-19 pandemic response: A policy regime perspective. Admin Theory Praxis. 2020; 42(2): 265-277.

Hood C, Rothstein H, Spackman M, et al.: Explaining risk regulation regimes: Exploring the ‘minimal feasible response’ hypothesis. Health Risk Soc. 1999; 1(2): 151-166. DOI: 10.1080/13698579908407015.

Dean M: Introduction: Basic concepts and themes. In Governmentality. Power and Rule in Modern Society. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2010. Available at https://www.schillingcts.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Basic-Concepts-and-Themes-2010-Mitchell-Dean.pdf. Accessed February 17, 2023.

Kassim H, Galès PL: Exploring governance in a multi-level polity: A policy instruments approach. West Eur Polit. 2010; 33(1): 1-21. DOI: 10.1080/01402380903354031.

Law J: Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Syst Pract. 1992; 5(4): 379-393. DOI: 10.1007/BF01059830.

Crawford A, Hutchinson S: Mapping the contours of ‘everyday security’: Time, space and emotion. Br J Criminol. 2015; 56(6): 1-19.

Foucault M: In Bouchard DF (ed.), Language Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews (Simon S, Trans.). Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1997.

Gutting G: Foucault’s genealogical method. Midwest Stud Philos. 1990; 15: 327-343. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4975.1990.tb00221.x.

Brunet S, Fallon C, Ozer P, et al.: Risques, Planification D’urgence et Gestion de Crise. Brussels, Belgium: La Charte, 2018.

Brod M, Tesler LE, Christensen TL: Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Qual Life Res. 2009; 18(9): 1263-1278. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9.

Fusch P, Fusch G, Ness L: Denzin’s paradigm shift: Revisiting triangulation in qualitative research. JOSC. 2018; 10(1): 19-32. DOI: 10.5590/JOSC.2018.10.1.02.

Fusch PI, Ness LR: Are We There Yet? Data Saturation in Qualitative Research. The qualitative report. 2015; 20(9): 1408-1416.

Gouvernement de Belgique: Arrêté Royal Portant Fixation du Plan D’urgence National Relatif à L’approche D’une Prise D’otage Terroriste ou D’un Attentat Terroriste. Brussels, Belgium: Gouvernement de Belgique, 2016.

Gouvernement de Belgique: Arrêté Royal Portant Fixation du Plan D’urgence National Relatif à L’approche D’une Prise D’otage Terroriste ou D’un Attentat Terroriste. Brussels, Belgium: Gouvernement de Belgique, 2020.

Cooper J, Lewis R, Urquhart C: Using participant or nonparticipant observation to explain information behaviour. Inf Res. 2004; 9(4): 1-16.

Braun V, Clarke V: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualit Res Psychol. 2006; 3(2): 77-101.

Braun V, Clarke V: Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2019.

La chambre des représentants de Belgique: Commission d’enquête-attentats Terroristes 22 Mars 2016 Résumé des travaux et recommandations [Emergency Management Debriefing]. Brussels, Belgium: La Chambre des Représentants de Belgique, 2018: 84.

CELINFO: Explosion Rue Léopold à Liège le 27 Janvier 2010 [Power Point], 2010.

Police de Liège: AMOK 13 Décembre 2011. Police de Liège [Emergency Management Debriefing]. Police de Liège, 2012: 23.

van Hasselt S: Pukkelpop festival noodsituatie—18/08/2011 [Emergency management debriefing], 2012: 32.

Gouvernement de Belgique: Loi DU 31 Decembre 1963 Sur LA Protection Civile. Brussels, Belgium: Gouvernement de Belgique, 1963.

Gouvernement de Belgique: Loi Communale du 30 Mars 1836. Brussels, Belgium: Moniteur Belge, 1836. Available at https://unionisme.be/loi_communale.htm. Accessed February 17, 2023.

Beck U, Lash S, Wynne, B: Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London, UK: Sage Publications. 1992; 264.

Kletz TA: The origins and history of loss prevention. Process Saf Environ Prot. 1999; 77(B): 108-115.

Waugh WL, Streib G: Collaboration and leadership for effective emergency management. Public Admin Rev. 2006; 66(1): 131-140.

Jasanoff S: Learning from Disaster: Risk Management after Bhopal. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1994.

Power M: Organized Uncertainty: Designing a World of Risk Management. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2007.

Berg L: Trust in food in the age of mad cow disease: A comparative study of consumers’ evaluation of food safety in Belgium, Britain and Norway. Appetite. 2004; 42: 21-32. DOI: 10.1016/S0195-6663(03)00112-0.

Hansel PA: Mad cow disease—The OR connection. AORN J. 1999; 70(2): 224-238. DOI: 10.1016/S0001-2092(06)62237-0.

Lebailly P: Sécurité alimentaire et crise de la dioxine en Belgique. Sécurité Alimentaire et Crise de La Dioxine En Belgique. 2003: 1000-1008. DOI: 10.1400/32711.

Gouvernement de Belgique: Arrêté Royal Portant Fixation du Plan D’urgence Pour Les Événements et Situations de Crise Nécessitant Une Coordination ou Une Gestion à L’échelon National. Brussels, Belgium: Gouvernement de Belgique, 2003.

Gouvernement de Belgique: Loi Sur la Planification D’urgence du 28 Mars 2003. Brussels, Belgium: Gouvernement de Belgique, 2003.

Gouvernement de Belgique: Circulaire Ministerielle NPU-1 Relative Aux Plans D’urgence et D’intervention. Brussels, Belgium: Gouvernement de Belgique, 2006.

Gouvernement de Belgique: Circulaire Ministérielle NPU-2 Relative au Plan Général D’urgence et D’intervention du Gouverneur de Province. Brussels, Belgium: Gouvernement de Belgique, 2009.

Gouvernement de Belgique: Circulaire Ministerielle NPU-3 Relative a L’approbation Des Plans D’urgence et D’intervention Provinciaux. Brussels, Belgium: Gouvernement de Belgique, 2009.

Gouvernement de Belgique: Circulaire Ministérielle NPU-4 Relative Aux Disciplines. Brussels, Belgium: Gouvernement de Belgique, 2009.

Perry R: Emergency operations centres in an era of terrorism. J Conting Crisis Manag. 2003; 11: 151-159. DOI: 10.1111/j.0966-0879.2003.01104001.x.

Ansell C, Boin A, Keller A: Managing transboundary crises: Identifying the building blocks of an effective response system. J Conting Crisis Manag. 2010; 18(4): 195-207. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5973.2010.00620.x.

Farazmand A: Learning from the Katrina crisis: A global and international perspective with implications for future crisis management. Public Admin Rev. 2007; 67(s1): 149-159. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00824.x.

Heylighen F: Collective intelligence and its implementation on the web: Algorithms to develop a collective mental map. Comput Math Org Theory. 1999; 5(3): 253-280. DOI: 10.1023/A:1009690407292.

Glesner C: La gestion du risque sous tension! L’intellignece collective ou l’émulation sans ingérence. In Brunet S, Fallon C, Ozer P, et al. (eds.): Risques, Planification D’urgence et Gestion de Crise. Brussels, Belgium: La Charte, 2018: 324. Available at https://dial.uclouvain.be/pr/boreal/object/boreal:212476. Accessed February 17, 2023.

Bernard-Bonnin AC, Stachenko S, Bonin D, et al.: Self-management teaching programs and morbidity of pediatric asthma: A meta-analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1995; 95: 34-41.

CIHR: Training Program Grant Guide: Strategic Training Initiative in Health Research. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Institutes of Health Research, 2005. Available at http://www.cihrirsc.gc.ca/e/17948.html. Accessed February 17, 2023.

Gouvernement de Belgique: Arrêté royal du 16 février 2006 relatif aux plans d’urgence et d’intervention. Brussels, Belgium: Gouvernement de Belgique, 2006.

Quarantelli EL, Lagadec P, Boin A: A heuristic approach to future disasters and crises: New, old, and in-between types. In The Handbook on Disaster Research. Rodríguez H, Donner W, Trainor JE (eds.): Basel, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2007: 16-41.

Beck U: The terrorist threat. World risk society revisited. Theory Cult Soc. 2002; 19(4): 39-55.

Bigo D: Security, exception, ban and surveillance. In Lyon D (ed.): Theorizing Surveillance. Cambridge, UK: Willan Püblishing, 2006: 46-68.

Nosengo N: Italian court finds seismologists guilty of manslaughter. Nature. 2012. DOI: 10.1038/nature.2012.11640.

Grose C, Olausson P: Blind spots in interaction between actors in Swedish planning for critical infrastructure protection. Saf Sci. 2019; 118: 424-434.

Department of Homeland Security: DHS Lexicon: Terms and Definitions. New York: Department of Homeland Security, 2007. Available at https://dhsonline.dhs.gov/portal/jhtml/dc/sf.jhtml?doid=52981. Accessed February 17, 2023.

Rodriguez H, Quarantelli EL, Dynes RR: Handbook of Disaster Research. New York: Springer Publishing, 2007.

Published

12/21/2023

How to Cite

Glesner, C., and C. Fallon. “The ‘judicialization’ of Emergency Management in Belgium: From a Safety Regime Toward a Security One”. Journal of Emergency Management, vol. 21, no. 6, Dec. 2023, pp. 539-55, doi:10.5055/jem.0738.