Ocean state rising: Storm simulation and vulnerability mapping to predict hurricane impacts for Rhode Island’s critical infrastructure

Samuel Adams; Austin Becker; Kyle McElroy; Noah Hallisey; Peter Stempel; Isaac Ginis; Deborah Crowley

doi:10.5055/jem.0801

Authors

Samuel Adams, MPA
Austin Becker, PhD https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9224-7913
Kyle McElroy, PE
Noah Hallisey, MS
Peter Stempel, PhD https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0000-4154
Isaac Ginis, PhD https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1074-4308
Deborah Crowley, MS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.0801

Keywords:

hazard impacts, storm consequences, coastal hazards, vulnerability assessment, risk management, decision support tools, participatory action research, implementation research

Abstract

Predicting the consequences of a major coastal storm is increasingly difficult as the result of global climate change and growing societal dependence on critical infrastructure (CI). Past storms are no longer a reliable predictor of future weather events, and the traditional approach to vulnerability assessment presents accumulated loss in largely quantitative terms that lack the specificity local emergency managers need to develop effective plans and mitigation strategies. The Rhode Island Coastal Hazards Modeling and Prediction (RI-CHAMP) system is a geographic information system (GIS)-based modeling tool that combines high-resolution storm simulations with geolocated vulnerability data to predict specific consequences based on local concerns about impacts to CI. This case study discusses implementing RI-CHAMP for the State of Rhode Island to predict impacts of wind and inundation on its CI during a hurricane, tropical storm, or nor’easter. This paper addresses the collection and field verification of vulnerability data, along with RI-CHAMP’s process for integrating those data with storm models. The project deeply engaged end-users (emergency managers, facility managers, and other stakeholders) in developing RI-CHAMP’s ArcGIS Online dashboard to ensure it provides specific, actionable data. The results of real and synthetic storm models are presented along with discussion of how the data in these simulations are being used by state and local emergency managers, facility owners, and others.

Author Biographies

Samuel Adams, MPA

University of Rhode Island, Department of Marine Affairs, Kingston, Rhode Island

Austin Becker, PhD

Associate Professor and Chair of Marine Affairs, University of Rhode Island, Department of Marine Affairs, Kingston, Rhode Island

Kyle McElroy, PE

University of Rhode Island, Department of Marine Affairs, Kingston, Rhode Island

Noah Hallisey, MS

University of Rhode Island, Department of Marine Affairs, Kingston, Rhode Island

Peter Stempel, PhD

Penn State University, College Station, Pennsylvania

Isaac Ginis, PhD

University of Rhode Island, Graduate School of Oceanography, Narragansett, Rhode Island

Deborah Crowley, MS

University of Rhode Island, Graduate School of Oceanography, Narragansett, Rhode Island

References

Godschalk DR, Norton R, Richardson C, et al.: Avoiding coastal hazard areas; best state mitigation practices. Environ Geosci. 2000; 7(1): 13-22.

Balica SF, Wright NG, Van der Meulen F: A flood vulnerability index for coastal cities and its use in assessing climate change impacts. Nat Hazards. 2012; 64(1): 73-105.

Bukvic A, Rohat G, Apotsos A, et al.: A systematic review of coastal vulnerability mapping. Sustainability. 2020; 12: 2822.

Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL: Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q. 2003; 84(2): 242-261.

Ullman DS, Ginis I, Huang W, et al.: Assessing the multiple impacts of extreme hurricanes in Southern new England, USA. Geosciences. 2019; 9(6): 265.

Becker A, Hallisey N, Kalaidjian E, et al.: The hazard consequence prediction system: A participatory action research approach to enhance emergency management. J Homel Secur Emerg Manag. 2022; 19(1): 1-25.

Witkop R, Becker A, Stempel P, et al.: Developing consequence thresholds for storm models through participatory processes: Case study of westerly Rhode Island. Front Earth Sci. 2019; 7. DOI: 10.3389/feart.2019.00133.

Stempel P, Ginis I, Ullman D: Real-time chronological hazard impact modeling. J Mar Sci Eng. 2018; 6(4): 134.

Witkop R, Becker A, Stempel P, et al.: Developing consequence thresholds for storm models through participatory processes: Case study of westerly Rhode Island. Front Earth Sci. 2019; 7: 133.

Ginis I, Kincaid C, Hara T: Modeling the combined coastal and inland hazards from high-impact hypothetical hurricanes. Appendix to the Annual Project Performance Report Prepared for the DHS Coastal Resilience Center, 2017.

Bhattacharyya O, Reeves S, Zwarenstein M: What is implementation research? Rationale, concepts, and practices. Res Soc Work Pract. 2009; 19(5): 491-502.

Eakin H, Luers AL: Assessing the vulnerability of social-environmental systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2006; 31: 365-394.

Maricle GE: Prediction as an impediment to preparedness: Lessons from the US hurricane and earthquake research enterprises. Minerva. 2011; 49(1): 87-111.

McNie EC, Parris A, Sarewitz D: Improving the public value of science: A typology to inform discussion, design and implementation of research. Res Policy. 2016; 45(4): 884-895.

UNDRR: Hazard Definition & Classification Review. Geneva: United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction Geneva. 2020.

Godschalk DR: Urban hazard mitigation: Creating resilient cities. Nat Hazards Rev. 2003; 4(3): 136-143.

Helderop E, Grubesic TH: Hurricane storm surge in Volusia county, Florida: Evidence of a tipping point for infrastructure damage. Disasters. 2019; 43(1): 157-180.

Parker CF, Stern EK, Paglia E, et al.: Preventable catastrophe? The hurricane Katrina disaster revisited. J Contingen Crisis Manag. 2009; 17(4): 206-220.

NIST: Modeling and simulation for emergency response: Workshop report, standards and tools. In Modeling and Simulation for Emergency Response. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2003.

Little RG, Loggins RA, Wallace WA: Building the right tool for the job: Value of stakeholder involvement when developing decision-support technologies for emergency management. Nat Hazards Rev. 2015; 16(4): 5015001.

Haraguchi M, Kim S: Critical infrastructure interdependence in New York City during Hurricane Sandy. Int J Disaster Resilience Built Environ. 2016; 7(2): 133-143.

Blumberg AF, Georgas N, Yin L, et al.: Street-scale modeling of storm surge inundation along the New Jersey Hudson river waterfront. J Atmos Oceanic Technol. 2015; 32(8): 1486-1497.

Ullman DS, Ginis I, Huang W, et al.: Assessing the multiple impacts of extreme hurricanes in Southern new England, USA. Geosciences. 2019; 9(6): 265.

Chen X, Ginis I, Hara T: Sensitivity of offshore tropical cyclone wave simulations to spatial resolution in wave models. JMSE. 2018; 6(4): 116.

Becker AH, Acciaro M, Asariotis R, et al.: A note on climate change adaptation for seaports: A challenge for global ports, a challenge for global society. Clim Change. 2013; 120(4): 683-695.

Boin A, McConnell A: Preparing for critical infrastructure breakdowns: The limits of crisis management and the need for resilience. J Contingen Crisis Manag. 2007; 15(1): 50-59.

Cutter SL, Emrich CT, Morath DP, et al.: Integrating social vulnerability into federal flood risk management planning. J Flood Risk Manag. 2013; 6(4): 332-344.

Hinojos S: Social and Environmental Vulnerability to Flooding: Investigating Cross-Scale Hypotheses. University Park: P.S. University, 2022.

Peters DH, Adam T, Alonge O, et al.: Implementation research: What it is and how to do it. BMJ. 2013; 347: f6753.

Cantor A, Kiparsky M, Hubbard SS, et al.: Making a water data system responsive to information needs of Dec. Front Clim. 2021; 3. DOI: 10.3389/fclim.2021.761444.

USACE: Integrated Feasibility Report and Environmental Assessment (IFR/EA). In Feasibility Study for the Rhode Island Coastline (RIC Study). Washington, DC: U.A.C.o.E. (USACE), 2022.

Dietrich JC, Zijlema M, Westerink JJ, et al.: Modeling hurricane waves and storm surge using integrally-coupled, scalable computations. Coastal Eng. 2011; 58(1): 45-65.

Luettich RA, Westerink JJ, Scheffner NW: ADCIRC: An Advanced Three-Dimensional Circulation Model for Shelves, Coasts, and Estuaries. Report 1: Theory and Methodology of ADCIRC-2DD1 and ADCIRC-3DL. Mississippi: Coastal Engineering Research Center (US), 1992.

Allen TR, Sanchagrin S, McLeo G: Visualization for hurricane storm surge risk awareness and emergency communication. In Tiefenbacher JP (ed.): Approaches to Disaster Management—Examining the Implications of Hazards, Emergencies and Disasters. IntechOpen, 2013.

McGrath H, Jabari S: Current Limitations and Emerging Trends in Real-Time Mapping of Natural Disasters and the Emergence of Disaster Dashboards for Communicating Risk. Brussels, Belgium: IGARSS, 2021: 512-515.

Tufte ER: Visual Explanations: Images and Quantities, Evidence and Narrative. Cheshire, Conn.: Graphics Press, 1997.

Smallman HS, John MST: Naive realism: Misplaced faith in realistic displays. Ergonom Des. 2005; 13(3): 6-13.

Siverd CG, Hagen SC, Bilskie MV, et al.: Hydrodynamic storm surge model simplification via application of land to water isopleths in coastal Louisiana. Coastal Eng. 2018; 137: 28-42.