Public transit and crisis communication for critical populations: A content analysis of web-based communication strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.0753

Keywords:

crisis communication, coronavirus disease 2019, public transportation, people with disabilities, racial/ethnic minority, content analysis

Abstract

In the United States, selected subgroups of historically marginalized populations include people with disabilities and people in racial/ethnic minority groups (“critical populations”) who have been disproportionately affected by COVID-19. These groups are also more likely to use public transit to access essential resources; thus, understanding transit agencies’ communication strategies to reach these populations during crises is of utmost importance. We conducted a content analysis of 16 transit agencies’ webpages and Twitter® accounts during the first 6 months of the pandemic to assess alignment of agencies’ COVID-19-related communications with best practices in crisis communication across five themes: perceivability, navigability, understandability, suitability, and content. Findings suggested that transit agencies frequently communicated about schedule changes and safety, eg, masking, station sanitation, and reflected racial/ethnic diversity in images. Yet, less than half consistently used communication strategies known to enhance accessibility and uptake of messaging among critical populations, eg, alternative text, and even less reflected disability diversity in images. We offer recommendations for public transit agencies to move beyond compliance to effectively address the needs of ridership most substantially impacted by public health emergencies.

Author Biographies

Jessica L. Franks, MPH, CHES

School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia

Erin Vinoski Thomas, PhD, MPH, MCHES

Center for Leadership in Disability, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia

References

World Health Organization: Social determinants of health: The solid facts. Available at https://www.who.int/health-topics/socialdeterminants-of-health#tab=tab_1. Accessed September 5, 2020.

Syed ST, Gerber BS, Sharp LK: Traveling towards disease: Transportation barriers to health care access. J Community Health. 2013; 38(5): 976-993.

Wallace R, Hughes-Cromwick P, Mull H, et al.: Access to health care and nonemergency medical transportation: Two missing links. Transp Res Rec. 2005; 1924(1): 76-84.

Government Services Administration: IT accessibility laws and policies. 2022. Available at https://www.section508.gov/manage/laws-and-policies/#:~:text=Section%20508%20of%20the%20Rehabilitation,accessible%20to%20people%20with%20disabilities. Accessed September 24, 2022.

DeWeese J, Hawa L, Demyk H, et al.: A tale of 40 cities: A preliminary analysis of equity impacts of COVID-19 service adjustments across North America. Findings. 2020. DOI: 10.32866/001c.13395.

National Library of Medicine: Health literacy. n.d. Available at https://nnlm.gov/initiatives/topics/health-literacy. Accessed September 5, 2020.

Burrows M, Burd C, McKenzie B: Commuting by public transportation in the United States: 2019. American Community Survey Reports. US Census Bureau, 2021.

Anderson M: Who relies on public transit in the US. Pew Research Center, 2016.

Tan S, Fowers A, Keating D, et al.: Amid the pandemic, public transit is highlighting inequalities in cities. Washington Post. May 15, 2020.

Bezyak JL, Sabella SA, Gattis RH: Public transportation: An investigation of barriers for people with disabilities. J Disabil Policy Stud. 2017; 28(1): 52-60.

Millett GA, Jones AT, Benkeser D, et al.: Assessing differential impacts of COVID-19 on black communities. Ann Epidemiol. 2020; 47: 37-44.

National Council on Disability: The impact of COVID-19 on people with disabilities. Available at https://ncd.gov/sites/default/files/NCD_COVID-19_Progress_Report_508.pdf. Accessed July 26, 2022.

Pace: Safe, essential, transparent: Information about pace’s response to coronavirus (COVID-19). Available at https://www.pacebus.com/news/information-about-paces-response-coronaviruscovid-19. Accessed December 27, 2021.

: SF Bay Area: Coronavirus transportation impacts. Available at https://511.org/alerts/emergencies/coronavirus. Accessed September 5, 2020.

Regional Transportation District: Access-a-ride COVID-19 information. Available at https://www.rtd-denver.com/news-stop/news/access-ride-covid-19-information. Accessed September 5, 2020.

Steward J: The coronavirus has highlighted transit inequalities in America. Marketplace. Available at https://www.marketplace.org/2020/07/01/the-coronavirus-has-highlighted-the-transit-inequalities-in-america/. Accessed September 5, 2020.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Addressing gaps in health care for individuals with intellectual disabilities. Presentation to public health grand rounds. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/grand-rounds/pp/2019/20191015-intellectual-disabilities.html. Accessed September 5, 2020.

Diers-Lawson A: Crisis Communication: Managing Stakeholder Relationships. London: Routledge, 2019.

Savoia E, Lin L, Viswanath K: Communications in public health emergency preparedness: A systematic review of the literature. Biosecur Bioterror. 2013; 11(3): 170-184.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Crisis and emergency risk communication (CERC). Available at https://emergency.cdc.gov/cerc/manual/index.asp. Accessed September 5, 2020.

Ozanne LK, Ballantine PW, Mitchell T: Investigating the methods and effectiveness of crisis communication. J Nonprofit Public Sec Mark. 2020; 32(4): 379-405.

Cheng Y: How social media is changing crisis communication strategies: Evidence from the updated literature. J Contingencies Crisis Man. 2018; 26(1): 58-68.

Statewide Independent Living Council: Defining Mobility and the goal for SILCGA. Available at https://www.silcga.org/mobility/. Accessed July 26, 2022.

National Aging and Disability Transportation Center: Transit accessibility for people with disabilities. Available at https://www.nadtc.org/news/blog/transit-accessibility-for-people-with-disabilities/. Accessed July 26, 2022.

Pleasant A, Rudd RE, O’Leary C, et al.: Considerations for a New Definition of Health Literacy. National Academy of Medicine Discussion Paper, 2016. Available at https://nam.edu/considerationsfor-a-new-definition-of-health-literacy/. Accessed September 5, 2020.

Neuhauser L, Ivey SL, Huang D, et al.: Availability and readability of emergency preparedness materials for deaf and hard-of-hearing and older adult populations: Issues and assessments. PLoS One. 2013; 8(2): e55614.

Smith BG, Krishna A, Smith SB: Relational immunity? Examining relationship as crisis shield. J Contingencies Crisis Manag. 2021; 29(1): 89-98.

Fortunato JA: Understanding a non-causality crisis response: Examining the Florida panthers response to hurricane Irma. Public Relat Rev. 2018; 44(5): 776-783.

Coombs WT: Choosing the right words: The development of guidelines for the selection of the “appropriate” crisis-response strategies. Manag Commun Q. 1995; 8(4): 447-476.

Coombs WT: Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corp Reput Rev. 2007; 10(3): 163-176.

Bandura A: Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In Bryant J, Zillman D (eds.): Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2001: 121-153.

Bandura A: Social cognitive theory and exercise of control over HIV infection. In DiClemente RJ, Peterson JL (eds.): Preventing AIDS: Theories and Methods of Behavioral Interventions. New York: Plenum Press, 1994: 25-29.

Liu W: Disaster communication ecology in multiethnic communities: Understanding disaster coping and community resilience from a communication resource approach. J Int Intercult Commun. 2022; 15(1): 94-117.

Vaismoradi M, Turunen H: Terese bondas ‘content analysis and thematic analysis’: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci. 2013; 15(3): 398-405.

Giorgi S, Guntuku SC, Rahman M, et al.: Twitter corpus of the #blacklivesmatter movement and counter protests: 2013 to 2020. arXiv:2009.00596. 2020.

American Public Transit Association: First quarter ridership report. 2020. Available at https://www.apta.com/wp-content/uploads/2020-Q1-Ridership-APTA.pdf. Accessed September 5, 2020.

Martínez-Rojas M, del Carmen Pardo-Ferreira M, Rubio-Romero JC: Twitter as a tool for the management and analysis of emergency situations: A systematic literature review. Int J Inform Manag. 2018; 43: 196-208.

Cottrill C, Gault P, Yeboah G, et al.: Tweeting transit: An examination of social media strategies for transport information management during a large event. Transport Res C Emerg Technol. 2017; 77: 421-432.

Web Accessibility Initiative: W3C web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG). Available at https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/. Accessed September 5, 2020.

US Access Board: Appendix D to part 1194: Electronic and information technology accessibility standards as originally published on December 21. Revised section 508 accessibility standards. 2000. Available at https://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-andstandards/communications-and-it/about-the-ict-refresh/final-rule/text-of-the-standards-and-guidelines. Accessed September 5, 2020.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, & Medicine: Communicating with vulnerable populations tip sheet. Available at https://www.nap.edu/catalog/22845/communication-with-vulnerable-populations-a-transportation-and-emergency-managementtoolkit. Accessed September 5, 2020.

Janesick VJ: Peer debriefing. In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. New York: Wiley, 2007.

Lincoln YS, Guba EG: Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1985.

Cohen J: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. London: Routledge, 2013.

Kincaid JP, Fishburne RP Jr, Rogers RL, et al.: Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, fog count and flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel. Naval Technical Training Command Millington TN Research Branch, 1975.

Buller MK, Andersen PA, Bettinghaus EP, et al.: Randomized trial evaluating targeted photographic health communication messages in three stigmatized populations: Physically-disabled, senior, and overweight/obese individuals. J Health Commun. 2018; 23(10-11): 886-898.

Plain Language Action and Information Network: Federal plain language guidelines. Available at https://plainlanguage.gov/guidelines/. Accessed September 5, 2020.

Plain Language Action and Information Network: Checklist for plain language on the web. Available at https://plainlanguage.gov/resources/checklists/web-checklist/. Accessed September 5, 2020.

Chung S, Gardner AH, Schonfeld DJ, et al.: Addressing children’s needs in disasters: A regional pediatric tabletop exercise. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2018; 12(5): 582-586.

Hipper TJ, Davis R, Massey PM, et al.: The disaster information needs of families of children with special healthcare needs: A scoping review. Health Secur. 2018; 16(3): 178-192.

So M, Franks JL, Cree RA, et al.: An evaluation of the literacy demands of online natural disaster preparedness materials for families. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020; 14(4): 449-458.

Vaughan E, Tinker T: Influenza preparedness and response for vulnerable populations. Am J Public Health. 2009; 99(S2): 331-332.

Wang Y, Hao H, Platt LS: Examining risk and crisis communications of government agencies and stakeholders during early-stages of COVID-19 on twitter. Comput Hum Behav. 2021; 114: 106568.

Pender B, Currie G, Delbosc A, et al.: Social media use during unplanned transit network disruptions: A review of literature. Transp Rev. 2014; 34(4): 501-521.

Wang Z, Ye X, Tsou MH: Spatial, temporal, and content analysis of twitter for wildfire hazards. Nat Hazards. 2016; 83(1): 523-540.

Health Freedom Defense Fund, Inc.: Daza, Pope v. Biden: US District Court, Middle District of Florida Tampa Division. Available at https://ecf.flmd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2021-01693-53-8-cv. Accessed May 5, 2022.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Requirement for face masks on public transportation conveyances and at transportation hubs. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/travelers/face-masks-public-transportation.html. Accessed May 5, 2022.

Tanne JH: COVID-19: Mask mandate is struck down although US cases are rising. BMJ. 2022; 377: o998.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: CDC mask order remains in effect and CDC realigns travel health notice system [press release]. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2022/s0413-mask-order.html. Accessed May 5, 2022.

DiPetrillo S, Lubin A, Loukaitou-Sideris A, et al.: Improving pathways to fixed-route transit: Transit agency practices to expand access for all users. Transp Res Rec. 2018; 2672(8): 578-587.

Graneheim UH, Lundman B: Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures, and measure to achieve trustworthiness. Nurs Educ Today. 2004; 24: 105-112.

Published

04/01/2024

How to Cite

Franks, J. L., and E. V. Thomas. “Public Transit and Crisis Communication for Critical Populations: A Content Analysis of Web-Based Communication Strategies During the COVID-19 Pandemic”. Journal of Emergency Management, vol. 22, no. 2, Apr. 2024, pp. 195-12, doi:10.5055/jem.0753.