Considering collaborative incident management: A study of the COVID-19 response and initial recovery in a rural West Virginia community
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.0816Keywords:
collaboration, emergency management, incident management, leadershipAbstract
Hierarchical command-style structures are commonplace in the management of disasters, though researchers have begun to recommend the exploration of networked approaches to incident management. Furthermore, few studies are explicitly looking at the rural context of disaster management. This study seeks to contribute to both topics by examining the motivations for emergent collaboration in the direction of the response and initial recovery to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in a rural West Virginia community. Between March 2020 and March 2022, the primary investigator moderated regular briefings of a community task force convened to coordinate the pandemic response and recovery. As regular operations concluded, members completed a survey, and 10 randomly selected members participated in semistructured interviews regarding their experiences in the task force. Survey responses suggest that common motivations for collaboration in nondisaster contexts (as they appear in the scholarly literature) and potential benefits of networked approaches highlighted in the incident management literature could also serve as motivators within the disaster context. Qualitative interview data extend that discussion and identify the need to gain clear information regarding the concerned authorities and specific local information to better inform the expenditure of limited resources as two additional motivators for collaboration.
References
NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information: US billion-dollar weather and climate disasters. Available at https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/billions/. Accessed September 1, 2022.
Montano S: Disasterology: Dispatches from the Front Lines of the Climate Crisis. Toronto: Park Row Books, 2021.
Janssen M, van der Voort H: Agile and adaptive governance in crisis response: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Inform Manag. 2020; 55: 102180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102180
Hobbs A: The colonial pipeline hack: Exposing vulnerabilities in US cybersecurity. Sage Bus Cases. 2021; DOI: 10.4135/9781529789768. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529789768
US Dept of Homeland Security: National Incident Management System. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: US Dept of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2017.
Smith DJ, Sutter D: Response and recovery after the Joplin tornado: Lessons applied and lessons learned. Independ Rev. 2013; 18(2): 165-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2261353
Buck DA, Trainor JE, Aguirre BE: A critical evaluation of the incident command system and NIMS. J Homeland Secur Emerg Manag. 2006; 3(3): 1-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1252
Molino LN: Emergency Incident Management Systems: Fundamentals and Applications. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2006.
Chang R: A literature review and analysis of the incident command system. Int J Emerg Manag. 2017; 13(1): 50-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEM.2017.081193
Grint K: Problems, problems, problems: The social construction of ‘leadership’. Hum Relat. 2005; 58(11): 1467-1494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726705061314
McGuire M, Silvia C: The effect of problem severity, managerial and organizational capacity, and agency structure on intergovernmental collaboration: Evidence from local emergency management. Public Adm Rev. 2010; 70(2): 279-288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02134.x
Brennan MA, Flint CG: Uncovering the hidden dimensions of rural disaster mitigation: Capacity building through community emergency response teams. Southern Rural Sociol. 2007; 22(2): 111-126.
Pilemalm S, Stenberg R, Andersson Granberg T: Emergency response in rural areas. Int J Inform Syst Crisis Response Manag. 2013; 5(2): 19-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/jiscrm.2013040102
Pyles L, Svistova J, Ahn S, et al.: Citizen participation in disaster recovery projects and programmes in rural communities: A comparison of the Haiti earthquake and Hurricane Katrina. Disasters. 2018; 42(3): 498-518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12260
Reinke AJ, Kim JJ, Eldridge ER: The March 2020 Tennessee tornadoes: Risk perceptions, preparedness, and communication. Natural Hazards Center Weather Ready Research Report Series. 2022. Available at https://hazards.colorado.edu/weather-readyresearch/the-march-2020-tennessee-tornados-risk-perceptions-preparedness-and-communication. Accessed May 12, 2022.
James EK, Bokemper SE, Gerber AS, et al.: Persuasive messaging to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake intentions. Vaccine. 2021; 39(3): 7158-7165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.10.039
Nan X: Public health messaging during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: Lessons from communication science. Health Commun. 2022; 37(1): 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1994910
Al-Omoush KS, Ribeiro-Navarrete S, Lassala C, et al.: Networking and knowledge creation: Social capital and collaborative innovation in responding to the COVID-19 crisis. J Innov Know. 2022; 7(2): 100181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100181
Page-Tan C, Marion S, Aldrich D, et al.: Social capital and the COVID-19 pandemic: A preliminary qualitative analysis. Natural Hazards Center Quick Response Grant Report Series. 2021: 335. Available at https://hazards.colorado.edu/quick-response-resport/social-capital-and-the-covid-19-pandemic. Accessed April 15, 2022.
Ansell C, Sorensen E, Torfing J: The COVID-19 pandemic as a game changer for public administration and leadership? The need for robust governance responses to turbulent problems. Pub Manag Rev. 2021; 23(7): 949-960. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1820272
Hu Q, Liu Y: Crisis management and national responses to COVID-19: Global perspectives. Pub Perform Manag Rev. 2022; 45: 737-750. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2022.2079692
McGuirk P, Dowling R, Maalsen S, et al.: Urban governance innovation and COVID-19. Geograph Res. 2021; 59(2): 188-195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12456
Dirani K, Abadi M, Alizadeh A, et al.: Leadership competencies and the essential role of human resource development in times of crisis: A response to COVID-19 pandemic. Hum Resour Dev Int. 2020; 23(4): 380-394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2020.1780078
Harris A: COVID-19: School leadership in crisis? J Prof Cap Community. 2020; 5(3/4): 321-326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-06-2020-0045
Harris A, Jones M: COVID-19: School leadership in disruptive times. Sch Leadersh Manag. 2020; 40(4): 243-247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2020.1811479
Chen JKC, Sriphon T: Perspective on COVID-19 pandemic factors impacting organizational leadership. Sustainability. 2021; 13(6): 3230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063230
Uhl-Bien M: Complexity and COVID-19: Leadership and followership in a complex world. J Manag Stud. 2021; 58(5): 1400-1404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12696
Davis M, Dedon L, Hoffman S, et al.: Emergency powers and the pandemic: Reflecting on state legislative reforms and the future of public health response. J Emerg Manag. 2023; 21(7): 19-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.0772
Liu L, Wu W, McEntire DA: Six Cs of pandemic emergency management: A case study of Taiwan’s initial response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2021; 64: 102516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102516
Johnson K, Biddell CB, Hecht HK, et al.: Organizational decision-making during COVID-19: A qualitative analysis of the organizational decision-making system in the United States during COVID-19. J Contingencies Crisis Manag. 2023; 31(2): 259-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12437
Renger R: COVID-19: Exposing the need for emergency management to invest in systems thinking. J Emerg Manag. 2021; 19(7): 39-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.0607
Lee A, Upton L, Denham MA, et al.: COVID-19 data driven planning: The South East Texas approach. J Emerg Manag. 2022; 20(7): 39-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.0642
Savitt A, Gerber-Chavez L, Montano S, et al.: Emergency management pandemic planning: An analysis of state emergency plans. J Emerg Manag. 2023; 21(7): 97-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.0667
Louis-Charles H, Teron L, Douglas-Glenn NE, et al.: Unmasking disaster disparities and inequality in local emergency management. In Harper-Anderson EL, Albanese JS, Gooden ST (eds.): Racial Equity, COVID-19, and Public Policy. New York: Routledge, 2023: Chapter 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003286967-2
Slobodin O, Cohen O: A culturally-competent approach to emergency management: What lessons can we learn from the COVID-19? Psychol Trauma Theory Res Practice Policy. 2020; 12(5): 470-473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000790
Lee J, Bissell K: Assessing COVID-19 vaccine misinformation interventions among rural, suburban, and urban residents. Natural Hazards Center Quick Response Grant Report Series. 2022: 342. Available at https://hazards.colorado.edu/quick-response-report/assessing-covid-19-vaccine-misinformation-interventions-amongrural-suburban-and-urban-residents. Accessed April 18, 2022.
Page-Tan C, Buhler-Corbin T: Protective policies for all? An analysis of COVID-19 deaths and protective policies among low-, medium-, and high-vulnerability groups. Disasters. 2021; 45(S1): S119-S145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12525
Antonsen S, Haavik TK, Frykmer T, et al.: Structures for collaboration and networked adaptation: Emerging themes from the COVID-19 pandemic. J Emerg Manag. 2023; 21(7): 71-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.0705
Miller LM: Disaster preparedness and mitigation. In Goreham GA (ed.): Encyclopedia of Rural America: The Land and People: Vol. 1. Millerton, NY: Grey House Publishing, 2008: 270-273.
US Dept of Homeland Security: Homeland Security Presidential Directive-5. Washington, DC: US Dept of Homeland Security, 2003.
Cole D: The incident command system: A 25-year evaluation by California practitioners [applied research project, national fire academy executive fire officer program]. 2000. Available at https://www.alnap.org/system/files/content/resource/files/main/efo31023.pdf. Accessed July 1, 2022.
Howitt AM, Leonard HBD: A command system for all agencies? Crisis Response J. 2005; 1(2): 40-42.
Wenger D, Quarantelli EL, Dynes RR: Is the incident command system a plan for all seasons and emergency situations? Hazard Monthly. March 10, 1990.
Bryson JM, Crosby BC, Stone M: The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Adm Rev. 2006; 66(1): 44-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x
Morse RS: Integrative public leadership: Catalyzing collaboration to create public value. Leadersh Q. 2010; 21(2): 231-245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.01.004
Korosec RL, Mead TD: Lessons from privatization task forces: Comparative case studies. Policy Stud J. 1996; 24(4): 641-648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1996.tb01653.x
Haim D, Ravanilla N, Sexton R: Sustained government engagement improves subsequent risk reporting in conflict zones. Am Polit Sci Rev. 2021; 115(2): 717-724. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420001148
Burke CS, Diaz Granados D, Salas E: Team leadership: A review and look ahead. In Bryman A, Collinson D, Grint K, et al. (eds.): The Sage Handbook of Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2011: 338-351.
Zaccaro SJ, Rittman AL, Marks MA: Team leadership. Leadersh Q. 2001; 12: 451-483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(01)00093-5
DeSisto M, Cavanagh J, Bartram T: Bushfire investigations in Australia: A case for building collective leadership practices for crisis events. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 2019; 41(2): 177-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-07-2018-0270
Carson JB, Tesluk PE, Marrone JA: Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Acad Manag J. 2007; 50(5): 1217-1234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.20159921
Lambert L: A framework for shared leadership. Educ Leadersh. 2002; 59(8): 37-40.
Margolis JA, Ziegert JC: Vertical flow of collectivistic leadership: An examination of the cascade of visionary leadership across levels. Leadersh Q. 2016; 27: 334-348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.01.005
Uhl-Bien M: Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. Leadersh Q. 2006; 17: 654-676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.007
Harvey JW, Lathan CA, McDonald HT: Building a common operating picture via a community task force during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int Public Saf J. 2023; 9: 61-100.
Kapucu K: Disaster and emergency management systems in urban areas. Cities. 2012; 29: S41-S49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2011.11.009
Hanifen RW: Enhancing collaboration between fire departments and emergency-management agencies (EMAs) in disaster management: Incident command system (ICS) versus collaboration theory. Int Fire Serv J Leadersh Manag. 2017; 11: 81-91.
Uitdewilligen S, Waller MJ: Information sharing and decision-making in multidisciplinary crisis management teams. J Organ Behav. 2018; 39: 731-748. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2301
Waring S, Moran JL, Page R: Decision-making in multi-agency multiteam systems operating in extreme environments. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2020; 93: 629-653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12309
Harvey JW: Understanding Disaster Recovery: An Exploratory Study Investigating the Role of Shared Leadership During Post-Disaster Periods [dissertation]. Charleston, WV: University of Charleston, 2017.
McKinney K: Moment of Truth: The Nature of Catastrophes and How to Prepare for Them. New York: Savio Republic, 2018.
Smith D: The Elephant in the Room: How Relationships Make or Break the Success of Leaders and Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2011.
Bennett KJ, Borders TF, Holmes GM, et al.: What is rural? Challenges and implications of definitions that inadequately encompass rural people and places. Health Aff. 2019; 38(12): 1985-1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00910
Halfacree KH: Locality and social representation: Space, discourse and alternative definitions of the rural. J Rural Stud. 1993; 9(1): 23-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0743-0167(93)90003-3
Agarwal S, Rahman S, Errington A: Measuring the determinants of relative economic performance of rural areas. J Rural Stud. 2009; 25: 309-321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.02.003
Brown DG, Johnson KM, Loveland TR, et al.: Rural land-use trends in the conterminous United States, 1950-2000. Ecol Appl. 2005; 15(6): 1851-1863. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/03-5220
Chen H, Tang L, Qui Q, et al.: Coupling between rural development and ecosystem services, the case of Fujian province, China. Sustainability. 2018; 10(524): 524. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020524
Crouch M, Nguyen TD: Examining teacher characteristics, school conditions, and attrition rates at the intersection of school choice and rural education. J Sch Choice. 2021; 15(2): 268-294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2020.1736478
Nguyen TD: Examining the teacher labor market in different rural contexts: Variations by urbanicity and rural states. AERA Open. 2020; 6(4): 233285842096633-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420966336
Inagami S, Gao S, Karimi H, et al.: Adapting the index of relative rurality (IRR) to estimate rurality at the zip code level: A rural classification system in health services research. J Rural Health. 2016; 32: 219-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12148
Mao L, Stacciarini JR, Smith R, et al.: An individual-based rurality measure and its health application: A case study of Latino immigrants in North Florida, USA. Soc Sci Med. 2015; 147: 300-308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.064
Ashley C, Maxwell S: Rethinking rural development. Dev Policy Rev. 2001; 19(4): 395-425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7679.00141
Nelson KS, Nguyen TD: Community assets and relative rurality index: A multi-dimensional measure of rurality. J Rural Stud. 2023; 97: 322-333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.12.025
Miller Hesed CD, Van Dolah ER, Paolisso M: Engaging faith-based communities for rural coastal resilience: Lessons from collaborative learning on the Chesapeake Bay. Clim Change. 2020; 159: 37-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02638-9
Van Scoy LJ, Duda SH, Scott AM, et al.: A mixed methods study exploring requests for unproven COVID therapies such as Ivermectin and healthcare distrust in the rural south. Prevent Med Rep. 2023; 31: 102104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.102104
McSpirit S, Scott S, Gill D, et al.: Risk perceptions after a coal waste impoundment failure: A survey assessment. J Rural Soc Sci. 2007; 22(2): 6.
Ashwood L: For-Profit Democracy: Why the Government Is Losing the Trust of Rural America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300215359.001.0001
Janssen D: Disaster planning in rural America. Public Manager. 2006; 35(3): 40-43.
Horney JA, Nguyen M, Cooper J, et al.: Accounting for vulnerable populations in rural hazard mitigation plans: Results of a survey of emergency managers. J Emerg Manag. 2013; 11(3): 201-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.2013.0138
Horney JA, Naimi AI, Lyles W, et al.: Assessing the relationship between hazard mitigation plan quality and rural status in a cohort of 57 counties from 3 states in the Southern US. Challenges. 2012; 3: 183-193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/challe3020183
Horney JA, Nguyen MT, Salvesen D, et al.: Assessing the quality of rural hazard mitigation plans in the southeastern United States. J Plann Educ Res. 2017; 37(1): 56-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X16628605
Burns T, Stalker GM: The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock, 1961.
Creswell JW: Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009.
QuickFacts: US census bureau. Available at https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045221. Accessed August 1, 2022.
Am I rural? Rural health information hub. Available at https://www.ruralhealthinfo.org/am-i-rural. Accessed August 1, 2022.
West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resource: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) dashboard: West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources. 2019. Available at https://dhhr.wv.gov/COVID-19/pages/default.aspx. Accessed August 1, 2022.
Lagadec P: State of Emergency: Technological Failures and Social Destabilization. London: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1990.
Feldman MS, Khademian AM, Ingram H, et al.: Ways of knowing and inclusive management processes. Public Adm Rev. 2006; 66: 89-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00669.x
Morgeson FP: The external leadership of self-managing teams: Intervening in the context of novel and disruptive events. J Appl Psychol. 2005; 90(3): 497-508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.497
Ducharme J: West Virginia just became the last state to report a COVID-19 case. It was only a matter of time. Time. March 17, 2020. Available at https://time.com/5805097/west-Virginia-covid-19-testing. Accessed August 1, 2022.
Boin RA, ‘T Hart P, Stern E, et al.: The Politics of Crisis Management: Public Leadership under Pressure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316339756
Crosby BC, Bryson JM: Integrative leadership and the creation and maintenance of cross-sector collaborations. Leadersh Q. 2010; 21(2): 211-230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.01.003
Pearce CL, Sims HP Jr: Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dyn Theory Res Practice. 2002; 6(2): 172-197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//1089-2699.6.2.172
Murphy J, Rhodes ML, Meek JW, et al.: Managing the entanglement: Complexity leadership in public sector systems. Public Adm Rev. 2017; 77(5): 692-704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12698
Wasserman S, Faust K: Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815478
US Dept of Homeland Security: Developing and Maintaining Emergency Operations Plans: Comprehensive Preparedness Guide (CPG) 101. Version 3.0. Washington, DC: US Dept of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2021.
Combe IA, Carrington DJ: Leaders’ sense-making under crises: Emerging cognitive consensus over time within management teams. Leadersh Q. 2015; 26(3): 307-322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.02.002
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright 2007-2023, Weston Medical Publishing, LLC and Journal of Emergency Management. All Rights Reserved
