Logic of crisis management practice in handling the COVID-19 pandemic: Experiences from two Swedish public-sector organizations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.0874Keywords:
coronavirus disease 2019, public-sector organization, practice, higher management, operational managementAbstract
This study aims to examine the ambiguity and uncertainty surrounding crisis management and the implementation of national recommendations in two public-sector organizations during the initial phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This study is based on two case studies: a municipality and a county administrative board in Sweden. Data were collected through interviews, surveys, and participation in meetings, and they were analyzed using a practice theory lens. The results demonstrate a lack of knowledge and uncertainty regarding the crisis management structure, leading to conflicting interpretations of rules, recommendations, and decision-making procedures. The somewhat uncoordinated response from central authorities had a significant impact on local handling of the crisis, requiring higher management to spend considerable time interpreting the regulations and adjusting them to the local situation. The lack of clear decision procedures and support from higher management creates frustration and anxiety among operational managers. Organizations struggle to keep up with fast-changing guidelines and implement them effectively, resulting in an increased workload and challenges in prioritizing resources. The study also reveals concerns about the long-term consequences and ability to maintain quality in core activities during a wide-ranging crisis as the COVID-19 pandemic.
References
Socialdepartementet: Äldreomsorgen under Pandemin: Delbetänkande av Coronakommissionen (SOU 2020:80) [Sweden during the Pandemic. Elderly Care] (SOU 2020:80). Stockholm: Government of Sweden, 2020.
Socialdepartementet: Volym 1, Sjukvård Och Folkhälsa; Volym 2, Smittspridning Och Smittskydd [Sweden during the Pandemic. Volume 1, Healthcare; Public Health, and Volume 2 Infection and Infection Control]. SOU 2021. Stockholm: Government of Sweden, 2021.
Ansell C, Boin A, Keller A: Managing transboundary crises: Identifying the building blocks of an effective response system. Contingen Crisis Manag. 2010; 18(4): 195-207. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5973.2010.00620.x.
Peters BG, Pierre J, Randma-Liiv T: Global financial crisis, public administration and governance: Do new problems require new solutions? Public Organ Rev. 2011; 11: 13-27.
Stark A: The tradition of ministerial responsibility and its role in the bureaucratic management of crises. Public Adm. 2011; 89(3): 1148-1163.
’t Hart P, Rosenthal U, Kouzmin A: Crisis decision making: The centralization thesis revisited. Adm Soc. 1993; 25(1): 12-45.
Boin A, ’t Hart P, Stern E, et al.: The Politics of Crisis Management: Public Leadership under Pressure (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).
Weick KE, Sutcliffe K: Managing the Unexpected: Assuring High Performance in an Age of Complexity. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass, 2001.
Doyle EE, McClure J, Paton D, et al.: Uncertainty and decision making: Volcanic crisis scenarios. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2014; 10: 75-101.
Lipshitz R, Strauss O: Coping with uncertainty: A naturalistic decision-making analysis. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1997; 69(2): 149-163.
Eckhard S, Lenz A, Seibel W, et al.: Latent hybridity in administrative crisis management: The German refugee crisis of 2015/16. J Public Adm Res Theory. 2021; 31(2): 416-433.
Oscarsson O, Danielsson E: Unrecognized crisis management-normalizing everyday work: The work practice of crisis management in a refugee situation. Contingen Crisis Manag. 2018; 26(2): 225-236.
Sparf J: Trust and organization: Integrating responses to freshwater contamination within the everyday work of a care organization. In Holla K (ed.): Crisis Management Theory and Practice. London: IntechOpen, 2018: 75-93, Chapter 5.
Rietjens SJ, Verlaan K, Zaalberg TWB, et al.: Inter-organisational communication in civil-military cooperation during complex emergencies: A case study in Afghanistan 1. Disasters. 2009; 33(3): 412-435.
Danielsson E: Following routines: A challenge in cross-sectorial collaboration. Contingen Crisis Manag. 2016; 24(1): 36-45. DOI: 10.1111/1468-5973.12093.
Nohrstedt D, Bynander F, Parker C, et al.: Managing crises collaboratively: Prospects and problems—A systematic literature review. Perspect Public Manag Gov. 2018; 1(4): 257-271.
Rosenthal U, Kouzmin A: Crises and crisis management: Toward comprehensive government decision making. J Public Adm Res Theory. 1997; 7(2): 277-304.
Hupe P: What happens on the ground: Persistent issues in implementation research. Public Policy Adm. 2014; 29(2): 164-182.
Brodkin EZ: Street-level organizations at the front lines of crises. J Comp Policy Anal Res Practice. 2021; 23(1): 16-29.
SFS 1974. 152: Regeringsformen Justitiedepartementet.
SFS 2017. 900: Förvaltningslagen Justitiedepartementet.
Deverell E, Alvinius A, Hede S: Horizontal collaboration in crisis management: An experimental study of the duty officer function in three public agencies. Risk Hazard Crisis Public Policy. 2019; 10(4): 484-508.
Danielsson E: Crisis management made visible: A case study of a school fire. J Emerg Manag. 2021; 19(5): 479-492.
Oscarsson O: Crisis as Practice: Non-Emergency Organizations’ Coping with Crises. Östersund: Mid Sweden University, 2021.
Petridou E: Politics and administration in times of crisis: Explaining the Swedish response to the COVID-19 crisis. Eur Policy Anal. 2020; 6(2): 147-158.
Mayntz R: From government to governance: Political steering in modern societies. In Scheer D, Rubik F (eds.): Governance of Integrated Product Policy Routledge. Milton Park: Routledge, 2017: 18-25.
Rhodes RAW: Understanding Governance. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 1997.
Olausson PM, Nyhlén J: Organization and decision-making in enforced networks: The river groups in Northern Sweden. Contingen Crisis Manag. 2017; 25(4): 313-325.
Kendra JM, Wachtendorf T: Elements of resilience after the world trade center disaster: Reconstituting New York city’s emergency operations centre. Disasters. 2003; 27(1): 37-53. DOI: 10.1111/1467-7717.00218.
Danielsson E, Susanna Ö: Krishantering: Central samordning och lokal samverkan. [Crisis management: Central coordination and local cooperation]. In Eliasson J, Unemo L (eds.): I en Tid av Pandemi— En ESO—Antologi Med Samhällsvetenskapliga Reflektioner [In a Time of Pandemic—An ESO Anthology—Social Science Reflections]. Stockholm: The Expert Group for Studies in Public Economics (ESO), 2021.
Weick KE: The Social Psychology of Organizing. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979.
Whittington R: Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Organ Stud. 2006; 27(5): 613-634.
Hällgren M: Avvikelsens Mekanismer: Observationer av Projekt i Praktiken [Mechanisms of Deviations: Observations of Projects in Practice] [dissertation]. Umeå: Umeå School of Business, Economics and Statistics, 2009.
Jarzabkowski P, Balogun J, Seidl D: Strategizing: The challenges of a practice perspective. Hum Relat. 2007; 60(1): 5-27.
Blomquist T, Hällgren M, Nilsson A, et al.: Project-as-practice: In search of project management research that matters. Project Manag J. 2010; 41(1): 5-16.
Hällgren M, Söderholm A: Projects-as-practice: New approach, new insights. In Morris P, Pinto J, Söderlund J (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Project Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011: 500-518.
Yin RK: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 2nd ed. Newcastle upon Tyne: Sage, 1994.
Asp V, Bynander F, Daléus P, et al.: Bara skog som brinner? – Utvärdering av krishanteringen under skogsbranden I Västmanland 2014 FHS/Crismart, 2015.
Kvarnlöf L, Danielsson E, Ekholm S, et al.: Frivilligheten och skogsbränderna sommaren 2018 [Volunteering and the forest fires in the summer of 2018]. Risk and Crisis Research Centre, Mid Sweden University. RCR Working Paper Series, 2022: 1.
Greenwood R, Díaz AM, Li SX, et al.: The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organ Sci. 2010; 21(2): 521-539.
Öberg C: Conflicting logics for crisis management in tourism. J Tour. Futures. 2021; 7(3): 311-321.
Kapucu N, Arslan T, Demiroz F: Collaborative emergency management and national emergency management network. Disaster Prev Manag. 2010; 19(4): 452-468.
Sparf J: Tillit i Samhällsskyddets Organisation: Om Det Sociala Gränssnittet Mellan Kommunen Och Funktionshindrade i Risk-Och Krishantering [Trust in Civil Protection and Preparedness. On the Social Interface in Risk and Crisis Management between Disabled People and the Municipal Organization] [dissertation]. Östersund: Mid Sweden University, 2014.
Davidovitz M, Cohen N, Gofen A: Governmental response to crises and its implications for street-level implementation: Policy ambiguity, risk, and discretion during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Comp Policy Anal Res Practice. 2021; 23(1): 120-130.
Allain-Dupré D, Chatry I, Michalun V, et al.: The territorial impact of COVID-19: Managing the crisis across levels of government. OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19). 2020, 1620846020-1909698535.15994313.
Angelici M, Berta P, Costa-Font J, et al.: Divided we survive? Multilevel governance during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy and Spain. Publius. 2023; 53(2): 227-250.

Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright 2007-2025, Weston Medical Publishing, LLC and Journal of Emergency Management. All Rights Reserved.