Disability-inclusive data collection and survey outcomes that reflect the lived experiences of people with disabilities in emergencies or disasters

Dawn Skaggs; Katherine Sanches

doi:10.5055/jem.0889

Authors

Dawn Skaggs, MA https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2792-8580
Katherine Sanches, DrPH

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.0889

Keywords:

disability inclusion in disaster research and implementation, equity in disasters for people with disabilities, disability-inclusive disaster risk reduction

Abstract

This article documents a disability-inclusive study conducted in partnership with disability-led community-based organizations in survey development and distribution. Information collection focused on the lived experiences of people with disabilities, their perceived impact, and their future expectations. Survey results from 413 individuals with disabilities document the disaster or personal crisis-related experiences and their subsequent impacts. Results from a selection of survey questions were identified for further exploration and their potential impact on disability-inclusive planning, response, and recovery, with a view to identifying potential variables that impact the disproportionate impact of disasters on people with disabilities. Perspectives provided by survey respondents, who were exclusively people with disabilities, overlapped with but did not necessarily align with what is known about emergency and disaster response systems. Study outcomes supported current recommended practices for inclusive planning with people with disabilities. The study supports the premise that accessibility, programmatic inclusion, and effective communication impact the lived experience of people with disabilities in disasters and warrant additional inquiry. Furthermore, the equitable and valued involvement of people with disabilities and disability-led organizations is essential in disaster research, policy, and practice that does not leave anyone behind. Research can, and should, be conducted in coordination with disability stakeholders and people with disabilities in order to generate useful and implementable policy and practice information. This inclusive approach should take priority over rigorous academic research methods and standards for principled and practical considerations.

Author Biographies

Dawn Skaggs, MA

Chief Program Officer, World Institute on Disability (WID), Berkeley, California

Katherine Sanches, DrPH

World Institute on Disability (WID), Berkeley, California

References

FEMA: A whole community approach to emergency management: Principles, themes, and pathways for action. 2011. Available at https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/2020-07/whole_community_dec2011__2.pdf. Accessed November 2023.

Yeo R, Moore K: Including disabled people in poverty reduction work: “nothing about us, without us.” World Dev. 2003; 31(3): 571-590. DOI: 10.1016/s0305-750x(02)00218-8.

Institute on Disability/UCD: 2018 annual report on people with disabilities in America. 2019. Available at https://disabilitycompendium.org/sites/default/files/user- uploads/Annual_Report_2018_Accessible_AdobeReaderFriendly.pdf. Accessed September 2023.

Karr VL, Van Edema A, McCloskey M, et al.: The inclusion of persons with disabilities in US foreign policy. J Disabil Policy Stud. 2022; 32(4): 235-244. DOI: 10.1177/1044207320959765.

Nosek BA, Smyth FL, Hansen JJ, et al.: Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. Eur Rev Soc Psychol. 2007; 18(1): 36-88. DOI: 10.1080/10463280701489053.

Charlesworth TES, Banaji MR: Patterns of implicit and explicit attitudes: IV. Change and stability from 2007 to 2020. Psychol Sci. 2022; 33(9): 1347-1371. DOI: 10.1177/09567976221084257.

USAID: Cover page for “Nothing without us: USAID disability policy.” Available at https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/2023-11/Unified-Disability-Policy-DRAFT-7.pdf. Accessed February 16, 2024.

Bureau UC: Week 52 household pulse survey. Available at https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2023/demo/hhp/hhp52.html. Accessed September 2023.

Gusner P: Natural disaster facts and statistics 2023—Forbes. 2023. Available at https://www.forbes.com/advisor/homeownersinsurance/natural-disaster-statistics/. Accessed July 2023.

E&E News: Majority of disabled people never go home after disasters. Available at https://subscriber.politicopro.com/article/eenews/2023/01/06/most-disabled-people-never-go-home-after-disasters-00076666. Accessed February 16, 2024.

Stough LM, Kelman I: People with disabilities and disasters. In Handbook of Disaster Research. Berlin: Springer, 2017: 225-242. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-63254-4_1.

National Council on Disability: Preserving our freedom: Ending institutionalization of people with disabilities during and after disasters. Available at https://www.ncd.gov/report/preserving-ourfreedom-ending-institutionalization-of-people-with-disabilitiesduring-and-after-disasters/. Accessed February 16, 2024.

Izutsu T: Disability-inclusive disaster risk reduction and humanitarian action: An urgent global imperative. In United Nations World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction and the Progress. 2019. Available at https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/wp-content/uploads/sites/15/2020/03/Final-Disabilityinclusive-disaster.pdf. Accessed November 2023.

Goodman N, Morris M, Boston K, et al.: Financial inequality: Disability, race and poverty in America. Available at https://nationaldisabilityinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/disability-race-poverty-in-america.pdf. Accessed February 16, 2024.

SAMHSA: Key substance use on mental health indicators in the United States: Results from the 2021 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. 2022. Available at https://www.samhsa.gov/data/report/2021-nsduh-annual-national-report. Accessed June 2023.